Mold allergens in respiratory allergy: from structure to therapy.

Allergic reactions to fungi were described 300 years ago, but the importance of allergy to fungi has been underestimated for a long time. Allergens from fungi mainly cause respiratory and skin symptoms in sensitized patients. In this review, we will focus on fungi and fungal allergens involved in respiratory forms of allergy, such as allergic rhinitis and asthma. Fungi can act as indoor and outdoor respiratory allergen sources, and depending on climate conditions, the rates of sensitization in individuals attending allergy clinics range from 5% to 20%. Due to the poor quality of natural fungal allergen extracts, diagnosis of fungal allergy is hampered, and allergen-specific immunotherapy is rarely given. Several factors are responsible for the poor quality of natural fungal extracts, among which the influence of culture conditions on allergen contents. However, molecular cloning techniques have allowed us to isolate DNAs coding for fungal allergens and to produce a continuously growing panel of recombinant allergens for the diagnosis of fungal allergy. Moreover, technologies are now available for the preparation of recombinant and synthetic fungal allergen derivatives which can be used to develop safe vaccines for the treatment of fungal allergy.

INTRODUCTION

Already at the beginning of the 18th century, long before the term "allergy" was coined by Clemens von Pirquet, fungal exposure was recognized as a potential cause of adverse respiratory symptoms.1 In 1726, Sir Floyer reported for the first time a severe asthma attack in a patient who had visited a wine cellar where must was fermenting.2 More than 100 years later, Blackley described bronchial catarrh and chest tightness after inhalation of Penicillium glaucum spores.3 In 1924, Storm van Leeuwen suggested that inhaled fungal spores could cause asthma.

Although the first observation of fungal allergy dates back 300 years, the association between exposure to fungi and the occurrence of allergic symptoms has been discussed controversially for a long time, and indeed fungi are still a neglected allergen source.4,5,6 Nowadays, data from several epidemiological studies provide evidence for the important role of fungi in respiratory disease in the indoor as well as in the outdoor environment. Fungal sensitization is not only found more often in patients with asthma but also may represent a risk factor for development of asthma.7,8 Moldy odor, home dampness and visible mould growth have been associated with the development of asthma and the severity of respiratory symptoms in children.9 Indoor exposure to fungi was further found to be a risk factor for the prevalence of coughing, increased peak expiratory flow variability, and asthma.10,11,12,13,14 A correlation was found between spore levels and the occurrence of hospital delivery and asthma treatment, but also with asthma-related death. In Chicago, for example, death from asthma was about twice as common on days with a high total mold spore count as on days with lower spore counts.15 In rural areas, respiratory symptoms have been linked to increased amounts of spores during crop ripening, harvest, and storage.16,17,18 Furthermore, thunderstorm-related asthma was found to be associated with increased spore concentrations of fungal species from Ascomycota and Basidiomycota.19

The importance of molds to induce IgE-mediated reactions was demonstrated by IgE binding experiments, the ability to induce histamine release in basophils from sensitized patients and by skin testing.20,21,22,23 Bronchial and nasal challenge tests with extracts of fungal spores or mycel were able to induce rhinitis, asthma,23,24 and late phase reactions including eosinophilic infiltration.25,26 The fact that extracts of spores and mycel are able to efficiently induce allergic symptoms provided evidence that relevant allergens are present in both spores and mycel.22,23 For Alt a 1, the major Alternaria alternata allergen, the presence in spores and mycel has further been demonstrated by immunogold electron microscopy.27,28,29 Interestingly, fungi also activate the innate immune system and may enhance inflammation caused by unrelated allergens (e.g., grass pollen).30,31,32

A prerequisite for the development of allergic sensitization is that individuals are exposed to the allergen source in clinically relevant amounts. Fungal spores are an ever present component of the atmosphere,18 constituting the largest proportion of aerobiological particles in our environment33 which even exceeds the concentration of pollen grains.17 Due to the large spectrum of mold species and the difficulty in identifying them our knowledge of outdoor atmospheric mold spores and their relevance in allergic disease is still incomplete. A recent study identified a set of 40 potentially allergy-inducing genera in air samples collected in Korea.34

Using DNA analysis differences in the relative abundance and seasonal cycles of various groups of fungi in coarse and fine particulate matter were found, with more plant pathogens in the coarse fraction and more human pathogens and allergens in the respirable fine particle fraction (<3 micron).35

The number of fungal spores in the atmosphere underlies seasonal as well as interdural variations. Especially climatic factors (temperature, rainfall, relative humidity, and wind) and circadian patterns (darkness and sunlight) influence the spectrum of fungal species and their concentrations in the environment.16,33,36,37 The number of spores in the air rises in particular in late summer and early autumn, when nutritional sources are available, while they diminish in winter (Fig. 1).16,37 Considering daily fluctuations, the highest spore counts can be found in the afternoon and early evening.16

Fig. 1

Seasonal variations influence the number of spores in the atmosphere. The climatic conditions in summer and autumn favour the growth of certain fungal species and the dispersal of spores. Exceptional high concentrations of spores from the species Alternaria and Cladosporium as well as from species of the phylum Basidiomycota can be found from June to October (modified after Lacey J, 1996).

In general, exposure to fungi occurs via inhalation, skin contact, or ingestion.38 The inhalative route is with regard to respiratory symptoms the most important one. Fungal spores show a broad spectrum of different shapes and sizes, ranging from less than 2 to 250 µm. A substantial proportion of spores are small enough to penetrate into the lower airways. The threshold level necessary to elicit allergic symptoms in sensitized patients is not known and varies between different species. Spore concentrations of Alternaria equal or greater than 100 spores/m3 are believed to evoke allergic symptoms,39 whereas the reference value for Cladosporium is estimated to be 3,000 spores/m3.18,33 However, for 2 reasons the determination of spore concentrations is not a perfect method to quantify the exposure of a sensitized individual. Using a Halogen Immunoassay (HIA), it was shown that fungal fragments and submicron particles of intra- and extracellular fungal structures contain detectable amounts of allergens and may therefore function as aeroallergen sources.40 These particles are present in considerable larger quantities than spores, and respiratory deposition models indicate for some fungal species a much higher burden caused by fragments than by spores.41 Second, there is evidence that airborne allergen levels do not always correspond to spore or particle counts.42,43 For example, it has been shown that depending on the developmental status, spores from Alternaria alternata release different amounts of the major allergen Alt a 1.44

Prevalence of sensitization

Fungi are ubiquitous and, as a consequence of this, sensitization to fungi can be found throughout the world (Fig. 2). The exact prevalence of mold sensitization is not known but is estimated to range from 3% to 10% in the general population. Likewise, the prevalence of sensitization in atopic patients varies depending on many factors as it was exemplified in several large studies.45,46,47,48,49 A multicenter study in 7 European countries investigated the prevalence of Alternaria and Cladosporium sensitization in 877 children and adults (5-60 years) with rhinits and/or asthma. From these, approximately 9.5% were skin prick positive to at least one or both fungal species. The highest prevalence was found in Spain (20%), the lowest in Portugal (3%).50 In another very recent multinational study (EPAAC, Early Prevention of Asthma in Atopic Children) conducted in 10 European countries, Australia, and South Africa, specific IgE antibodies to food and aeroallergens were determined in 2,184 infants (mean age: 17.6 months) with atopic eczema. The overall sensitization rate to Alternaria in this population was 3.7%, but variations were observed between the different countries. Children from Australia showed the highest sensitization rate (7%), whereas in Belgium no sensitization to Alternaria was found.51 The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the USA revealed that approximately 12.9% of the population (6-59 years) showed positive skin prick results to Alternaria alternata.52 A survey performed by Global Allergy and Asthma European Network in 16 European countries showed general sensitization rates of 11.9% for Alternaria alternata and 5.8% for Cladosporium herbarum with the highest prevalence in the UK, Ireland, and Northern Europe.45 A study performed with atopic patients in a tropic environment demonstrated the importance of sensitization to basidiomycete Ganoderma applanatum with the prevalence of 30%.53 In those studies, populations from different countries have been investigated that varied in age and clinical manifestations of allergy. Thus, it seems that demographic and epidemiological factors contribute to varying prevalence data. Based on studies that consider the age of patients in the evaluation of prevalence data, it was assumed that sensitization to fungi is an age-dependent process with a higher prevalence in children.11,51,52,53,54,55,56,57 It was further shown for allergy to the species Alternaria that the course of the disease differed markedly from allergies to other common aeroallergens.58 Alternaria-specific IgE antibodies increase significantly in early childhood until they reach a maximum level and then seem to decline again with increasing age.11,55,56,57,58 In contrast to this, specific IgE antibodies to house dust mite increase with age and remain constantly high during childhood.11 It is interesting that monosensitization to fungi is quite rare and that specific IgE to fungi are often associated with the presence of specific IgE to other aeroallergens.54,59 So far, the reason for this polysensitization in connection with fungal sensitization is not known. A study in 6,840 Italian children pointed also at the influence of genetic factors, as 82.9% of mold-sensitized children had a positive family history of mold allergy.59

