Literature DB >> 25839372

[Subgroups in the early benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals: a methodical review].

Andrej Rasch1, Charalabos-Markos Dintsios2.   

Abstract

Benefit assessments according to Sect. 35a of the Social Code Book V are frequently divided into subsets of populations. This division of therapeutic indications is evident in almost every other of the completed appraisals by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). The subsets can be deduced from the wording of the approved therapeutic indication (subpopulations) or from potential effect modification (subgroups). Methodological challenges are illustrated on the basis of current scientific knowledge of how to tackle subgroups. Practical assessment examples are used to explain the methods implemented by IQWiG and the G-BA and reveal major problem areas concerning subgroup analyses, subpopulations as well as mismatches between the requirements of early benefit assessment and approval. Overall, it appears there is a need for establishing a more comprehensive discussion regarding the validity of subgroup analyses and their associated limitations.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Keywords:  AMNOG; Benefit assessment; G-BA; IQWiG; Nutzenbewertung; Subgruppen; Subpopulationen; subgroups; subpopulations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839372     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  3 in total

1.  Methodological problems in the method used by IQWiG within early benefit assessment of new pharmaceuticals in Germany.

Authors:  Matthias Herpers; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-25

2.  Determinants of Orphan Drug Prices in Germany.

Authors:  Franziska Worm; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Different interpretation of additional evidence for HTA by the commissioned HTA body and the commissioning decision maker in Germany: whenever IQWiG and Federal Joint Committee disagree.

Authors:  C M Dintsios; F Worm; J Ruof; M Herpers
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2019-12-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.