Literature DB >> 25841579

When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review.

Neal Shahidi1, George Ou1, Jennifer Telford1, Robert Enns1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ERCP is an advanced endoscopic procedure that is technically more challenging and carries a higher risk of adverse events compared with standard endoscopy. A discrepancy currently exists among guidelines regarding the number of ERCPs that a trainee needs to complete before procedural competency should be assessed. Our aim was to assess the learning curve for performing ERCP.
METHODS: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE (1946 to November 25, 2014) along with the gray literature to identify relevant citations. To warrant inclusion, citations were required to report successful trainee cannulation rate. Successful cannulation rate, set at a value of 80% or higher, was used as our baseline reference for competency.
RESULTS: Nine studies, assessing 137 trainees and 17,100 ERCPs, were included in our analysis. Overall, competency was achieved among the included studies between 70 to 400 ERCPs. In the 2 studies that used pancreatic duct cannulation rate, competency was achieved by 70 to 160 ERCPs. Of the 5 studies that used selective duct cannulation rate, competency was achieved by 79 to 300 ERCPs. Finally, in the 4 studies that used common bile duct cannulation rate, 2 studies reached the reference competency threshold by 160 to 400 ERCPs. On further stratification, when assessing native papilla deep common bile duct cannulation, only 1 study reached the reference competency threshold by 350 to 400 ERCPs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that as ERCP has evolved from a predominantly diagnostic to therapeutic procedure, procedural thresholds have risen well above North American training guidelines. Therefore, advanced endoscopy training programs need to reassess their current structure to ensure that procedural competency is being reached.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841579     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  26 in total

1.  Low ERCP Volume Is Associated with More Industry Representative Interactions but Similar Training of Nurses.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Phyllis Malpas; Sheryl E Lynch; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Measuring trainee competence in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Theodor Voiosu; Paul Bălănescu; Andrei Voiosu; Andreea Benguş; Carmen Preda; Devica S Umans; Radu Bogdan Mateescu; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Volume, specialty background, practice pattern, and outcomes in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an analysis of the national inpatient sample.

Authors:  Jac Cooper; Sapan Desai; Steve Scaife; Chad Gonczy; John Mellinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Competency assessment for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using an endoscopic part-task training box.

Authors:  Naoto Tamai; Hiroyuki Aihara; Masayuki Kato; Kimio Isshi; Kazuki Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Quality in endoscopy training-the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography case.

Authors:  Ivan Jovanovic; Klaus Mönkemüller
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 6.  How to measure quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  Alexander Krumov Katzarov; Zdravko Ivanov Dunkov; Ivan Popadiin; Krum Sotirov Katzarov
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

7.  Surgeon-performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Outcomes of 2392 procedures at two tertiary care centers.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Eleanor C Fung; Edward L Jones; Nichole E Zayan; Timothy D Wetzel; Sara E Martin Del Campo; Anahita D Jalilvand; Andrew J Suzo; Rebecca R Dettorre; James K Fullerton; Michael P Meara; John D Mellinger; Vimal K Narula; Jeffrey W Hazey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Samuel Han; Violette Simon; Matthew Hall; Dayna Early; Eva Aagaard; Wasif M Abidi; Subhas Banerjee; Todd H Baron; Michael Bartel; Erik Bowman; Brian C Brauer; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Linda Carlin; Amitabh Chak; Hemant Chatrath; Abhishek Choudhary; Bradley Confer; Gregory A Coté; Koushik K Das; Christopher J DiMaio; Andrew M Dries; Steven A Edmundowicz; Abdul Hamid El Chafic; Ihab El Hajj; Swan Ellert; Jason Ferreira; Anthony Gamboa; Ian S Gan; Lisa Gangarosa; Bhargava Gannavarapu; Stuart R Gordon; Nalini M Guda; Hazem T Hammad; Cynthia Harris; Sujai Jalaj; Paul Jowell; Sana Kenshil; Jason Klapman; Michael L Kochman; Sri Komanduri; Gabriel Lang; Linda S Lee; David E Loren; Frank J Lukens; Daniel Mullady; Raman V Muthusamy; Andrew S Nett; Mojtaba S Olyaee; Kavous Pakseresht; Pranith Perera; Patrick Pfau; Cyrus Piraka; John M Poneros; Amit Rastogi; Anthony Razzak; Brian Riff; Shreyas Saligram; James M Scheiman; Isaiah Schuster; Raj J Shah; Rishi Sharma; Joshua P Spaete; Ajaypal Singh; Muhammad Sohail; Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah; Tyler Stevens; James H Tabibian; Demetrios Tzimas; Dushant S Uppal; Shiro Urayama; Domenico Vitterbo; Andrew Y Wang; Wahid Wassef; Patrick Yachimski; Sergio Zepeda-Gomez; Tobias Zuchelli; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees: The Rapid Assessment of Trainee Endoscopy Skills Study.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Rajesh Keswani; Matt Hall; Samuel Han; Meer Akbar Ali; Brian Brauer; Linda Carlin; Amitabh Chak; Dan Collins; Gregory A Cote; David L Diehl; Christopher J DiMaio; Andrew Dries; Ihab El-Hajj; Swan Ellert; Kimberley Fairley; Ashley Faulx; Larissa Fujii-Lau; Srinivas Gaddam; Seng-Ian Gan; Jonathan P Gaspar; Chitiki Gautamy; Stuart Gordon; Cynthia Harris; Sarah Hyder; Ross Jones; Stephen Kim; Srinadh Komanduri; Ryan Law; Linda Lee; Rawad Mounzer; Daniel Mullady; V Raman Muthusamy; Mojtaba Olyaee; Patrick Pfau; Shreyas Saligram; Cyrus Piraka; Amit Rastogi; Laura Rosenkranz; Fadi Rzouq; Aditi Saxena; Raj J Shah; Violette C Simon; Aaron Small; Jayaprakash Sreenarasimhaiah; Andrew Walker; Andrew Y Wang; Rabindra R Watson; Robert H Wilson; Patrick Yachimski; Dennis Yang; Steven Edmundowicz; Dayna S Early
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  A System to Assess the Competency for Interpretation of Esophageal Manometry Identifies Variation in Learning Curves.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Rajesh N Keswani; Jody D Ciolino; David P Grande; Zoe I Listernick; Dustin A Carlson; Donald O Castell; Kerry B Dunbar; Andrew J Gawron; C Prakash Gyawali; Philip O Katz; David Katzka; Brian E Lacy; Stuart J Spechler; Roger Tatum; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.