Fig. 2

Geographical distribution of fungal allergy. Fungal allergy represents a worldwide health problem. The world map highlights in yellow all countries in which sensitization to fungi has been described.

The varying prevalences of mold sensitization may also be ascribed to methodological limitations. Current methods for identification of mold species rely especially on morphological characteristics of spores, so they are time-consuming and require the skills of a trained person. As only a small number of mold species have been identified, sensitization to unknown fungi remains elusive. Furthermore, one has to be aware of the fact that results of skin tests and in vitro measurements of specific IgE antibodies are often not directly comparable.57,60,61 Finally, fungal allergen extracts used for diagnostic testing are of poor quality and show high variability regarding allergen contents.62 Although at present the prevalence of sensitization to fungi can only be estimated, many studies identify fungi as an important cause of respiratory allergy.

Fungal allergens

It has been estimated that around 1 to 1.5 million fungal species exist worldwide, but so far only 80,000 have been described. From these, 112 genera are thought to be a source of allergens. The 4 genera most commonly associated with the development of allergy are Alternaria,54 Cladosporium, Penicillium, and Aspergillus. These genera belong to the phyllum Ascomycota, but allergens have also been described from Basidiomycota and Zygomycota. Overall, 107 allergens from 28 fungal genera have been approved by the International Allergen Nomenclature Sub-committee (http://www.allergen.org/, Fig. 3), but many fungal proteins have been shown to be IgE-reactive. Bowyer et al.38 estimated that the most thoroughly studied allergenic fungi have up to 20 well characterized allergens and further 27 to 60 other less well characterized IgE binding proteins. Recently, it was shown that IgE sensitization to fungal species reflected well their phylogenetic relationship since IgE reactivity correlated better in closely related molds compared to phylogenetically distant molds.63 Supplementary Table 1 summarizes known fungal allergens and gives an overview on their biological function, their prevalence of IgE recognition, and their cross-reactivity.

Fig. 3

Fungal species as a source of type I allergy. The taxonomical tree includes all allergen producing fungal species that have been approved by the I.U.I.S. Allergen Nomenclature Sub-committee (http://www.allergen.org).

Although molds produce a great variety of IgE-binding molecules, not all of them are equally important. The first factor that determines the importance of an allergen is the prevalence of recognition among patients sensitized to the allergen source. Based on this, an allergen can be classified as major (>50%) or minor (<50%) allergen. However, it is known that IgE reactivity of an allergen does not necessarily reflect its capacity to induce allergic symptoms. Determination of the IgE-binding capacity is therefore not sufficient for assessing the clinical relevance of an allergen. It is rather the capability to induce strong IgE-mediated and T cell-mediated reactions that define the clinical relevance. The ability of an allergen to induce IgE-mediated reactions can be assessed by in vitro (basophil histamine release) and in vivo tests (skin and provocation tests). Additionally, T-cell proliferation assays (in vitro) and the atopy patch test (in vivo) allow inferences on T cell-mediated processes.

The clinical relevance is further dictated by the frequency of the allergen's occurrence and the amount of allergen liberated by a mold species. Molds and fragments thereof are not only a constant component of our environment, but under certain conditions that favor their growth (i.e. moisture, poor ventilation, etc.) exposure may be exceptionally high. Antibody probes against mold allergens are useful tools to determine the presence of a certain fungus and to measure the personal allergen exposure.

The molecular nature of fungal allergens

Knowledge about the sequence and structure of an allergen forms the basis for the understanding of its immunological and biological properties and ultimately is essential for the development of new forms of diagnosis and treatment.64 To study these characteristics, the allergen needs to be available with a high degree of purity. First allergen characterizations were carried out on natural allergens isolated from allergen extracts, but complex and tedious purification processes hampered such analysis for many allergen sources. With the introduction of recombinant DNA technology into the field of allergology, an ongoing progress in allergen characterization started more than 25 years ago. Today, many mold allergens have already been cloned (Supplementary Table 1) and are available as recombinant proteins. The amino acid sequence of an allergen determines its physiochemical characteristics and forms the basis of the secondary and tertiary structures. So far, the 3 dimensional structures of some mold allergens have been solved by X-ray crystallography.65,66,67,68,69,70 Computational structure prediction programs in principle allow predictions of the allergen's conformation based on the amino acid sequence. Knowledge of the sequence further facilitates the identification of amino acids involved in IgE binding and T-cell activation.71 Currently increasing numbers of B and T-cell epitopes of allergens from different mould species are determined.72,73

Furthermore, the knowledge about similarities in sequence and conformation also permits the identification of homologous proteins in related and unrelated species, which might have cross-reactive potential. However, one has to be aware of the fact that the degree of sequence identity between an allergen and a homologous protein does not necessarily predict cross-reactivity. Overall, cross-reactivity between proteins can be due to common moieties in the protein sequence or to common carbohydrate structures (CCD, cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant). It can thus occur between proteins from taxonomically related, but also from distantly or non-related sources. Hence, cross-reactivity has been found within 1 fungal phylum, between different fungal phyla and also to non-fungal allergens of other allergen sources74 and even to human proteins. The most prominent examples of cross-reactive fungal allergens are enolases,75,76,77 manganese superoxide dismutases (MnSOD),78 cyclophilins,66,79,80 glutathione-S-transferases,81 thioredoxins,67,82 and transaldolases.83 Beside these, serine proteases, ribosomal proteins, heat shock proteins, and peroxisomal proteins have found to be cross-reactive (see supplementary Table 1). Clinically, cross-reactive molecules are responsible for IgE-mediated reactions to a variety of allergen sources. Cross-reactive molecules with poor allergenic activity (e.g., CCDs) can influence the accuracy of diagnosis since tests based on IgE binding give positive results that do not reflect the clinical importance of the allergens. In addition, the relevance of CCDs in eliciting IgE-mediated reactions is still a matter of controversy and, although many mold species produce glycosylated proteins that bind IgE in vitro, it is not clear whether the carbohydrate moiety contributes to the allergenicity of the molecule. The lack of biological activity might be due to a limited epitope valency of carbohydrates and/or a low affinity of IgE antibodies for the corresponding glycan epitope.84,85 In case of plant carbohydrates, structures that are crucial for IgE antibody binding have been determined: asparagine-linked xylose and fucose residues are mainly responsible for structural similarities which cause cross-reactivity.84,85 In contrast to plant carbohydrates, mold proteins are highly mannosylated, indicating that plant and fungal CCDs are not cross-reactive; however, further research is required to address this issue.

