Literature DB >> 25841624

Long-term Results of the UCSF-LBNL Randomized Trial: Charged Particle With Helium Ion Versus Iodine-125 Plaque Therapy for Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma.

Kavita K Mishra1, Jeanne M Quivey2, Inder K Daftari2, Vivian Weinberg3, Tia B Cole4, Kishan Patel3, Joseph R Castro2, Theodore L Phillips2, Devron H Char5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Relevant clinical data are needed given the increasing national interest in charged particle radiation therapy (CPT) programs. Here we report long-term outcomes from the only randomized, stratified trial comparing CPT with iodine-125 plaque therapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1985 to 1991, 184 patients met eligibility criteria and were randomized to receive particle (86 patients) or plaque therapy (98 patients). Patients were stratified by tumor diameter, thickness, distance to disc/fovea, anterior extension, and visual acuity. Tumors close to the optic disc were included. Local tumor control, as well as eye preservation, metastases due to melanoma, and survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: Median follow-up times for particle and plaque arm patients were 14.6 years and 12.3 years, respectively (P=.22), and for those alive at last follow-up, 18.5 and 16.5 years, respectively (P=.81). Local control (LC) for particle versus plaque treatment was 100% versus 84% at 5 years, and 98% versus 79% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.0006). If patients with tumors close to the disc (<2 mm) were excluded, CPT still resulted in significantly improved LC: 100% versus 90% at 5 years and 98% versus 86% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.048). Enucleation rate was lower after CPT: 11% versus 22% at 5 years and 17% versus 37% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.01). Using Cox regression model, likelihood ratio test, treatment was the most important predictor of LC (P=.0002) and eye preservation (P=.01). CPT was a significant predictor of prolonged disease-free survival (log rank: P=.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Particle therapy resulted in significantly improved local control, eye preservation, and disease-free survival as confirmed by long-term outcomes from the only randomized study available to date comparing radiation modalities in choroidal and ciliary body melanoma.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841624     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  Juxtapapillary and circumpapillary choroidal melanoma: globe-sparing treatment outcomes with iodine-125 notched plaque brachytherapy.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Tara A McCannel; Colin A McCannel; James Lamb; Pin-Chieh Wang; Darlene Veruttipong; Robert Almanzor; D Jeffrey Demanes; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Jonathan E Lu; R Joel Welch; Kavita K Mishra; Inder K Daftari; Susanna S Park
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  New Clinical and Research Programs in Particle Beam Radiation Therapy: The University of California San Francisco Perspective.

Authors:  Mack Roach; Reinhard Schulte; Kavita Mishra; Bruce Faddegon; Igor Barani; Ann Lazar; Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Clinical trials involving carbon-ion radiation therapy and the path forward.

Authors:  Ann A Lazar; Reinhard Schulte; Bruce Faddegon; Eleanor A Blakely; Mack Roach
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jürgen Debus; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 7.  Uveal melanoma: epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of primary disease.

Authors:  Benjamin A Krantz; Nikita Dave; Kimberly M Komatsubara; Brian P Marr; Richard D Carvajal
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 8.  Treatment of uveal melanoma: where are we now?

Authors:  Jessica Yang; Daniel K Manson; Brian P Marr; Richard D Carvajal
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Clinical Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy for Choroidal Melanoma at a Single Institute in Korea.

Authors:  Tae Wan Kim; Euncheol Choi; Jeonghoon Park; Dong-Ho Shin; Su Kyung Jung; Susie Seok; Kwan Ho Cho; Joo-Young Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Tae Hyun Kim; Yang Kwon Suh; Yeon Joo Kim; Sung Ho Moon
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Linear accelerator-based stereotactic fractionated photon radiotherapy as an eye-conserving treatment for uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Sati Akbaba; Robert Foerster; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Nathalie Arians; Tilman Bostel; Juergen Debus; Henrik Hauswald
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.