Victoire Merz1, Juliette Baptista1, Dagmar M Haller2. 1. Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Primary Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brief interventions addressing harmful alcohol use in adults admitted to emergency wards have been shown to be effective. The evidence in relation to interventions aimed at adolescents is less conclusive. Young adults share developmental characteristics with adolescents, while receiving care in adult services. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the recurrence of alcohol-related events and their consequences in young adults (18-24 years) admitted to an emergency ward following alcohol intoxication. METHODS: We followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct this review. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane and PsychINFO, until March 2014. We included randomised trials of brief interventions aimed at young adults admitted to an emergency ward following an alcohol-related event. Two investigators independently selected, analysed, rated and summarised the evidence from relevant studies. RESULTS: Four trials (n=618) were included, comparing a brief motivational interview with usual care (2 trials), personalised feedback or an educational brochure. In two studies, motivational interview was significantly associated with a reduction in alcohol-use while two studies showed no effect attributable to the intervention. Successful interventions were either delivered at a distance from the event or included booster sessions. Motivational interview favoured a reduction in alcohol-related problems in all but one study. Benefits were sustained over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is inconclusive, but the most effective interventions include at least one therapeutic contact several days after the event. Further research should provide more guidance about effective interventions in this age-group as well as about ways to favour delayed attendance for treatment. The potential role of parents or peers in supporting treatment also warrants further attention. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Brief interventions addressing harmful alcohol use in adults admitted to emergency wards have been shown to be effective. The evidence in relation to interventions aimed at adolescents is less conclusive. Young adults share developmental characteristics with adolescents, while receiving care in adult services. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the recurrence of alcohol-related events and their consequences in young adults (18-24 years) admitted to an emergency ward following alcohol intoxication. METHODS: We followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct this review. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane and PsychINFO, until March 2014. We included randomised trials of brief interventions aimed at young adults admitted to an emergency ward following an alcohol-related event. Two investigators independently selected, analysed, rated and summarised the evidence from relevant studies. RESULTS: Four trials (n=618) were included, comparing a brief motivational interview with usual care (2 trials), personalised feedback or an educational brochure. In two studies, motivational interview was significantly associated with a reduction in alcohol-use while two studies showed no effect attributable to the intervention. Successful interventions were either delivered at a distance from the event or included booster sessions. Motivational interview favoured a reduction in alcohol-related problems in all but one study. Benefits were sustained over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is inconclusive, but the most effective interventions include at least one therapeutic contact several days after the event. Further research should provide more guidance about effective interventions in this age-group as well as about ways to favour delayed attendance for treatment. The potential role of parents or peers in supporting treatment also warrants further attention. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACCESS TO HLTH CARE; ADOLESCENTS CG; ALCOHOL; HEALTH BEHAVIOUR; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Authors: Shanthi Ameratunga; Bridget Kool; Sarah Sharpe; Papaarangi Reid; Arier Lee; Ian Civil; Gordon Smith; Vanessa Thornton; Matthew Walker; Robyn Whittaker Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Helen Frost; Pauline Campbell; Margaret Maxwell; Ronan E O'Carroll; Stephan U Dombrowski; Brian Williams; Helen Cheyne; Emma Coles; Alex Pollock Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.240