Literature DB >> 25839978

Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Luis Lassaletta1, Miryam Calvino, Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado, Rosa M Pérez-Mora, Elena Muñoz, Javier Gavilán.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the audiological, surgical, quality of life, and quality of sound outcomes in adults with open cavities implanted with the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) implant using round window (RW) vibroplasty approach. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Otolaryngology department, tertiary referral hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve adult patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss, all with previous middle ear surgery, underwent RW vibroplasty in an open cavity. Compound action potential thresholds were assessed during surgery. Surgical complications were recorded. Subjective benefit was evaluated using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI29) tests.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 42 months (range 12-76). There was no significant change in bone conduction thresholds after surgery. Mean functional gain was 34.3 dB and speech discrimination score at 65 dB significantly improved from 14 to 83%. Extrusion of the wire link was the main surgical complication in four patients. All NCIQ domains improved after surgery. All patients had a positive overall GBI score (mean 35.0). Mean HISQUI29 score was 152.8, on average the quality of sound being defined as "very good."
CONCLUSION: VSB is an effective method of hearing restoration for adults with open cavities suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss. Intraoperative electrocochleography may be considered of significant help to check the coupling to the inner ear. The high rate of extrusion suggests that middle ear obliteration may be considered in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839978     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  6 in total

1.  Complications after round window vibroplasty.

Authors:  Maurizio Barbara; Luigi Volpini; Edoardo Covelli; Martina Romeo; Chiara Filippi; Simonetta Monini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  The Hannover Coupler V2: Audiological outcomes of a round window coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge.

Authors:  Nicole Knölke; Dawid Murawski; Nina Wardenga; Susan Busch; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-28

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Middle Ear and Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Stephen E M Jones; Rujuta Roplekar-Bance; Richard Green; Caroline Rae; Aaron Ferguson; Patrick M Spielmann
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Vibrant Soundbridge Users Requiring Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Faris F Brkic; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dominik Riss; Thomas Thurner; David T Liu; Wolfgang Gstöttner; Erich Vyskocil
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Active Middle Ear Implant in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Multiple Calvarial Defects: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kei Kajihara; Akira Ganaha; Keiji Matsuda; Takeshi Nakamura; Tetsuya Tono
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.