Fan Zhu1, Lihong Shi2, James Douglas Engel3, Yuanfang Guan4. 1. Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 2. State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China. 3. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology. 4. Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Modeling regulatory networks using expression data observed in a differentiation process may help identify context-specific interactions. The outcome of the current algorithms highly depends on the quality and quantity of a single time-course dataset, and the performance may be compromised for datasets with a limited number of samples. RESULTS: In this work, we report a multi-layer graphical model that is capable of leveraging many publicly available time-course datasets, as well as a cell lineage-specific data with small sample size, to model regulatory networks specific to a differentiation process. First, a collection of network inference methods are used to predict the regulatory relationships in individual public datasets. Then, the inferred directional relationships are weighted and integrated together by evaluating against the cell lineage-specific dataset. To test the accuracy of this algorithm, we collected a time-course RNA-Seq dataset during human erythropoiesis to infer regulatory relationships specific to this differentiation process. The resulting erythroid-specific regulatory network reveals novel regulatory relationships activated in erythropoiesis, which were further validated by genome-wide TR4 binding studies using ChIP-seq. These erythropoiesis-specific regulatory relationships were not identifiable by single dataset-based methods or context-independent integrations. Analysis of the predicted targets reveals that they are all closely associated with hematopoietic lineage differentiation.
MOTIVATION: Modeling regulatory networks using expression data observed in a differentiation process may help identify context-specific interactions. The outcome of the current algorithms highly depends on the quality and quantity of a single time-course dataset, and the performance may be compromised for datasets with a limited number of samples. RESULTS: In this work, we report a multi-layer graphical model that is capable of leveraging many publicly available time-course datasets, as well as a cell lineage-specific data with small sample size, to model regulatory networks specific to a differentiation process. First, a collection of network inference methods are used to predict the regulatory relationships in individual public datasets. Then, the inferred directional relationships are weighted and integrated together by evaluating against the cell lineage-specific dataset. To test the accuracy of this algorithm, we collected a time-course RNA-Seq dataset during human erythropoiesis to infer regulatory relationships specific to this differentiation process. The resulting erythroid-specific regulatory network reveals novel regulatory relationships activated in erythropoiesis, which were further validated by genome-wide TR4 binding studies using ChIP-seq. These erythropoiesis-specific regulatory relationships were not identifiable by single dataset-based methods or context-independent integrations. Analysis of the predicted targets reveals that they are all closely associated with hematopoietic lineage differentiation.
Authors: Roger Pique-Regi; Jacob F Degner; Athma A Pai; Daniel J Gaffney; Yoav Gilad; Jonathan K Pritchard Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Osamu Tanabe; Yannan Shen; Qinghui Liu; Andrew D Campbell; Takashi Kuroha; Masayuki Yamamoto; James Douglas Engel Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Jason Ernst; Qasim K Beg; Krin A Kay; Gábor Balázsi; Zoltán N Oltvai; Ziv Bar-Joseph Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Fan Zhu; Bharat Panwar; Hiroko H Dodge; Hongdong Li; Benjamin M Hampstead; Roger L Albin; Henry L Paulson; Yuanfang Guan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yasser Abduallah; Turki Turki; Kevin Byron; Zongxuan Du; Miguel Cervantes-Cervantes; Jason T L Wang Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-01-22 Impact factor: 3.411