Knowledge about an allergen's sequence can give information regarding the biological and biochemical properties of a protein. Since molds are heterotrophic organisms, they are dependent on organic nutrients provided by other organisms. They digest their food externally, excreting enzymes into the environment.33 It is therefore not surprising that many fungal allergens have enzymatic functions. However, enzymatic activity may also have an influence on the allergenicity of an allergen source. First, proteases of fungal extracts were shown to have Th2-inducing properties86 either by facilitating antigen access through cleavage of tight junction proteins87 or through direct activation of epithelial cells.87,88,89,90,91,92,93 Second, degradation processes can impair the stability of other allergens present in an allergen source.

To summarize, the knowledge regarding the structures, immunological and biological properties of mold allergens is increasing, but there is a need for the systematic evaluation of the prevalence of IgE recognition of individual allergens in population studies and of the allergenic activity of allergens to determine their clinical relevance. Only on the basis of such systematic studies, new forms of diagnosis and therapy can be developed.

Precise diagnosis of fungal allergy is the basis for immunotherapy

The first and most important step toward efficient allergen-specific forms of treatment is the proper diagnosis of mold sensitization and the evaluation of the clinical relevance of the sensitizing allergens. Diagnosis of allergies, as routinely performed today, is a stepwise process, including anamnesis, determination of total and allergen-specific IgE antibodies, skin tests and, if necessary, other provocation tests.94 Anamnesis plays a decisive role in the diagnosis of allergy and usually guides further diagnostic steps, such as serological testing and provocation testing. However, if fungal allergy is not considered, it may be easily overlooked because fungal allergens often co-occur with other frequent indoor (e.g., house dust mites, animal dander) and outdoor allergens (grass and weed pollen). In fact, many of the mold-sensitized patients have also specific IgE antibodies to other inhalant allergen sources, and peak spore levels overlap with grass and weed pollen season, so mold sensitization might be masked by other allergies (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Fungal spore seasons overlap with grass and weed pollen seasons. Diagnosis of fungal allergy is complicated by the fact that mould allergic patients are often polysensitized. Exacerbated allergic symptoms in summer and autumn might be due to fungal allergy, but can also arise from allergy to grasses and weeds like mugwort (Artemisia), ragweed (Ambrosia) or Parietaria. The intensity of allergen exposure to grasses, weeds and moulds is displayed in red for high exposure, orange for intermediate exposure and yellow for low exposure.

Allergen-specific IgE antibodies and their clinical relevance are basically determined by serological investigations and skin tests. In general, skin tests are more commonly found to correlate with clinical symptoms of allergy and are regarded as the more sensitive tests, whereas serological investigations are considered more specific.95 A combination of in vivo and in vitro tests is therefore recommended for a reliable diagnosis of mold allergy.96 A recent study on diagnosis of mold allergy compared the sensitivity of an intradermal skin test with a serum assay for specific IgE antibodies (ImmunoCAP test) and showed impressively the gap between in vivo and in vitro results. Seventy-five patients with rhinitis were tested with extracts of Candida, Alternaria, Cladosporium, and Penicillium for their IgE reactivity. The incidence of a positive test determined by skin tests in comparison to the CAP analysis varied fewest for Cladosporium (4-fold) and the most for Alternaria (17.5-fold).61 A multicenter study from Spain which determined the prevalence of Alternaria alternata sensitization revealed that in more than one-third of patients, a positive in vivo result could not be confirmed with the in vitro tests.57

The discrepancy of diagnostic tests can partly be ascribed to the poor quality of mold extracts.95 Besides intrinsic factors, like strain variabilities97,98,99,100,101,102 and the tendency of molds for spontaneous mutation,103 the raw material (spores/mycelium)20,21,22 and manufacturing processes (culturing conditions, extracting procedures)28,97,99,100,104,105 affect the quality of mold allergen extracts. As molds are enzyme-rich organisms, degradation processes should also not be underestimated.97,99,100,102,104 All these factors may have an impact on the presence of certain allergens, protein/carbohydrate content, and allergenicity and antigenicity of mold extracts.28,97,98,99,100,104,105 Martínez et al.101 reported high variabilities in the expression of the major allergen Alt a 1 in 11 Alternaria alternata strains that were cultured under identical conditions. In the same mold species, Sáenz-de-Santamaria et al.102 observed varying enzymatic activities in 14 strains. Portnoy et al.104 revealed that extraction time influences the elution of certain allergens and that a longer extraction interval increases the proportion of carbohydrates. We investigated the influence of mold strains, growth medium, and growth time on the expression of Alternaria alternata allergens. Four Alternaria strains were cultured for 2 or 4 weeks on 3 media that differed in carbohydrate and protein content as well as in the presence of additional nutrients. The immunblot in Fig. 5 displays the enormous impact of the strains, nutritional sources, and growth periods on the prescence of IgE-reactive proteins in the allergen extracts. It also exemplifies the difficulties in defining optimal growth conditions.

Fig. 5

Influence of strain variabilities and growth conditions on the presence of IgE binding proteins in extracts of Alternaria alternata. Four Alternaria strains, achieved by the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS 103.33, CBS 795.72) and the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 46582 and ATCC 96154) were grown on 3 different media (C, Czapek Dox agar; ME, Malt Extract agar; S, Sabauroud agar) for 2 or 4 weeks respectively. Protein extracts of the fungi were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and incubated with the serum of an Alternaria-sensitized patient. Bound IgE antibodies were detected with 125I-labelled anti-human IgE antibodies and visualized by autoradiography

Although commercially available allergen solutions have to pass through some company-internal standardization procedures and quality controls, there are until now no generally accepted guidelines for the preparation of allergenic mould extracts. Determination of the protein content and measurement of total IgE activity seem to be unsuitable, as protein concentration might not necessarily be correlated with the allergenicity of the extract, since significant qualitative differences in allergen composition have been described.21,97,98,104 It is therefore not astonishing that considerable differences in potency of mold extracts between manufacturers and even batch-to-batch variations can be found in these so-called "standardized extracts".62,97,106 Vailes et al.106 determined the content of Alt a 1 and Asp f 1 in extracts of Alternaria alternata and Aspergillus fumigatus used for diagnosis in the United States. The extracts were obtained in 2 consecutive years from 8 different manufactures. Whereas Alt a 1 was detectable in all but 1 extract, the amount of Asp f 1 was low or even undetectable in extracts of 4 companies. Furthermore, substantial variations within and between companies were found for Asp f 1. Due to the problems with standardization of mold extracts, only a limited number of them are available for diagnosis. This has certainly contributed to the fact that mold allergy has been underestimated for a long time.

Besides the inconsistency of allergen extracts, the presence of carbohydrates and other cross-reactive components hampers the precise identification of the disease eliciting mold species. Molds are known to contain many glycosylated proteins that might impair diagnostic tests. False positive results due to carbohydrates can be unveiled in in vivo provocation tests, since it is assumed that anti-carbohydrate IgE antibodies lack biological relevance. However, cross-reactive allergens from related and unrelated allergen sources distract from the primary sensitizing source. Especially in case of polysensitized patients, diagnosis based on extracts allows no discrimination between co- and cross-sensitization. The need for an improved component-resolved diagnosis is therefore evident, and it is clear that improvement can only come from the use of recombinant mold allergens.

