Literature DB >> 25841609

Which patients are less likely to improve during the first year after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy? A multivariate analysis of 201 patients with prospective follow-up.

Barak Haviv1,2, Shlomo Bronak3, Yona Kosashvili4,5, Rafael Thein3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine which specific factors influence the improvements in function and pain at the first year following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
METHODS: Between 2012 and 2013, patients who had arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were included (n = 201) and followed prospectively before surgery and at 12 months. Multivariable stepwise analysis included preoperative variables (age, gender, limb side, height, weight, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking, Tegner activity scale, Lysholm knee score, preceding injury and duration of preoperative symptoms) and arthroscopic findings (degree of cartilage lesions, medial or lateral meniscus involvement, type of meniscal tear and concomitant cruciate tear). The Lysholm clinical score at the last follow-up and the time interval for substantial pain relief was modelled as a function of the above predictor variables.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean Lysholm score improved by 14.6 points (95 % CI 10.4-18.8, P < 0.001), from 68.0 ± 16.1 to 82.6 ± 19.6 points and 153 (76 %) patients declared they were satisfied to have had the operation. The mean time interval for substantial pain relief was 3.5 ± 1.5 months. Females and patients with lower preoperative Lysholm score were correlated with lower post-operative Lysholm score, while females and patients with lateral meniscal tears (compared to medial meniscal tears) were correlated with longer recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy improved pain and function at the first year post-operatively. Female gender, lateral meniscal tear and less favourable preoperative function were relatively correlated to worse post-operative function and longer rehabilitation time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Factors; Knee; Meniscectomy; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841609     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3590-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  19 in total

1.  Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P Faunø; A B Nielsen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Is arthroscopic surgery beneficial in treating non-traumatic, degenerative medial meniscal tears? A five year follow-up.

Authors:  Sylvia V Herrlin; Peter O Wange; Gunilla Lapidus; Maria Hållander; Suzanne Werner; Lars Weidenhielm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Long-term outcome of meniscectomy: symptoms, function, and performance tests in patients with or without radiographic osteoarthritis compared to matched controls.

Authors:  E M Roos; A Ostenberg; H Roos; C Ekdahl; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 5.  Factors predicting functional and radiographic outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dennis S Meredith; Elena Losina; Nizar N Mahomed; John Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Fifteen-year follow-up of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  R T Burks; M H Metcalf; R W Metcalf
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Predictors of short-term recovery differ from those of long-term outcome after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Patricia H Rosenberger; Peter Jokl; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear.

Authors:  Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Nurmi; Juha Kalske; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy in patients over 40 years old: a 5- to 11-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Y Matsusue; N L Thomson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls.

Authors:  M Englund; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Duration of symptoms prior to partial meniscectomy is not associated with the expression of osteoarthritis genes in the injured meniscus.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Eric J Schmidt; Lei Cai; Muhammad Farooq Rai
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Complex function of the knee joint: the current understanding of the knee.

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Werner Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Translation, validation, and cross-cultural adaption of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) into German.

Authors:  M Sgroi; M Däxle; S Kocak; H Reichel; T Kappe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Meniscal tear morphology independently affects pain relief following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in middle-aged patients.

Authors:  Masayuki Kamimura; Jutaro Umehara; Atsushi Takahashi; Yu Mori; Daisuke Chiba; Yoshiyuki Kuwahara; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Patient Outcomes After Observation Versus Debridement of Unstable Chondral Lesions During Partial Meniscectomy: The Chondral Lesions And Meniscus Procedures (ChAMP) Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Leslie J Bisson; Melissa A Kluczynski; William M Wind; Marc S Fineberg; Geoffrey A Bernas; Michael A Rauh; John M Marzo; Zehua Zhou; Jiwei Zhao
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Smoking Negatively Effects Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas R Kraus; Natalie A Lowenstein; Kirsten D Garvey; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  The predictive factors that are associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Song; Dongyang Chen; Xinsheng Qi; Qing Jiang; Caiwei Xia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Which factors are associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair?

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Song; Dongyang Chen; Xinsheng Qi; Qing Jiang; Caiwei Xia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Predictive Factors Associated With Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Time to Return to Activity After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Nonathletes.

Authors:  Lipeng Wang; Qingxi Lin; Xinsheng Qi; Dongyang Chen; Caiwei Xia; Xiaoxiao Song
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 10.  Risk Factors for Rapid Chondrolysis After Partial Lateral Meniscectomy: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Charles Pioger; Adnan Saithna; Vikram Kandhari; Mathieu Thaunat; Thais D Vieira; Benjamin Freychet; Florent Franck; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.