Vinay Mahishale1, Arati Mahishale2, Bhagyashri Patil1, Avuthu Sindhuri1, Ajith Eti1. 1. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Karnataka Lingayat Education University's, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, India. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Physiotherapy, Karnataka Lingayat Education University's, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common and under diagnosed medical conditions in India. Prevalence of these chronic diseases are high both in rural and urban areas. However, exact prevalence of DM in Indian COPD patients in unclear. Co-morbid conditions like DM have great impact on the outcome of COPD in the form of severity, exacerbations, morbidity and mortality. Hence the present study objective was to screen COPD patients for DM. RESULTS: A total of 1662 patients with COPD (Males = 1264, Female = 398) with mean age 58 ± 9.6 were screened for DM. Patients with known history of DM were 353 (21.24%) and were enrolled as Known DM cases. Remaining 1309 (78.76%) patients whose DM status was unclear were screened by random blood sugar (RBS). One-hundred and seventy-one subjects had RBS > 110 mg/dl. About 73 (4.39%) subjects had fasting blood sugar (FBS) > 126 mg/dl. They were considered as Newly Diagnosed DM cases. Total number of DM cases in the study including new and known was 426 (25.63%). Number of patients with deranged FBS (FBS between 110 mg/dl to126 mg/dl) was 84 (5.05%). Among the DM patients with COPD 168 (10.11%) had poor glycemic control with HbA1c > 8. Prevalence of DM in present study was 25.63%. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of DM in COPD patients in the present study is 25.63% when actively screened in tertiary care hospital. It is feasible and imperative to screen all COPD patients for DM in all health care facilities routinely.
BACKGROUND:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common and under diagnosed medical conditions in India. Prevalence of these chronic diseases are high both in rural and urban areas. However, exact prevalence of DM in Indian COPDpatients in unclear. Co-morbid conditions like DM have great impact on the outcome of COPD in the form of severity, exacerbations, morbidity and mortality. Hence the present study objective was to screen COPDpatients for DM. RESULTS: A total of 1662 patients with COPD (Males = 1264, Female = 398) with mean age 58 ± 9.6 were screened for DM. Patients with known history of DM were 353 (21.24%) and were enrolled as Known DM cases. Remaining 1309 (78.76%) patients whose DM status was unclear were screened by random blood sugar (RBS). One-hundred and seventy-one subjects had RBS > 110 mg/dl. About 73 (4.39%) subjects had fasting blood sugar (FBS) > 126 mg/dl. They were considered as Newly Diagnosed DM cases. Total number of DM cases in the study including new and known was 426 (25.63%). Number of patients with deranged FBS (FBS between 110 mg/dl to126 mg/dl) was 84 (5.05%). Among the DMpatients with COPD 168 (10.11%) had poor glycemic control with HbA1c > 8. Prevalence of DM in present study was 25.63%. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of DM in COPDpatients in the present study is 25.63% when actively screened in tertiary care hospital. It is feasible and imperative to screen all COPDpatients for DM in all health care facilities routinely.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common and under diagnosed medical conditions in India. COPD is a progressive, partially reversible airflow obstructive condition and is a growing public health problem globally. In its advanced stage, the disease causes severe disabilities and poor quality of life.1234 It was predicted that COPD will be the third leading cause of death worldwide by 2020 with Asian countries having three times the number of patients than the rest of the world.567 If the mortality from co-morbid conditions like DM associated with COPD is taken into account, then this disease poses an even greater impact on health outcomes.COPD may be considered as a novel risk factor for new onset type 2 DM (T2DM) via multiple pathophysiological alterations such as inflammation, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, weight gain and alterations in metabolism of adipokines.8 The risk appears to exist regardless of the severity of COPD. T2DM is particularly common medical disorder and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Disturbances in glucose metabolism are more frequent in COPDpatients than in non COPD individuals. Similarly, almost half of all COPDpatients suffer from other medical problems frequently linked to diabetes, such as elevated blood pressure and higher levels of cholesterol. The combination of these medical problems is sometimes referred to as "metabolic syndrome" and is considered a cause for various cardiovascular complications in COPDpatients.9 Similarly, many studies have found that DM causes an accelerated decline in lung functions as compared to non-diabetics. Additionally, uncontrolled diabetes is linked to worsen the outcomes (longer hospital stay and risk of death) in people that suffer from an exacerbation of COPD.8The prevalence of COPD in India according to various studies is 3.67% (4.46% among males and 2.86% in females). The estimated burden of COPD in India is about 15 million cases (males and females contributing to 9.02 and 5.75 million, respectively). These figures may however underestimate the true burden since questionnaire based prevalence rates tend to underestimate the true spirometry-based prevalence of COPD.10 There is also an