In fact, allergens from different mold species have been cloned and produced as recombinant IgE-reactive proteins (see supplementary Table 1). For some of them, the ability to induce immediate-type reactions has been demonstrated by basophil histamine release assays and skin prick tests.107,108 Recombinant allergens with similar characteristics as their natural counterpart are suited for in vitro and in vivo diagnosis. The application of species-specific allergens (like Alt a 1, Asp f 1, Cop c 1, or Mala s 1) allows the identification of genuine sensitization to a single mold species. Recombinant mold allergens with known cross-reactivity are additionally useful tools as marker allergens to identify cross-sensitization. In this way, sensitivity as well as specificity of diagnosis can be improved. This concept has been tested in a small group of patients sensitized to Alternaria alternata. A combination of the species-specific major allergen Alt a 1 with the cross-reactive enolase Alt a 6 (formerly Alt a 2) could correctly diagnose sensitization in 7 tested patients.109 Recently, a study including 80 European patients showed that rAlt a 1 can be used to diagnose 98% of patients with allergy to Alternaria alternata and that almost all specific IgE in these patients was directed against Alt a 1.72 This finding suggests that Alt a 1 can be used as a reliable diagnostic marker allergen for genuine sensitisation to Alternaria and could replace the Alternaria extract. However, another study suggested that a recently cloned cross-reactive allergen from Alternaria alternata, namely MnSOD, should be included together with Alt a 1 and Alt a 6 in the molecular array for the diagnosis of allergy to Pleosporaceae since 2 out of 30 patients did not react to Alt a 1 nor to Alt a 6, but they showed reactivity to MnSOD.110 In another study, 2 recombinant proteins from Aspergillus fumigatus, rAsp f 4 and rAsp f 6, were shown to allow the discrimination between allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and Aspergillus sensitization.108 Sensitization to certain mold allergens may also be used to predict the severity of clinical symptoms. Alternaria alternata sensitized patients were reported to be affected more frequently by asthma than non-Alternaria-sensitized patients.111

In summary, mold allergy has long been underestimated and occurs more frequently than expected. Since mold allergic patients are often polysensitized, IgE antibodies to other allergen sources might mask mold allergy. Therefore, the precise determination of the disease-causing allergen source is particularly important for mold allergy and is the basis to correctly prescribe the most appropriate specific forms of treatment.

Immunotherapy of mold allergy

Treatment of allergic disease is based on pharmacotherapy, allergen avoidance and immunotherapy.112 Whereas pharmaceutical drugs like steroids and antihistamines can solely abate the symptoms of allergic disease, allergen avoidance is in case of outdoor exposure difficult to achieve.113 In case of indoor exposure, avoidance is possible under certain conditions, such as visible mold growth.114 Specific immunotherapy would be an antigen-specific, long-lasting and disease-modifying approach for the treatment of mold allergy. In 1998, the WHO published a position paper with guidelines for safe and effective immunotherapy. These guidelines stressed the point that immunotherapy should only be performed with well-defined vaccines in carefully selected patients.112 In case of mold allergy, these criteria are difficult to fulfill and therefore - strictly speaking - immunotherapy is currently not recommended for mold allergic patients. First, mold allergen extracts remain ill-defined mixtures of allergenic and non-allergenic components. They contain a very complex spectrum of proteins, glycoproteins, carbohydrates, and other components that definitely do not contribute to the allergenicity of the whole extract but might lead to impaired diagnostic tests or to side effects during treatment. Second, the selection of patients for immunotherapy is impaired by the fact that many mould allergic patients suffer from asthma and are sensitized to other common inhalant allergens.54 Although immunotherapy has been shown to be effective for the treatment of allergic asthma, especially this group of patients is prone to develop adverse reactions during treatment. Therefore, clinical manifestations of asthma have been considered rather as a contraindication for immunotherapy.115 Nevertheless, studies with mold extracts, predominately Alternaria and Cladosporium species, have been performed (Table 1). We found 6 studies which evaluated the safety of immunotherapy using mold extracts.116,117,118,119,120,121 In 1982, Kaad and Ostergaard treated 38 children with an Alternaria iridis extract mixed with a Cladosporium herbarum extract over a period of 3.5 years. Nineteen percent of the patients had to stop treatment because of severe side reactions associated with the generation of precipitating serum antibodies.116 Four years later, the same authors reported more severe and even anaphylactic reactions to Alternaria and Cladosporium extracts than to extracts of grass pollen, animal dander, or house dust mite in asthmatic children resistant to pharmacological treatment. Since 50% of patients had to be withdrawn from treatment, the authors concluded that immunotherapy in asthmatics with mold allergy is not recommended.117 These results were further confirmed by a retrospective study with 83 adults and 46 children with rhinitis and/or bronchial asthma. Using a biologically standardized depot extract of Alternaria tenuis, 39.5% of patients experienced adverse reactions which were mainly systemic. Children and patients with asthma were at higher risk of developing side effects.119 Moreno et al.120 investigated the safety of 4 different induction schedules in 108 patients (see Table 1). Only a few adverse reactions to an extract of Alternaria tenuis were reported which were associated with only 1 induction schedule. Finally, Martínez-Canavate et al.121 compared the tolerance of a conventional short regime to a cluster regime in a pediatric population. Whereas more local reactions were observed in the conventional regime, no significant differences between the 2 regimes were found regarding systemic reactions. In total, 10 (10.6%) out of 94 patients had local or systemic reactions and 1 patient from the cluster regime had to be withdrawn from treatment.

Table 1A

Immunotherapy studies with fungal extracts

Design of study	Mould species	Schedule	No. of patients	Side-effects		Withdrawal due to side-effects	Ref.
				Local	Systemic
Retrospective	Alternaria alternata	SIT, cluster	52	1	3	1	[121]
		SIT, conventional short	42	4	2
Retrospective	Alternaria tenuis	SIT, cluster	108			0	[120]
		4 visits/10 injections	60	1	2
		4 visits/8 injections	9	0	0
		3 visits/9 injections	6	0	0
		3 visits/6 injections	33	0	0
Retrospective	Alternaria tenuis	SIT, conventional	129	3	48	n.k.	[119]
Prospective	Alternaria iridis/alternata	SIT, conventional	13	n.k.	n.k.	4	[117]
	Cladosporium herbarum		13	n.k.	n.k.	9
Prospective	Alternaria iridis mixed with Cladosporium herbarum	SIT, conventional	38	n.k.	n.k.	7	[116]

SIT, Specific immunotherapy.

Table 1B

Immunotherapy studies with fungal extracts

Design of study	Mould species	Schedule	No. of patients active/placebo	Clinical effect	Immunological effects	Side-effects		Ref.
						Local	Systemic
DB, PC	C. herbarum	SIT, cluster	16/14	medication score↓	IgE↓, IgG↑	4*	13	[122,123]
				bronchial sensitivity↓
DB, PC	C. herbarum	SIT, cluster	11/11	symptom medication score↓	IgE↓	8	11	[124,125,126,127]
				PEF↑	IgG1 and IgG4↑
				skin reactivity↓
DB, PC	Alternaria sp.	SIT, rush	13/11	global symptom medication score↓	IgG↑	0	2	[128]
				skin reactivity↓
				nasal tolerance↑
DB, PC	A. alternata	SLIT	19/20	symptom medication score↓	IgG4↑		8	[129]
				skin reactivity↓
				respiratory tolerance↑ (challenge)
DB, PC	A. alternata	SIT, conventional	14/14	conjunctival sensitivity↓	IgE↓	0	2	[131,132]
				PEF↑	IgG, IgG1 and IgG4↑
DB, PC	A. alternata	SIT, conventional	30/20	symptom medication score↓	IgE↓	7	0	[133]
				nasal tolerance↑
Case control	A. tenuis	SIT, conventional	39/40	symptom score↓	n.k.	+	0	[134]
				medication score↓
Open control	A. tenuis	SIT, conventional	11	skin reactivity↓	IgE↓	2	2	[39]
				symtom score↓	IgG and IgG4↑
				medication score↓
		SLIT	12	symtom score↓		0	0	[39]
				medication score↓
				nasal tolerance↑
Open control	A. alternata	SIT, conventional	9/7	bronchial sensitivity↓	IgE↓			[135]

*number of reactions.

n.k., not known; DB, PC, double blind placebo-controlled; C. herbarum, Cladosporium herbarum; Alternaria sp., Alternaria species; A. alternata, Alternaria alternata; A. tenuis, Alternaria tenuis; SIT, subcutaneous immunotherapy; SLIT, sublingual immunotherapy; PEF, peak expiratory flow.

