Literature DB >> 25841965

Effect of sensor systems for cow management on milk production, somatic cell count, and reproduction.

W Steeneveld1, J C M Vernooij2, H Hogeveen3.   

Abstract

To improve management on dairy herds, sensor systems have been developed that can measure physiological, behavioral, and production indicators on individual cows. It is not known whether using sensor systems also improves measures of health and production in dairy herds. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of using sensor systems on measures of health and production in dairy herds. Data of 414 Dutch dairy farms with (n=152) and without (n=262) sensor systems were available. For these herds, information on milk production per cow, days to first service, first calving age, and somatic cell count (SCC) was provided for the years 2003 to 2013. Moreover, year of investment in sensor systems was available. For every farm year, we determined whether that year was before or after the year of investment in sensor systems on farms with an automatic milking system (AMS) or a conventional milking system (CMS), or whether it was a year on a farm that never invested in sensor systems. Separate statistical analyses were performed to determine the effect of sensor systems for mastitis detection (color, SCC, electrical conductivity, and lactate dehydrogenase sensors), estrus detection for dairy cows, estrus detection for young stock, and other sensor systems (weighing platform, rumination time sensor, fat and protein sensor, temperature sensor, milk temperature sensor, urea sensor, β-hydroxybutyrate sensor, and other sensor systems). The AMS farms had a higher average SCC (by 12,000 cells/mL) after sensor investment, and CMS farms with a mastitis detection system had a lower average SCC (by 10,000 cells/mL) in the years after sensor investment. Having sensor systems was associated with a higher average production per cow on AMS farms, and with a lower average production per cow on CMS farms in the years after investment. The most likely reason for this lower milk production after investment was that on 96% of CMS farms, the sensor system investment occurred together with another major change at the farm, such as a new barn or a new milking system. Most likely, these other changes had led to a decrease in milk production that could not be compensated for by the use of sensor systems. Having estrus detection sensor systems did not improve reproduction performance. Labor reduction was an important reason for investing in sensor systems. Therefore, economic benefits from investments in sensor systems can be expected more from the reduction in labor costs than from improvements in measures of health and production in dairy herds.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy; milk production; sensor; somatic cell count

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841965     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bovine mastitis prevention and control in the post-antibiotic era.

Authors:  Amr El-Sayed; Mohamed Kamel
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  A Systematic Review on Validated Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Pig Production and Its Potential to Assess Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Yaneth Gómez; Anna H Stygar; Iris J M M Boumans; Eddie A M Bokkers; Lene J Pedersen; Jarkko K Niemi; Matti Pastell; Xavier Manteca; Pol Llonch
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-14

Review 3.  Biosensors for On-Farm Diagnosis of Mastitis.

Authors:  Sofia A M Martins; Verónica C Martins; Filipe A Cardoso; José Germano; Mónica Rodrigues; Carla Duarte; Ricardo Bexiga; Susana Cardoso; Paulo P Freitas
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-31

4.  A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Yaneth Gómez; Greta V Berteselli; Emanuela Dalla Costa; Elisabetta Canali; Jarkko K Niemi; Pol Llonch; Matti Pastell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-29

5.  Assessment of feeding, ruminating and locomotion behaviors in dairy cows around calving - a retrospective clinical study to early detect spontaneous disease appearance.

Authors:  Mahmoud Fadul; Luigi D'Andrea; Maher Alsaaod; Giuliano Borriello; Antonio Di Lori; Dimitri Stucki; Paolo Ciaramella; Adrian Steiner; Jacopo Guccione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adoption of Precision Technologies by Brazilian Dairy Farms: The Farmer's Perception.

Authors:  Rebeca Silvi; Luiz Gustavo R Pereira; Claudio Antônio V Paiva; Thierry R Tomich; Vanessa A Teixeira; João Paulo Sacramento; Rafael E P Ferreira; Sandra G Coelho; Fernanda S Machado; Mariana M Campos; João Ricardo R Dórea
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.