Literature DB >> 25841707

Sensitivity of neuroprogenitor cells to chemical-induced apoptosis using a multiplexed assay suitable for high-throughput screening.

Ingrid Druwe1, Theresa M Freudenrich2, Kathleen Wallace2, Timothy J Shafer2, William R Mundy3.   

Abstract

High-throughput methods are useful for rapidly screening large numbers of chemicals for biological activity, including the perturbation of pathways that may lead to adverse cellular effects. In vitro assays for the key events of neurodevelopment, including apoptosis, may be used in a battery of tests for detecting chemicals that could result in developmental neurotoxicity. Apoptosis contributes to nervous system development by regulating the size of the neuroprogenitor cell pool, and the balance between cellular proliferation and apoptosis during neuroprogenitor cell proliferation helps to determine the size and shape of the nervous system. Therefore, chemicals that affect apoptosis during neuronal development can have deleterious effects on the developing brain. The present study examined the utility of a high-throughput assay to detect chemical-induced apoptosis in mouse or human neuroprogenitor cells, as well as differentiated human neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Apoptosis was assessed using an assay that measures enzymatic activity of caspase-3/7 in a rapid and cost efficient manner. The results show that all three commercially available models generated a robust source of proliferating neuroprogenitor cells, and that the assay was sensitive and reproducible when used in a multi-well plate format. There were differences in the response of rodent and human neuroprogenitor cells to a set of chemicals previously shown to induce apoptosis in vitro. Neuroprogenitor cells were more sensitive to chemical-induced apoptosis than differentiated neurons, suggesting that neuroprogenitor cells are one of the cell models that should be considered for use in a developmental neurotoxicity screening battery. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Developmental neurotoxicity; High throughput screening; In vitro models; Neuroprogenitor cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841707     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  11 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities and challenges for using the zebrafish to study neuronal connectivity as an endpoint of developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Galen W Miller; Vidya Chandrasekaran; Bianca Yaghoobi; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  [Leukocyte count of puerperal sows].

Authors:  D Mäde; G Wujanz
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.328

3.  Diverse neurotoxicants target the differentiation of embryonic neural stem cells into neuronal and glial phenotypes.

Authors:  Theodore A Slotkin; Samantha Skavicus; Jennifer Card; Edward D Levin; Frederic J Seidler
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  High-content imaging of 3D-cultured neural stem cells on a 384-pillar plate for the assessment of cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Pranav Joshi; Soo-Yeon Kang; Kyeong-Nam Yu; Chandrasekhar Kothapalli; Moo-Yeal Lee
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  DNA Damage Response and Repair, DNA Methylation, and Cell Death in Human Neurons and Experimental Animal Neurons Are Different.

Authors:  Lee J Martin; Qing Chang
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 6.  iPSC modeling of rare pediatric disorders.

Authors:  Bethany A Freel; Jordan N Sheets; Kevin R Francis
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Integrating Data From In Vitro New Approach Methodologies for Developmental Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Kelly E Carstens; Amy F Carpenter; Melissa M Martin; Joshua A Harrill; Timothy J Shafer; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.109

8.  Potential frameworks to support evaluation of mechanistic data for developmental neurotoxicity outcomes: A symposium report.

Authors:  Laura M Carlson; Frances A Champagne; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Laura Dishaw; Elaine Faustman; William Mundy; Deborah Segal; Christina Sobin; Carol Starkey; Michele Taylor; Susan L Makris; Andrew Kraft
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 9.  Genotoxic Damage During Brain Development Presages Prototypical Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Glen E Kisby; Peter S Spencer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Optimization of Human Neural Progenitor Cells for an Imaging-Based High-Throughput Phenotypic Profiling Assay for Developmental Neurotoxicity Screening.

Authors:  Megan Culbreth; Johanna Nyffeler; Clinton Willis; Joshua A Harrill
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.