accelerated epidemic of DM in India in last 50-60 years with national adult prevalence of 8.3%.11 In terms of absolute numbers and given the size of population, India is the country, burdened with highest number of COPD and DM cases. However, exact prevalence of DM in COPDpatients in Indian population is unclear. Hence the present study objective was to screen COPDpatients for DM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a cross sectional study of patients diagnosed with COPD as per Global Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) criteria 2013, carried out at the Inpatient and outpatient departments of Pulmonary medicine, Internal Medicine and Endocrinology sections at a tertiary care hospital, Belgaum, Karnataka, India, from Jan 2013 to April 2014.A total of 1662 COPDpatients, aged less than 40 years, attending inpatient and outpatient departments of Pulmonary Medicine, Internal Medicine and Endocrinology sections at a tertiary care hospital were enrolled for the study after meeting the inclusion criteria. Patient were excluded from the study if they had pulmonary conditions other than COPD (e.g. TB, HIV infection), connective tissue disorders, chronic renal failure, chronic liver disease, malignancies on long term steroid or cytotoxic drug therapy, chronic alcoholics. The information of the same was obtained from detailed history, clinical examination, chest radiography and medications used by the patient currently or previously. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants for investigations needed and purpose of the study.Baseline data was recorded which included level of education, age, sex, years of exposure to cigarette/bidi smoking and biomass fuel, BMI and respiratory symptoms including previous spirometry reports. All subjects underwent spirometry testing for airflow limitation and were classified as mild, moderate, severe and very severe accordingly as per GOLD guidelines.1 The screening and diagnosis of DM followed national guidelines, which stipulated that a fasting blood glucose (FBG) is used with cut-off thresholds in line with those recommended by WHO. In brief, FBG >126 mg/dl indicates DM; FBG from 110 mg/dl to <126 mg/dl indicates impaired fasting glucose; FBG <110 mg/dl is normal.12 The patients already known to have DM were directly enrolled in the study as "Known DM" cases with COPD. Patients whose diabetes status was unclear underwent random blood sugar (RBS) testing, and if was more than 126 mg/dl, the subjects were further evaluated with fasting blood sugar (FBS) and post prandial blood sugar (PPBS). If FBS was more than 126 mg/dl or PPBS more than 200 mg/dl the subjects were confirmed as having DM after which they were classified as new DM cases with COPD. All the participants underwent glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) evaluation.
RESULTS
A total of 1662 patients with COPD (Males = 1264, Female = 398) with mean age 58 ± 9.6 were screened for DM. Total number of smokers in the study were 978 and patients with history of exposure to biomass fuel were 398. Patients with known history of DM were 353 (21.24%) and were enrolled as "Known DM" cases. Remaining 1309 (78.76%) patients whose DM status was unclear were screened by RBS. Subjects with RBS > 110 mg/dl were 171. They were further evaluated for FBS. About 73 (4.39%) subjects had FBS >126 mg/dl. They were considered as "Newly Diagnosed DM" cases. Total number of DM cases in the study including new and known was 426 (25.63%). Number of patients with deranged FBS (FBS between 110-126 mg/dl) was 84 (5.05%). Among the DMpatients with COPD 168 (10.11%) had poor glycaemic control with HbA1c >8 [Table 1].
Table 1
Parameters and percentage values
Parameters and percentage values
DISCUSSION
All studies conducted agree in predicting that both the morbidity and mortality burden of COPD is rising. By 2020, COPD is projected to cause over 6 million deaths annually worldwide, thus becoming the third leading cause of death in the world.1 The general ageing of the world's population is reinforcing this trend, partly due to the fact that the prevalence is higher in age-groups. Our general understanding of the disease has greatly improved over the past 10 years. Epidemiological studies and large clinical trials have helped us to understand the importance of comorbidities.1314 Greater understanding of the pathophysiology of COPD, focused on the concept of systemic inflammation, has also helped to explain the high frequency of major co morbidities (cardiovascular, skeletal and metabolic conditions like DM) in addition to coexisting conditions that one would naturally expect due to the patients’ advanced age and due to shared risk factors.The present study is first of its kind, in which COPDpatients are actively screened for DM in a tertiary care hospital in India. The prevalence of DM in our study was 25.63% which is in line with various studies reported from other countries. The prevalence of DM in COPDpatients varies between different studies. 