Jacqueline Palace1, Martin Duddy2, Thomas Bregenzer3, Michael Lawton4, Feng Zhu5, Mike Boggild6, Benjamin Piske3, Neil P Robertson7, Joel Oger5, Helen Tremlett5, Kate Tilling4, Yoav Ben-Shlomo4, Charles Dobson8. 1. Department of Clinical Neurology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK. 2. Department of Neurology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 3. Department of Biostatistics, PAREXEL International, Berlin, Germany. 4. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 5. Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 6. Department of Neurology, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville, QLD, Australia. 7. Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. 8. Department of Health, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2002, the UK's National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) concluded that interferon beta and glatiramer acetate would be cost effective as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis only if the short-term disability benefits reported in clinical trials were maintained. The UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme (RSS) was established to assess whether disability progression was consistent with a cost-effectiveness target of £36 000 per quality-adjusted life-year projected over 20 years. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these DMTs by comparing a cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis enrolled in the UK RSS with a natural history cohort from British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: In our clinical cohort we included patients starting a DMT who were enrolled in the UK RSS who had relapsing multiple sclerosis at baseline and had at least one further clinical assessment. In our control cohort we included patients in the British Columbia multiple sclerosis database (BCMS; data collection 1980-96) who met the same eligibility criteria as for the RSS cohort. We compared disability progression at 6 years for RSS patients with untreated progression modelled from BCMS patients using continuous Markov and multilevel models. The primary outcomes were the progression ratio (treated vs untreated) measured both in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and utility. A ratio of less than 100% for EDSS implied slower than expected progression on treatment compared with off treatment; a utility ratio of 62% or less implied that the DMTs were cost effective. FINDINGS: 5610 patients starting a DMT were enrolled in the UK RSS between Jan 14, 2002, and July 13, 2005 (72 sites), of whom 4137 were included in our clinical cohort. We included 898 BCMS patients in the control cohort who met the RSS inclusion criteria and had at least one EDSS score after baseline. RSS patients had a mean follow-up of 5·1 years (SD 1·4). Both models showed slower EDSS progression than predicted for untreated controls (Markov model, 75·8% [95% CI 71·4-80·2]; multilevel model, 60·0% [56·6-63·4]). Utility ratios were consistent with cost-effectiveness (Markov model, 58·5% [95% CI 54·2-62·8]; multilevel model, 57·1% [53·0-61·2]). INTERPRETATION: Findings from this large observational study of treatment with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate provide evidence that their effects on disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are maintained and cost effective over 6 years. Similar modelling approaches could be applied to other chronic diseases for which long-term controlled trials are not feasible. FUNDING: Health Departments of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Bayer Schering Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, UK National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment Programme.
BACKGROUND: In 2002, the UK's National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) concluded that interferon beta and glatiramer acetate would be cost effective as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis only if the short-term disability benefits reported in clinical trials were maintained. The UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme (RSS) was established to assess whether disability progression was consistent with a cost-effectiveness target of £36 000 per quality-adjusted life-year projected over 20 years. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these DMTs by comparing a cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis enrolled in the UK RSS with a natural history cohort from British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: In our clinical cohort we included patients starting a DMT who were enrolled in the UK RSS who had relapsing multiple sclerosis at baseline and had at least one further clinical assessment. In our control cohort we included patients in the British Columbia multiple sclerosis database (BCMS; data collection 1980-96) who met the same eligibility criteria as for the RSS cohort. We compared disability progression at 6 years for RSS patients with untreated progression modelled from BCMS patients using continuous Markov and multilevel models. The primary outcomes were the progression ratio (treated vs untreated) measured both in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and utility. A ratio of less than 100% for EDSS implied slower than expected progression on treatment compared with off treatment; a utility ratio of 62% or less implied that the DMTs were cost effective. FINDINGS: 5610 patients starting a DMT were enrolled in the UK RSS between Jan 14, 2002, and July 13, 2005 (72 sites), of whom 4137 were included in our clinical cohort. We included 898 BCMS patients in the control cohort who met the RSS inclusion criteria and had at least one EDSS score after baseline. RSS patients had a mean follow-up of 5·1 years (SD 1·4). Both models showed slower EDSS progression than predicted for untreated controls (Markov model, 75·8% [95% CI 71·4-80·2]; multilevel model, 60·0% [56·6-63·4]). Utility ratios were consistent with cost-effectiveness (Markov model, 58·5% [95% CI 54·2-62·8]; multilevel model, 57·1% [53·0-61·2]). INTERPRETATION: Findings from this large observational study of treatment with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate provide evidence that their effects on disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are maintained and cost effective over 6 years. Similar modelling approaches could be applied to other chronic diseases for which long-term controlled trials are not feasible. FUNDING: Health Departments of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Bayer Schering Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, UK National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Authors: Maria Trojano; Mar Tintore; Xavier Montalban; Jan Hillert; Tomas Kalincik; Pietro Iaffaldano; Tim Spelman; Maria Pia Sormani; Helmut Butzkueven Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: David Bargiela; Matthew T Bianchi; M Brandon Westover; Lori B Chibnik; Brian C Healy; Philip L De Jager; Zongqi Xia Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lindsey B De Lott; James F Burke; Kevin A Kerber; Lesli E Skolarus; Brian C Callaghan Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tomas Kalincik; Ibrahima Diouf; Sifat Sharmin; Charles Malpas; Tim Spelman; Dana Horakova; Eva Kubala Havrdova; Maria Trojano; Guillermo Izquierdo; Alessandra Lugaresi; Alexandre Prat; Marc Girard; Pierre Duquette; Pierre Grammond; Vilija Jokubaitis; Anneke van der Walt; Francois Grand'Maison; Patrizia Sola; Diana Ferraro; Vahid Shaygannejad; Raed Alroughani; Raymond Hupperts; Murat Terzi; Cavit Boz; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Eugenio Pucci; Vincent Van Pesch; Franco Granella; Roberto Bergamaschi; Daniele Spitaleri; Mark Slee; Steve Vucic; Radek Ampapa; Pamela McCombe; Cristina Ramo-Tello; Julie Prevost; Javier Olascoaga; Edgardo Cristiano; Michael Barnett; Maria Laura Saladino; Jose Luis Sanchez-Menoyo; Suzanne Hodgkinson; Csilla Rozsa; Stella Hughes; Fraser Moore; Cameron Shaw; Ernest Butler; Olga Skibina; Orla Gray; Allan Kermode; Tunde Csepany; Bhim Singhal; Neil Shuey; Imre Piroska; Bruce Taylor; Magdolna Simo; Carmen-Adella Sirbu; Attila Sas; Helmut Butzkueven Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Bettina Trinschek; Felix Luessi; Catharina C Gross; Heinz Wiendl; Helmut Jonuleit Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 5.923