Literature DB >> 25839202

Use of behavior change techniques in clean cooking interventions: a review of the evidence and scorecard of effectiveness.

Nicholas J Goodwin1, Sarah Ellen O'Farrell, Kirstie Jagoe, Jonathan Rouse, Elisa Roma, Adam Biran, Eric A Finkelstein.   

Abstract

Despite decades of effort, around 2.8 billion people still rely on solid fuels to meet domestic energy needs. There is robust evidence this causes premature death and chronic disease, as well as wider economic, social, and environmental problems. Behavior change interventions are effective to reduce exposure to harm such as household air pollution, including those using health communications approaches. This article reports the findings of a project that reviewed the effectiveness of behavior change approaches in cleaner cooking interventions in resource-poor settings. The authors synthesized evidence of the use of behavior change techniques, along the cleaner cooking value chain, to bring positive health, economic, and environmental impacts. Forty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, which documented 55 interventions carried out in 20 countries. The groupings of behavior change techniques most frequently used were shaping knowledge (n = 47), rewards and threats (n = 35), social support (n = 35), and comparisons (n = 16). A scorecard of behavior change effectiveness was developed to analyze a selection of case study interventions. Behavior change techniques have been used effectively as part of multilevel programs. Cooking demonstrations, the right product, and understanding of the barriers and benefits along the value chain have all played a role. Often absent are theories and models of behavior change adapted to the target audience and local context. Robust research methods are needed to track and evaluate behavior change and impact, not just technology disseminated. Behavior change approaches could then play a more prominent role as the "special sauce" in cleaner cooking interventions in resource poor settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839202     DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2014.1002958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  7 in total

1.  Determinants of Cookstoves and Fuel Choice Among Rural Households in India.

Authors:  Vikas Menghwani; Hisham Zerriffi; Puneet Dwivedi; Julian D Marshall; Andrew Grieshop; Rob Bailis
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Adoption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stoves in Guatemala: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Lisa M Thompson; Mayari Hengstermann; John R Weinstein; Anaite Diaz-Artiga
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Designing a behavioral intervention using the COM-B model and the theoretical domains framework to promote gas stove use in rural Guatemala: a formative research study.

Authors:  Lisa M Thompson; Anaité Diaz-Artiga; John R Weinstein; Margaret A Handley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Firewood, smoke and respiratory diseases in developing countries-The neglected role of outdoor cooking.

Authors:  Jörg Langbein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The benefits of action to reduce household air pollution (BAR-HAP) model: A new decision support tool.

Authors:  Ipsita Das; Jessica J Lewis; Ramona Ludolph; Melanie Bertram; Heather Adair-Rohani; Marc Jeuland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An evaluation of the Fondo de Inclusión Social Energético program to promote access to liquefied petroleum gas in Peru.

Authors:  Suzanne L Pollard; Kendra N Williams; Carolyn J O'Brien; Abigail Winiker; Elisa Puzzolo; Josiah L Kephart; Magdalena Fandiño-Del-Rio; Carla Tarazona-Meza; Matthew Grigsby; Marilú Chiang; William Checkley
Journal:  Energy Sustain Dev       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Designing a comprehensive behaviour change intervention to promote and monitor exclusive use of liquefied petroleum gas stoves for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial.

Authors:  Kendra N Williams; Lisa M Thompson; Zoe Sakas; Mayari Hengstermann; Ashlinn Quinn; Anaité Díaz-Artiga; Gurusamy Thangavel; Elisa Puzzolo; Ghislaine Rosa; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Jennifer Peel; William Checkley; Thomas F Clasen; J Jaime Miranda; Joshua P Rosenthal; Steven A Harvey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.