Based on the high incidence of adverse reactions, mold extracts were stated as "less tolerated" than other allergen extracts.117,119 Therefore, only a few double-blind, placebo controlled studies have been performed so far that analyze the clinical and immunological efficacy of mold immunotherapy. In 1986, Dreborg et al.122 treated 16 children actively over a period of 10 months with a standardized Cladosporium herbarum extract, while 14 children received a histamine placebo. All the children were polysensitized and suffered from rhinoconjunctivits and/or mold-induced asthma. Symptom scores and total medication score remained unchanged in both groups after 6 months of treatment. Although skin reactivity, conjunctival sensitivity, and peak expiratory flow improved, no significant differences were found between the actively treated and placebo groups. However, a significant reduction in bronchial and conjunctival sensitivity as well as a significant decrease in specific IgE antibodies could be observed in the extract-treated group after 10 months of treatment. A drawback was the high frequency of systemic side effects, which occurred in 81% of patients, especially during the peak of mold season.122,123 In a similar approach with Cladosporium herbarum, the efficacy of immunotherapy was evaluated in 11 adult asthmatics. After 5 to 7 months of treatment, no differences were found between the active and placebo-treated groups when the symptom and medication score were evaluated separately. A combined evaluation revealed that 81% of the C. herbarum treated group and 27% of the placebo control group had unchanged or improved symptoms.124 A significant decrease in bronchial and dermal sensitivity as well as a significant increase in specific IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies was observed in the actively treated group.125,126 Furthermore, a significant decrease in histamine release was reported from basophils isolated from patients of the actively treated group.127 Local side effects were reported in 70% and systemic reactions in 100% of the C. herbarum treated group.124 Immunotherapy with a standardized extract of Alternaria alternata resulted in an improved symptom-medication score, an increased tolerance in nasal provocation tests, and reduced skin reactivity in the actively treated group. Specific IgG antibodies increased significantly after 1 year of treatment, specific IgE antibodies did not change in either group.128 Criado Molina et al.129 evaluated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with Alternaria alternata in a sublingual approach. Nineteen out of 38 patients received over a period of 12 months oral immunotherapy, whereas the control group was symptomatically treated. Eight adverse reactions occurred that were described as mild to moderate. Skin and bronchial reactivity were significantly improved in the actively treated group, and an increase in specific IgG4 antibodies was observed. Peak expiratory flow and specific IgE antibody levels remained unchanged in both groups. Another double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 2008 and included 28 patients. Fourteen patients were treated with a conventional schedule of subcutaneous immunotherapy, the control group received a histamine placebo. The allergen extract applied was a biologically standardized preparation of Alternaria alternata. The highest maintenance dose that induces no systemic side reactions was evaluated in an earlier study before the immunotherapy trial.130 Over a period of 12 months, no local but 2 systemic reactions were reported in asthmatic patients. The major significant improvements for the Alternaria-treated group were an increase in peak expiratory flow and a decrease in severity of asthma.131 No changes in nasal or ocular symptoms as well as in medication scores could be observed. Allergen-specific IgE antibodies decreased, whereas antibody titers of total and specific IgG (IgG1 and IgG4) increased.132 A double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 50 children and adolescents (30 active group, 20 placebo group) with A. alternata-related seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma. Standardized A. alternata extract were injected over 3 years according to the conventional schedule of subcutaneous immunotherapy. A group that received active therapy resulted in improved quality of life regarding asthma and decreased sensitivity upon nasal challenge. The combined symptom medication score decreased in years 2 (38.7%) and 3 (63.5%) of the study. No severe side effects were observed while mild local reactions were reported in 7 patients.133

Besides these double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, a few open studies have been performed. Thirty-nine children with rhinitis and/or Alternaria-induced asthma were enrolled together with 40 age-matched controls in a prospective immunotherapy study. After 3 years of therapy, all patients in the active group reported clinical improvement in a questionnaire, while the symptoms worsened in 87.5% of control patients. The clinical effect seemed to be dose-dependent as patients receiving higher cumulative doses improved considerably.134 Bernardis et al.39 compared the efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SIT) to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using an extract of Alternaria tenuis. Eleven patients were randomized to the SIT group and 12 to the SLIT group. Although SLIT was very well tolerated, the SIT approach seemed to be more efficient. In both approaches, patients subjectively reported an improvement in symptom medication scores. The threshold to elicit allergic symptoms by nasal provocation test increased in both groups but reached only statistically significance in the SLIT group. However, skin reactivity and IgE levels significantly decreased only in the SIT group, whereas total IgG and specific IgG4 levels increased. Nevertheless, side effects occurred in approximately 36.4% of patients treated with SIT. Recently, Kilic et al.135 evaluated efficacy of SIT in 16 children with bronchial asthma monosensitized to Alternaria in a prospective, open parallel group-controlled study. After 1 year of treatment with Alternatia extracts, a reduction in bronchial responsiveness, a reduction in eosinophil counts in sputum and a decrease in specific IgE levels were found in the actively treated group. In summary, improvements in symptoms have been observed in SIT studies for mold allergy and one can therefore assume that SIT should be effective for mold allergy as it is for many other allergens. However, progress seems to be limited by natural allergen extracts which induce side effects and are of poor quality. It will therefore be necessary to use recombinant mold allergen derivatives with reduced allergenic activity or mold allergen-derived peptides for treatment.

Strategies for the improvement of mold allergy immunotherapy

Available data suggests that the insufficient quality of natural mold allergen extracts is the major bottleneck for the development of safe and effective SIT for mold allergy. Especially during the SIT of mold allergy, the occurrence of local and severe systemic side reactions was found to hamper the application of sufficiently high allergen doses needed for efficient therapy (see Table 1). Improvements are therefore needed that allow the safe administration of sufficiently high doses. Furthermore, all disease-relevant allergens must be included in vaccines which often cannot be achieved with allergen extracts that lack certain allergens.

Recombinant allergens

The cDNA sequences of many mold allergens have already been elucidated (see supplementary Table 1), and by using various expression systems recombinant molecules can be produced in large quantities and high purity. Recombinant wilde-type allergens, which resemble immunologically their natural counterpart, represent valuable tools for specific diagnosis, as they can be used in diagnostic tests to determine the disease-causing allergen source. Using component-resolved diagnosis, relevant recombinant allergens can be selected for allergen SIT. The feasibility of this approach has already been shown in case of grass pollen and birch pollen allergens, but so far recombinant allergens have not yet been evaluated for the treatment of mould allergies.

However, when the use of recombinant wild-type allergens is considered for SIT, one has to be aware that the administration of a recombinant allergen mimicking the characteristics of the natural allergen carries the risk of inducing allergic reactions similar as with allergen extracts. Adverse reaction might particularly pose a problem in case of mold allergy, as many patients suffer from severe symptoms. Therefore, the development of genetically modified allergen variants with reduced allergenic activity (hypoallergenic derivatives) represents a desirable approach.136,137

Recombinant hypoallergenic allergen derivatives and peptide-based allergen vaccines

The main strategy behind recombinant hypoallergens is the elimination of IgE reactivity while retaining T-cell reactivity. The disruption of IgE-binding epitopes can be achieved by (1) introduction of point mutations, (2) deletion of IgE reactive parts, (3) fragmentation of allergens, (4) reassembling of allergens in the form of mosaic molecules, (5) oligomerisation of allergens, and (6) chemical denaturation of allergens.138 Hypoallergenic derivatives exhibit a reduced or even abolished IgE reactivity and hence do not induce IgE-mediated side effects when administered to the patient. Immunologically, they may induce T-cell modulatory activities and the production of blocking antibodies due to the presence of T-cell and B-cell epitopes.

