Literature DB >> 25839059

Use of atropine-diphenoxylate compared with hyoscyamine to decrease rates of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome.

Connie Cheng1, Jessica E Lau2, Marc A Earl2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cholinergic syndrome is a well established acute adverse reaction associated with irinotecan. Cholinergic side effects can be ameliorated or prevented with anticholinergic agents. To date, no formal studies have compared atropine-diphenoxylate and hyoscyamine as premedications for prophylaxis of the cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan infusion.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of cholinergic syndrome with irinotecan using atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, nonrandomized, cohort study of adult patients treated with atropine-diphenoxylate or hyoscyamine as premedication before receiving irinotecan. For all irinotecan infusions, intravenous atropine was administered for patients experiencing any cholinergic reaction.
RESULTS: A total of 532 irinotecan cycles (354 cycles for atropine-diphenoxylate group; 178 cycles for hyoscyamine group) were analyzed in 80 patients. Overall incidence of cholinergic syndrome did not differ between atropine-diphenoxylate (8.2%) and hyoscyamine (9.0%) groups (P = .76). The incidence of cholinergic syndrome after the £rst cycle of irinotecan was similar between the 2 arms, atropine-diphenoxylate (14.6%) and hyoscyamine (10.7%), with P = .74. The most common cholinergic symptoms documented were abdominal pain or cramping, and diarrhea. LIMITATIONS: This study was subjected to vulnerabilities to bias and random error because of its observational retrospective design and small number of participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of difference in the incidence of cholinergic syndrome observed in irinotecan-treated patients suggests atropinediphenoxylate and hyoscyamine may both be effective prophylactic options. The findings support the need for a larger, randomized study to assess and compare these agents with other potential premedications such as scopolamine and atropine in prevention of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome. ©2015 Frontline Medical Communications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cholinergic; hyoscyamine; irinotecan; lomotil; premedication

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839059     DOI: 10.12788/jcso.0099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Support Oncol        ISSN: 2330-7749


  4 in total

1.  Predictive factors for the development of irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome using ordered logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  Yuko Kanbayashi; Takeshi Ishikawa; Motohiro Kanazawa; Yuki Nakajima; Yusuke Tabuchi; Rumi Kawano; Tomoko Yoshioka; Naohisa Yoshida; Toyoshi Hosokawa; Koichi Takayama; Tetsuya Taguchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Muscarinic Receptors Associated with Cancer.

Authors:  Gloria M Calaf; Leodan A Crispin; Juan P Muñoz; Francisco Aguayo; Tammy C Bleak
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Femke M de Man; Andrew K L Goey; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Prophylactic effect of scopolamine butylbromide, a competitive antagonist of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, on irinotecan-related cholinergic syndrome.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Iihara; Hironori Fujii; Chiaki Yoshimi; Ryo Kobayashi; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Akio Suzuki
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.333

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.