10.3% in a population of grade 2/3 COPDpatients in a rehabilitation centre according to Crisafulli et al.,14 12.6-14.5% in an all-stage COPD population according to Mannino et al.,15 12.2% with an increased risk in active smokers according to Feary et al.16 However the high prevalence of DM in the current study could be due to the fact that most of the patients age was more than 50 years with history of smoking or exposure to biomass fuel for more than 10 years. Average duration of smoking in the study population was 19 ± 8.2. Most of these were bidi smokers containing raw unfiltered tobacco.Systemic inflammation [with elevated markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)] plays an important role in both, the progression of COPD and the development of insulin resistance. Smoking is one cause of inflammation.1617 Smokers have a two-fold higher risk of developing DM than nonsmokers. A recent review of the literature established the complex link between smoking and obesity in the development of co-morbidities, involving an enzyme cascade that originates in adipose tissue considered a site for production of cytokines (TNF-a, IL-6, etc), while adiponectin decreases with increased adiposity. This increases insulin resistance, circulating free radicals and oxidative stress, exacerbating the initial pulmonary inflammation. Adipose tissue stimulation is promoted by tissue hypoxia, smoking and the degree of bronchial obstruction.18192021Severity of systemic inflammation is a direct measure of severity of COPD. In our study more than two-third of the subjects had moderate to severe COPD who had DM, which is in agreement with many cohort studies which have demonstrated that moderate to severe COPD increases the risk of DM (OR 1.4 and 1.5, respectively).15 In a large cohort of females, Song et al.,22 showed that the presence of asthma or COPD was associated with risk of developing T2DM, suggesting that airway inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes. Conversely, in a US cohort, the relative risk of developing COPD was higher (HR 1.22) in patients with diabetes than in non-diabetics.23 It is well known fact that DM significantly affects the outcome of COPD including time to first hospitalisation and 5-years mortality rates.15 According to the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, the HR for COPD-related death was 1.27 as compared to subjects without diabetes.24 Another study showed that an increase in blood glucose of 1 mmol/L increases the risk of death by 15%.25 Parrapil et al. and Baker et al., confirmed an increased risk of death (OR 1.93) and hospital stays were 10.3% longer for patients with diabetes hospitalized for COPD exacerbation.2627An important observation in the present study was that about 4.39% of COPDpatients were newly diagnosed as having DM. This is very significant finding as large number of COPDpatients in our country are usually not screened for DM. Also significant number of patients with COPD in our country receive high dose of inhaled corticosteroids for severe cases and systemic corticosteroids during exacerbations.The present study is exceptional as it could detect as many as 5% of COPDpatients who did not have DM but had deranged FBS (110-126 mg/dl). This could add to the pool of high risk patients developing DM in future when exposed to the stress of COPD and exacerbations. Among the known and new DMpatients, 39.43% of patients in our study had poor DM control with HbA1c more than 8.India with population more than 1.27 billion has the highest number of both COPD and DMpatients. In total two-third Indian population reside in rural areas and smaller towns where facilities for diagnosis of COPD are inadequate. In the past 50-60 years there has been significant change in the life style, food habits, decreased physical activity and obesity in Indian population. Consequences of which, there has been escalating epidemic of DM in both rural and urban populations. It is also worth noting that uncontrolled and undiagnosed DM in COPDpatients have greater impact on the outcome of COPD in the form of severity, quality of life, exacerbations, hospital stay, health care costs and death. Screening for active DM in COPD should lead to earlier detection of DM and prompt treatment of COPD and good control of DM as well.The strengths of the present study are that we implemented the screening within the routine system with no special budget ., allocated to support these activities. We think that because of their higher risk of DM and the fact that patients with COPD are anyway more likely to attend health facilities, the marginal costs for DM screening using a symptom-base approach with blood glucose testing are likely to be small and proved cost effective. Hence active screening of COPDpatients for DM is feasible and imperative in routine health care settings. The limitation of the study is a single centre screening and further studies are suggested on larger geographical areas.
CONCLUSION
Prevalence of DM in COPDpatients in present study is 25.63% when actively screened in tertiary care hospital. It is feasible and imperative to screen all COPDpatients for DM in all health care facilities routinely.
Authors: S Rennard; M Decramer; P M A Calverley; N B Pride; J B Soriano; P A Vermeire; J Vestbo Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Bartolomé R Celli; Nicola E Thomas; Julie A Anderson; Gary T Ferguson; Christine R Jenkins; Paul W Jones; Jørgen Vestbo; Katharine Knobil; Julie C Yates; Peter M A Calverley Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: E B Rimm; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Pei Gao; Nadeem Sarwar; Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai; Stephen Kaptoge; Peter H Whincup; Kenneth J Mukamal; Richard F Gillum; Ingar Holme; Inger Njølstad; Astrid Fletcher; Peter Nilsson; Sarah Lewington; Rory Collins; Vilmundur Gudnason; Simon G Thompson; Naveed Sattar; Elizabeth Selvin; Frank B Hu; John Danesh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samantha F Ehrlich; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Jun Shan; Assiamira Ferrara Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 19.112