In addition, there are currently 2 strategies based on the use of allergen-derived peptides under investigation, which differ fundamentally in their immunological mode of action: a T-cell and a B-cell epitope approach. Regarding the first, T cell epitope-containing peptides (10-12 amino acids) are designed to lack IgE-binding epitopes and are thought to act via the induction of tolerance or anergy. Administration of such peptides in clinical studies proved the lack of IgE-mediated adverse events, but a drawback was the occurrence of late-phase reactions.139,140 For the second approach, peptides (20-40 amino acids) derived from IgE-binding sites on the surface of the allergen are taken and fused with an allergen-unrelated carrier molecule with the aim to induce upon immunization IgG antibodies which are directed toward IgE-binding sites on the allergen and hence block IgE binding to the natural allergen.72,141 They rely on the principle that peptides which are taken from the IgE-binding sites themselves do not react with IgE and therefore are unable to trigger IgE-mediated side effects. The peptides are also selected to contain as little as possible remaining allergen-specific T cell epitopes to also avoid the induction of late-phase reactions due to activation of allergen-specific T cells upon administration to the patient.142,143 To induce allergen-specific IgG, the allergen-derived peptides are bound to carrier molecules that provide T-cell help. In the beginning peptides were coupled chemically to KLH (keyhole limpet hemocyanin), a protein from the mollusc Megathura crenulata but the vaccines which are currently in clinical trial are based on recombinant fusion proteins consisting of a viral carrier proteins which are fused to the allergen peptides to facilitate reproducible large-scale production under good manufacturing practice (GMP).141,144 The latter strategy holds promise that vaccines can be developed which can be given as few high dose injections (3-4 per year) to patients without inducing severe systemic side effects and therefore may be particularly suitable for the treatment of mold-sensitized patients, who often suffer from severe symptoms (e.g., asthma) and are at high risk of developing adverse reactions.

Outlook: Vaccines for mold allergy

Although fungi have been underestimated allergen sources, the sequences of an increasing number of mold allergens are becoming available and in particular the major allergens from some of the most important allergenic molds have been characterized.5,6 Also our knowledge of IgE and T-cell epitopes of mold allergens increases. By using short synthetic peptides, IgE-binding epitopes of Alt a 1,145,146 Asp f 2, Cla h 6, Pen ch 13,147 and Pen n 18148 have been determined. Based on this information, hypoallergens or hypoallergenic derivatives can be developed. For example, deletion of amino acids from the N- and C-terminus of Asp f 2 abrogated IgE binding in sera from Aspergillus-sensitized patients.149 A lower IgE reactivity was also obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of the Malassezia sympodialis allergen Mala s 11150 and the Penicillium crysogenum allergen Pen ch 18.151 The insertion of 2 mutations in an IgE-reactive fragment of Alt a 13 resulted in a mutant with reduced IgE binding and reduced allergenic activity. Stimulation of PBMCs from Alternaria-sensitized patients with this mutant revealed a retained T-cell reactivity with reduced production of IL-4.152 We recently identified Alt a 1-derived peptides without allergenic activity, but with ability to induce Alt a 1 specific IgGs that could inhibit allergic patients' IgE binding to Alt a 1.72 Based on these results it should be possible to construct non-allergenic fusion proteins consisting of the peptides and a suitable carrier protein for the development of a safe candidate vaccine for SIT of Alternaria allergy which then can be evaluated in clinical studies. In order to advance progress in the field of mold allergy to other allergenic molds, it will be also important to identify the most relevant mold genera and their clinically relevant allergens in population studies so that the prerequisites for vaccine development are available.

