Literature DB >> 25841383

Explosive radiation or uninformative genes? Origin and early diversification of tachinid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae).

Isaac S Winkler1, Jeremy D Blaschke2, Daniel J Davis3, John O Stireman4, James E O'Hara5, Pierfilippo Cerretti6, John K Moulton2.   

Abstract

Molecular phylogenetic studies at all taxonomic levels often infer rapid radiation events based on short, poorly resolved internodes. While such rapid episodes of diversification are an important and widespread evolutionary phenomenon, much of this poor phylogenetic resolution may be attributed to the continuing widespread use of "traditional" markers (mitochondrial, ribosomal, and some nuclear protein-coding genes) that are often poorly suited to resolve difficult, higher-level phylogenetic problems. Here we reconstruct phylogenetic relationships among a representative set of taxa of the parasitoid fly family Tachinidae and related outgroups of the superfamily Oestroidea. The Tachinidae are one of the most species rich, yet evolutionarily recent families of Diptera, providing an ideal case study for examining the differential performance of loci in resolving phylogenetic relationships and the benefits of adding more loci to phylogenetic analyses. We assess the phylogenetic utility of nine genes including both traditional genes (e.g., CO1 mtDNA, 28S rDNA) and nuclear protein-coding genes newly developed for phylogenetic analysis. Our phylogenetic findings, based on a limited set of taxa, include: a close relationship between Tachinidae and the calliphorid subfamily Polleninae, monophyly of Tachinidae and the subfamilies Exoristinae and Dexiinae, subfamily groupings of Dexiinae+Phasiinae and Tachininae+Exoristinae, and robust phylogenetic placement of the somewhat enigmatic genera Strongygaster, Euthera, and Ceracia. In contrast to poor resolution and phylogenetic incongruence of "traditional genes," we find that a more selective set of highly informative genes is able to more precisely identify regions of the phylogeny that experienced rapid radiation of lineages, while more accurately depicting their phylogenetic context. Although much expanded taxon sampling is necessary to effectively assess the monophyly of and relationships among major tachinid lineages and their relatives, we show that a small number of well-chosen nuclear protein-coding genes can successfully resolve even difficult phylogenetic problems.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Molecular phylogenetics; Oestroidea; Phylogenetic informativeness; Pollenia; Rapid radiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841383     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  8 in total

1.  Mitogenome-wise codon usage pattern from comparative analysis of the first mitogenome of Blepharipa sp. (Muga uzifly) with other Oestroid flies.

Authors:  Debajyoti Kabiraj; Hasnahana Chetia; Adhiraj Nath; Pragya Sharma; Ponnala Vimal Mosahari; Deepika Singh; Palash Dutta; Kartik Neog; Utpal Bora
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Annotated catalogue of the Tachinidae (Insecta, Diptera) of the Afrotropical Region, with the description of seven new genera.

Authors:  James E O'Hara; Pierfilippo Cerretti
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  Molecular phylogeny of the megadiverse insect infraorder Bibionomorpha sensu lato (Diptera).

Authors:  Jan Ševčík; David Kaspřák; Michal Mantič; Scott Fitzgerald; Tereza Ševčíková; Andrea Tóthová; Mathias Jaschhof
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  DNA Barcodes for the Northern European Tachinid Flies (Diptera: Tachinidae).

Authors:  Jaakko L O Pohjoismäki; Jere Kahanpää; Marko Mutanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  First fossil of an oestroid fly (Diptera: Calyptratae: Oestroidea) and the dating of oestroid divergences.

Authors:  Pierfilippo Cerretti; John O Stireman; Thomas Pape; James E O'Hara; Marco A T Marinho; Knut Rognes; David A Grimaldi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Monophyletic blowflies revealed by phylogenomics.

Authors:  Liping Yan; Thomas Pape; Karen Meusemann; Sujatha Narayanan Kutty; Rudolf Meier; Keith M Bayless; Dong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Mitochondrial Genomes Among the Calliphoridae (Insecta: Diptera: Oestroidea) and Phylogenetic Implications.

Authors:  Yanjie Shang; Lipin Ren; Xiangyan Zhang; Yi Li; Changquan Zhang; Yadong Guo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genomic Mining of Phylogenetically Informative Nuclear Markers in Bark and Ambrosia Beetles.

Authors:  Dario Pistone; Sigrid Mugu; Bjarte Henry Jordal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.