Literature DB >> 25840699

Using Flow-Ecology Relationships to Evaluate Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Complementarities in the Nation's Largest River Swamp.

Justin P Kozak1, Micah G Bennett, Anne Hayden-Lesmeister, Kelley A Fritz, Aaron Nickolotsky.   

Abstract

Large river systems are inextricably linked with social systems; consequently, management decisions must be made within a given ecological, social, and political framework that often defies objective, technical resolution. Understanding flow-ecology relationships in rivers is necessary to assess potential impacts of management decisions, but translating complex flow-ecology relationships into stakeholder-relevant information remains a struggle. The concept of ecosystem services provides a bridge between flow-ecology relationships and stakeholder-relevant data. Flow-ecology relationships were used to explore complementary and trade-off relationships among 12 ecosystem services and related variables in the Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana. Results from Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration were reduced to four management-relevant hydrologic variables using principal components analysis. Multiple regression was used to determine flow-ecology relationships and Pearson correlation coefficients, along with regression results, were used to determine complementary and trade-off relationships among ecosystem services and related variables that were induced by flow. Seven ecosystem service variables had significant flow-ecology relationships for at least one hydrologic variable (R (2) = 0.19-0.64). River transportation and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) landings exhibited a complementary relationship mediated by flow; whereas transportation and crawfish landings, crawfish landings and crappie (Pomoxis spp.) abundance, and blue crab landings and blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) abundance exhibited trade-off relationships. Other trade-off and complementary relationships among ecosystem services and related variables, however, were not related to flow. These results give insight into potential conflicts among stakeholders, can reduce the dimensions of management decisions, and provide initial hypotheses for experimental flow modifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25840699     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0474-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations.

Authors:  Carl Folke; Steve Carpenter; Thomas Elmqvist; Lance Gunderson; C S Holling; Brian Walker
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart E Bunn; Angela H Arthington
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The problem of overfitting.

Authors:  Douglas M Hawkins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

4.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.

Authors:  Angela H Arthington; Stuart E Bunn; N LeRoy Poff; Robert J Naiman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.

Authors:  Fikret Berkes
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 6.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.

Authors:  Elena M Bennett; Garry D Peterson; Line J Gordon
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.492

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Connecting Recreational Service to Visitor's Well-Being: A Case Study in Qianjiangyuan National Park.

Authors:  Wenjia Zhou; Jun Cai; Kai Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.