Supplementary Table 1A

Allergens of Ascomycota

Species	Allergen	Biological function	MW (kDa)	Prev (%)	N	r	Cross-reactivity to	Acc. no.
Alternaria alternata	Alt a 1153	not known	30	93	43154	+		P79085-1
				47	19154
				97.6	42155
	Alt a 2156	not known	25	61.5	26156	+		O94095-1
				0	42155
	Alt a 3157	heat shock protein 70	85			-		P78983-1
	Alt a 4158	disulfide isomerase	57			-		Q00002-1
	Alt a 5157,158	acid ribosomal protein P2	11			+		P42037-1
	Alt a 675	enolase	46.9	14.3	42155	+	Cla h 675	Q9HDT3-1
				22	2375		Pen c 22159
							Hev b 9160
				37	30110
	Alt a 7158	YCP4 homologue	22			+		P42058
	Alt a 8161	mannitol dehydrogenase	29	40.9	22161	+	Cla h 8161	P0C0Y4
	Alt a 9158	not known	42			-
	Alt a 10158	aldehyde dehydrogenase	53			+		P42041
	Alt a 12158	acid ribosomal protein P1	11			-		P49148
	Alt a 1381,162	glutathione-S-transferase	26	82.4	17162	+		Q6R4B4
	Alt a 14110	Manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase	24			-		P86254
	Alt a 70 kDa163	not known	70			-
	Alt a NTF2164	nuclear transport factor 2	13.7			+	Cla h NTF2164	Q8NKB7
	Alt a TCTP165	translationally controlled tumor protein, histamine releasing factor	18.8	4	225165	+	Cla h TCTP165	D0MQ50
							Hom s TCTP165
Alternaria arborescens	Alt ar 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ96
Alternaria argyranthemi	Alt arg 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB9
Alternaira brassicicola	Alt b 1166,167	Alt a 1 related				-		Q8TG05
Alternaira blumeae	Alt bl 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA8
Alternaria brassicae	Alt br 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ90
Alternaria capsici	Alt c 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA1
Alternaria carotiincultae	Alt ca 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB2
Alternaria cetera	Alt ce 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZC1
Alternaria cheiranthi	Alt ch 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA9
Alternaria cinerariae	Alt ci 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ91
Alternaria conjuncta	Alt co 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB8
Alternaria crassa	Alt cr 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA6
Alternaria cucumerina	Alt cu 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ99
Alternaria dauci	Alt d 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA7
Alternaria dumosa	Alt du 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ94
Alternaria eryngii	Alt e 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ86
Alternaria ethzedia	Alt et 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB5
Alternaria euphorbiicola	Alt eu 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ85
Alternaria japonica	Alt j 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ87
Alternaria limoniasperae	Alt l 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ93
Alternaria longipes	Alt lo 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ95
Alternaria macrospora	Alt m 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA5
Alternaria metachromatica	Alt me 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB4
Alternaria mimicula	Alt mi 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ89
Alternaria mouchaccae	Alt mo 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZC0
Alternaria oregonensis	Alt o 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB6
Alternaria petroselini	Alt p 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB1
Alternaria photistica	Alt ph 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB7
Alternaria porri	Alt po 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA3
Alternaria pseudorostrata	Alt ps 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA4
Alternaria radicina	Alt r 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB3
Alternaria solani	Alt s 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA0
Alternaria smyrnii	Alt sm 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZB0
Alternaria sonchi	Alt so 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ92
Alternaria tagetica	Alt t 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZA2
Alternaria tenuissima	Alt te 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZ97
Aspergillus flavus	Asp fl 13168,169	alkaline serine protease, elastase	34			+	Pen c 1169	Q9UVU3
							Pen ch 13170
	Asp fl 18171	vacuolar serine protease	34			-
Aspergillus fumigatus	Asp f 1172,173	ribonuclease	18	46	35174	+	Asp r 1172	P67875
	Asp f 2175	fibrinogen binding protein	37			+		P79017
	Asp f 3176	peroxisomal membrane protein	18.5	49	35174	+	Candida peroxisomal membrane protein176	O43099
				72	89176
				62.5	8177
	Asp f 4178	not known	30	0	35174	+		O60024
	Asp f 5179,180	metalloproteases	42	74	35174	+		P46075
	Asp f 6181	manganese superoxide dismutase	26.7	0	35174	+	Hom s MnSOD181	Q92450
	Asp f 7174	not known	11.6	29	35174	+		O42799
	Asp f 8182	60S acidic ribosomal protein P2	11	8	75182	+	Hom s P2182	Q9UUZ6
	Asp f 9174	glycosyl hydrolase	34	31	35174	+		Q8J0P4
	Asp f 10183	aspartic protease	34.4	3	35174	+		P41748
	Asp f 1165,80	rotamase, cyclophilin	21	90	3080	+	Hom s CyP B66	Q9Y7F6
							Mala s 680
	Asp f 12184	heat shock protein 90	90			+		P40292
	Asp f 13179,185-187	alkaline serine protease	33			+		P28296
	Asp f 15188	serine protease	16			-		O60022
	Asp f 16189	not known	43			+		Q8J0P4
	Asp f 17	not known				-		O60025
	Asp f 18190	vacuolar serine protease	34			+		P87184
	Asp f 22159	enolase	47			+	Alt a 6159	Q96X30
							Pen c 22159
	Asp f 23191	60S ribosomal protein L3	44			+		Q8NKF4
	Asp f 2766	cyclophilin	17.7			+	Hom s CyP B66	Q4WWX5
	Asp f 2867	thioredoxin	11.9			+	Mala s 1367	Q1RQJ1
	Asp f 2967	thioredoxin	12			+	Mala s 1367	Q4WV97
	Asp f 34192	PhiA cell wall protein	19.3	46	24192	+		A4FSH5
	Asp f 56 kDa193	protease	56			-
	Asp f AfCalAp194	extracellular thaumatin domain protein	18.7			+
	Asp f GST81	glutathione S-transferase	26			-		B0Y813
Aspergillus nidulans	Aspe ni 2195	not known	29			+		Q00746
Aspergillus niger	Asp n 14196	β-xylosidase	105			-		O00089
	Asp n 18197	vacuolar serine protease	34			+		P33295
	Asp n 25198,199	phosphatase	66			-		P34754
	Asp n 30200	catalase	84.2			-		A2QTS7
	Asp n Glucoamylase201	glucoamylase	68.3			-		P69328
	Asp n Hemicellulase202,203	hemicellulase	22.6			+		P55329
	Asp n Pectinase	polygalacturonases	38.1			-		P26213
Aspergillus oryzae	Asp o 13204,205	alkaline serine protease	34			+		P12547
	Asp o 21206	TAKA amylase A	53			-		P0C1B4
	Asp o Lactase207,208	galactosidase	109			-
	Asp o Lipase209	lipase	31			-
Aspergillus restrictus	Asp r 1210,211	ribonuclease	18			-		P67876
Aspergillus versicolor	Asp v 13212	Extracellular alkaline serine proteas	43			+		D5LGB3
	Asp v Catalase A (Asp v 5)213	catalase	105			-
	Asp v Enolase (Asp f 7)213	enolase	58			-
	Asp v GAPDH (Aspf v 1)213	glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate	35			+
		dehydrogenase				-
	Asp v MDH (Asp v 9)213	malate dehydrogenase	33			-
	Asp v SXR (Asp v 4)213	sorbitol/xylulose reductase	27			-
Beauveria bassiana	Bea b Ald214	aldehyde dehydrogenase	53.9			+		Q0PV91
	Bea b Enol214	enolase	47.4			+		Q0PV93
	Bea b f2214	fibrinogen binding protein	28.6			+		Q0PV92
	Bea b Hex214	N-acetylglucosaminidase	72			+		Q0PV90
Candida albicans	Cand a 1215,216	alcohol dehydrogenase	40			-		P43067
	Cand a 3217	peroxisomal membrane protein	29			+		Q6YK78
	Cand a CAAP218	acid protease	44	36.7	49219	-
	Cand a CyP80	rotamase, cyclophilin	18			+
	Cand a Enolase220-223	enolase	46	37	5477	+	Sac c Enolase77	P30575
							Rho m176
	Cand a FPA220	fructose 1,6- bisphosphate aldolase	37			-		Q9URB4
	Cand a PGK220,224	phosphoglycerate kinase	43			-		P46273
Candida boidinii	Cand b 2225	peroxisomal membrane protein	18.6			+	Asp f 3176	P14292
	Cand b FD226	formate dehydrogenase	40.3			-		O93968
Cladosporium cladosporioides	Cla c 9227	vacuolar serine protease	36			+	Asp f 18227	B0L807
							Pen ch 18227
	Cla c 14228	transaldolase	36.5	38	10	+	Pen ch 35228	G8Z407
Cladosporium herbarum	Cla h 1158	not known	30			-
	Cla h 2 [123, 192] 158,229	not known	45			-
	Cla h 5 [123, 193] 158,230	acid ribosomal protein P2	11			+		P42039
	Cla h 6 [123] 158	enolase	46			+	Alt a 675	P42040
							Sac c Enolase75
							Hev b 9160
	Cla h 7158	flavodoxin (YCP4 homologue)	22			+		P42059
	Cla h 8231	mannitol dehydrogenase	28	57.1	21231	+	Alt a 8161	P0C0Y5
	Cla h 9232	vacuolar serine protease	55	15.5	110232	+	Asp f 18232	B7ZK61
							Pen ch 13232
							Pen o 18232
	Cla h 10158	aldehyde dehydrogenase	53			+		P40108
	Cla h 12	acid ribosomal protein P1	11			-		P50344
	Cla h abH223	alpha/beta hydrolase	29.9	17.9	28233	+
	Cla h 8 CSP234	cold shock protein	8			+
	Cla h 42 kDa158	not known	42			-
	Cla h GST81	glutathione S-transferase	26			-
	Cla h HCh1235	hydrophobin-1	10.5			+		Q8NIN9
	Cla h HSP70236	heat shock protein	70			+		P40918
	Cla h NTF2164	nuclear transport factor 2	14.2			+	Alt a NTF2164	Q8NJ52
	Cla h TCTP237	translationally controlled tumor protein, histamine releasing factor	18.7	3	306237	+	Alt a TCTP165	A1KXP4
							Hom s TCTP165,237
Cryphonectria parasitica	Cry p Aspartic Protease238	aspartic protease	43.2			-		P11838
Curvularia lunata	Cur l 1239	serine protease	31	80	15239	-
	Cur l 2240	enolase	48	100	15240	+		Q96VP4
	Cur l 3241	cytochrome C	12	66.7-100	15241	+	Proteins of	Q96VP3
							Alternaria alternata241
							Cladosporium herbarum241
							Fusarium solani241
							Epicoccum purpurascens241
							Aspergillus fumigatus241
							Rhizopus oryzae241
							Mucor hiemalis241
							Penicillium citrinum241
							Candida albicans241
							Lolium perenne241
							Phleum pratense241
							Poa pratensis241
							Imperata cylindrica241
							Zea mays241
							Pennisetum tyhpoides241
							Cenchrus ciliaris241
	Cur l 4242	vacuolar serine protease	54	81	16242	+		B3V0K8
	Cur l ADH	alcohol dehydrogenase	37.6			-		A1YDT6
	Cur l GST81	glutathione-S-transferase	26.9			-		Q45X98
	Cur l MnSOD	Mn superoxide dismutase	21.4			-		Q1EHH3
	Cur l Oryzin	oryzin, Asp f 13-like protein	14.2			-		Q1EHH2
	Cur l Trx	thioredoxin, Cop c 2-like protein	12.3			-		Q1EHH0
	Cur l ZPS1	Asp f 2-like protein	17.3			-		Q1EHH4
Embellisia allii	Emb a 1166	Alt a 1 related				-	AY563322
Embellisia indefessa	Emb i 1166	Alt a 1 related				-	AY563323
Embellisia novae-zelandiae	Emb nz 1166	Alt a 1 related				-	AY563324
Embellisia telluster	Emb t 1166	Alt a 1 related				-	AY563325
Epicoccum purpurascens	Epi p 1243,244	serine protease	33.5			-		P83340
(Epicoccum nigrum)	Epi p GST81	glutathione-S-transferase	26			-		Q45X97
Fusarium culmorum	Fus c 1245	60S acid ribosomal protein P2	11	35	26245	+		Q8TFM9
	Fus c 2245	thioredoxin-like protein	13	50	26245	+		Q8TFM8
	Fus c 3245	not known	49	15	26245	+		Q8J1X7
Fusarium proliferatum	Fus p 483	transaldolase	37.5	47	17245	+
Fusarium solani	Fus s 1246	not known	65			-		P81010
	Fus s 45 kDa247	not known	45			-	proteins from
							Alternaria alternata247
							Cladosporium herbarum247
							Curvularia lunata247
							Epicoccum nigrum247
Neosartorya fischeri	Neo fi 1	ribonuclease	19.6			-		A1D080
Nimbya caricis	Nim c 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563321
Nimbya scirpicola	Nim s 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563320
Penicillium brevicompactum	Pen b 13248	alkaline serine protease	33			-
	Pen b 26249,250	60S acid ribosomal protein P1	11	73	41250	+		Q49KL9
Penicillium chrysogenum	Pen ch 13170,251,252	alkaline serine protease	34			+	Asp fl 13170	Q9URR2
							Pen c 13170
							Pen c 1251
	Pen ch 18252,253	vacuolar serine protease	32	76.9	13254	+	Cla c 9227	Q9P8G3
							Pen c 18253
							Rho m 2255
	Pen ch 20256	N-acetyl glucosaminidase	68			+		Q02352
	Pen ch 31	calreticulin	61.6			-		Q2TL59
	Pen ch 33	not known	16			-
	Pen ch 3583	transaldolase	36.5			+	Cla c 1483	G8Z408
Penicillium citrinum	Pen c 1257	alkaline serine protease	33			+	Pen ch 13251	Q9Y749
	Pen c 2258	alkaline vacuolar serine protease	43			+		Q9Y755
	Pen c 3259	peroxisomal membrane protein	18	46.4	28259	+	Asp f 3259	Q9Y8B8
	Pen c 13170,205	alkaline serine protease	33			+	Cla h 91
							Pen ch 13170
	Pen c 18260	vacuolar serine protease	37.4			+	Pen ch 18253	Q9HF11
							Pen o 18260
	Pen c 19261	heat shock protein 70	70			+		Q92260
	Pen c 22159	enolase	47	30	23159	+	Asp f 22159	Q96X46
	Pen c 241	elongation factor 1 beta	25			+		Q69BZ7
	Pen c 30263	catalase	97			-		Q2V6Q5
	Pen c 32263	pectate lyase	40			-		A2I7W3
	Pen c MnSOD	Mn superoxide dismutase	23.1			-		A1YDT8
Penicillium crustosum	Pen cr 26264	60S acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P1	11	23		+		H2E5X2
Penicillium oxalicum	Pen o 18260	vacuolar serine protease	34			+	Pen o 18260	Q9HF12
Phoma tracheiphila	Pho t 1	not known				-
Pleospora herbarum	Ple h 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		Q5EZC2
Saccharomyces cervisiae	Sac c alpha Glucosidae	glucosidase	68.1			-		P38158
	Sac c Carboxypeptidase Y	serine carboxypeptidase				-		P00729
	Sac c Cyp80	rotamase, cyclophilin	18			+
	Sac c Enolase265	enolase	46.7			-	Cand a enolase77,266	P00924
	Sac c Invertase	fructofuranosidase	60.6			-
	Sac c MnSOD267	manganese superoxide dismutase	25			+	Asp f 678	P00447
							Hom s MnSOD78
Stachybotrys chartarum	Sta c 3 Shi268,269	Mg-dependent exodesoxyribonuclease	21	83	6268	+		GQ258854
	Sta c Cellulase270	glycosyl hydrolase, cellulase	48			-
	Sta c Hemolysin271	hemolysin	30	38	21271	-
	Sta c Stachyrase A271,272	chymotrypsin-like serine protease	32	81	21271	-
	SchS3468		34		468	+		GQ258855
Stemphylium botroyosum	Ste b 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563274
Stemphylium callistephi	Ste c 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563276
Stemphylium vesicarium	Ste v 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563275
Thermomyces lanuginosus	The l Lipase273	lipase				-		O59952
Thermomyces mentagrophytes	Tri me 2	serine protease				-		Q8J1L9
	Tri me 4	dipeptidyl peptidase	80			-		Q8J1M3
Trichophyton rubrum	Tri r 2274,275	subtilisin-like serine protease	29	43	73275	+		Q9UW97
	Tri r 4274,275	serine protease	83			+		Q9UW98
Trichophyton schoenleinii	Tri sc 2	dipeptidyl-peptidase	80			-		Q8J077
	Tri sc 4					-		Q8J1L4
Trichophyton tonsurans	Tri t 1276	not known	30	54	48276	-
				73	30276
	Tri t 4277	serine protease	83	56.5	23277	-		P80514
Ulocladium alternariae	Ulo a 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563316
Ulocladium atrum	Ulo at 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563318
Ulocladium botrytis	Ulo b 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563317
Ulocladium chartarum	Ulo c 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563319
Ulocladium cucurbitae	Ulo cu 1166	Alt a 1 related				-		AY563315

