Literature DB >> 25840659

Determination of high-intensity sweeteners in river water and wastewater by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Paula Arbeláez1, Francesc Borrull1, Eva Pocurull2, Rosa Maria Marcé1.   

Abstract

High-intensity sweeteners have been suggested as potential organic contaminants due to their widespread use in food, drugs and sanitary products. As a consequence, they are introduced into the environment by different pathways, affecting aquatic life. In this study, a method based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) has been developed and validated for the determination of eight sweeteners (saccharin, cyclamate, aspartame, acesulfame, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, sucralose, stevioside and glycyrrhizic acid) in river water and wastewater. To get the maximum recoveries in SPE, several commercial sorbents were tested and Oasis HLB gave the best results, with recoveries higher than 41% for all of the compounds in the different matrices. Method limits of detection were in the range of 0.001-0.04μg/L in river water and 0.01-0.5μg/L in influent and effluent wastewater. Method reproducibility between days (n=5) was below 15% for all compounds. The method was applied to the determination of sweeteners in various river waters and wastewaters in Catalonia. Cyclamate, aspartame, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, acesulfame and sucralose were found in river water, with the two last compounds being present at the highest values (1.62μg/L for acesulfame and 3.57μg/L for sucralose). In influent and effluent wastewater, all of the compounds were found at concentration levels ranging from 0.05 to 155μg/L except for stevioside and neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, which were not detected.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amide polar-embedded reversed-phase column; Liquid chromatography; River water and wastewater; Solid phase extraction; Sweeteners; Tandem mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25840659     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  5 in total

1.  Impact of Hurricane Maria on Drinking Water Quality in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Yishan Lin; Maria Sevillano-Rivera; Tao Jiang; Guangyu Li; Irmarie Cotto; Solize Vosloo; Corey M G Carpenter; Philip Larese-Casanova; Roger W Giese; Damian E Helbling; Ingrid Y Padilla; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen Vélez Vega; José F Cordero; Akram N Alshawabkeh; Ameet Pinto; April Z Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Understanding the metabolic and health effects of low-calorie sweeteners: methodological considerations and implications for future research.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Jenny E Blau; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Biodegradation of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in biological wastewater treatment and sandfilters.

Authors:  Sandro Castronovo; Arne Wick; Marco Scheurer; Karsten Nödler; Manoj Schulz; Thomas A Ternes
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Dynamic monitoring of plasma amino acids and carnitine during chemotherapy of patients with alimentary canal malignancies and its clinical value.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Jiaqi Wang; Zhenghua Wang; Qingjun Wang; Hua Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Analytical Methods for Determination of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in Foodstuffs.

Authors:  Viki Oktavirina; Nadhila B Prabawati; Rohmah Nur Fathimah; Miguel Palma; Kiki Adi Kurnia; Noviyan Darmawan; Brian Yulianto; Widiastuti Setyaningsih
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.