Supplementary Table 1B

Allergens of Basidiomycota

Species	Allergen	Biological function	MW (kDa)	Prev (%)	N	r	Cross-reactivity to	Acc. no.
Coprinus comatus	Cop c 1278	leucin zipper protein	11	25	92	+		Q9Y7G3
	Cop c 2	thioredoxin	11.8			-		Q9UW02
	Cop c 3	not known				-		Q9UW01
	Cop c 4	not known				-
	Cop c 5	not known	15.6			-		Q9UW00
	Cop c 6	not known				-
	Cop c 7	not known				-		Q9UVZ9
Malassezia furfur	Mala f 2279	peroxisomal membrane protein	21	71.9	64279	+		P56577
	Mala f 3279	peroxisomal membrane protein	20	70.3	64279	+		P56578
	Mala f 4280	mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase	35	83.3	36280	+		Q9Y750
Malassezia sympodialis	Mala s 1281	cell wall protein	36	43-61	95282	+		Q01940
				17.5	40283
	Mala s 5284	peroxisomal membrane protein	18.2	48	25284	+		O93969
				35	40283
	Mala s 6284	rotamase, cyclophilin	17.2	48	25284	+	Asp f 1180	O93970
				40	40283		Hom s CyP B66
				92	4880
	Mala s 7285	not known	16.2	40-60	25285	+		O93971
	Mala s 8285	not known	19.2	10-18	25285	+		O93972
	Mala s 9285	not known	14	24-36	25285	+		O93973
	Mala s 10286	heat shock protein	86	69	28286	+		Q8TGH3
	Mala s 11286	manganese superoxide dismutase	23	75	28286	+	Hom s MnSOD287	Q873M4
	Mala s 12288	glucose-methanol-choline oxidorecutase	67	62	21288	+		Q5GMY3
	Mala s 1367	thioredoxin	11.5			+	Asp f 2867	Q1RQI9
							Asp f 2967
							Hom s Trx67
Psilocybe cubensis	Psi c 1	not known				-
	Psi c 279,289	rotamase	16			+
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa	Rho m 176	enolase	47	21.4	1476	+	Cand a Enolase76	Q870B9
							Pen c 2276
	Rho m 2255	vacuolar serine protease	31			+	Pen ch 18255	Q32ZM1
							Pen o 18255
Schizophyllum commune	Sch c 1290	glucoamylase	61			+	Asp n Glucoamylase290	D8Q9M3

Supplementary Table 1C

Allergens of Zygomycota

Species	Allergen	Biological function	MW (kDa)	Prev (%)	N	r	Cross-reactivity to	Acc. no.
Rhizomucor miehei	Rhi m Aspartic Protease	aspartic protease	46.2			-		P00799

Fungal species producing allergenic molecules are listed according to their classification to the phyla Ascomycota (A), Basidomycota (B) or Zygomycota (C). Allergen designations, biological functions, molecular weights (in kDa), prevalences (in %), cross-reactivities, accession numbers (Acc. no.) are displayed. N, number of patients analyzed; r, available as recombinant protein.