Literature DB >> 25838287

Evaluation of fingerstick cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay in HIV-infected persons: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Darlisha A Williams1, Tadeo Kiiza2, Richard Kwizera2, Reuben Kiggundu2, Sruti Velamakanni3, David B Meya4, Joshua Rhein1, David R Boulware3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcus neoformans is the most common cause of adult meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa. The cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) lateral flow assay (LFA) has simplified diagnosis as a point-of-care test approved for serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We evaluated the accuracy of the CRAG LFA using fingerstick whole blood compared with serum/plasma and CSF for diagnosing meningitis.
METHODS: From August 2013 to August 2014, CRAG LFA (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) tests were performed on fingerstick whole blood, plasma/serum, and CSF in 207 HIV-infected adults with suspected meningitis in Kampala, Uganda. Venous blood was also collected and centrifuged to obtain serum and/or plasma. CSF was tested after lumbar puncture.
RESULTS: Of 207 participants, 149 (72%) had fingerstick CRAG-positive results. There was 100% agreement between fingerstick whole blood and serum/plasma. Of the 149 fingerstick CRAG-positive participants, 138 (93%) had evidence of cryptococcal meningitis with a positive CSF CRAG. Eleven participants (5%) had isolated cryptococcal antigenemia with a negative CSF CRAG and culture, of whom 8 had CSF abnormalities (n = 3 lymphocytic pleocytosis, n = 5 elevated protein, n = 4 increased opening pressure). No persons with cryptococcal meningitis had negative fingersticks.
CONCLUSIONS: The 100% agreement between whole blood, serum, and plasma CRAG LFA results demonstrates that fingerstick CRAG is a reliable bedside diagnostic test. Using point-of-care CRAG testing simplifies screening large numbers of patients and enables physicians to prioritize on whom to measure CSF opening pressure using manometers.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; cryptococcal meningitis; cryptococcus; lateral flow assay; point-of-care systems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25838287      PMCID: PMC4503809          DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


Cryptococcal meningitis is the most common cause of adult meningitis in Africa and causes 20%–25% of AIDS-related deaths [1-4], accounting for 30%–60% of adult meningitis cases overall in the general population in eastern and southern Africa [3-7]. Typically, cryptococcal meningitis is diagnosed by performing a lumbar puncture (LP) with testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by either India ink microscopy, culture, or cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) [8, 9]. In 2011, a CRAG lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFA) (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This point-of-care test has been validated in serum and CSF, with 99.3% sensitivity and >99.1% specificity in CSF [8]. Although the introduction of the CRAG LFA has made testing more feasible in resource-limited settings, a fundamental paradox remains that the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis cannot be confirmed until after the diagnostic LP. Intracranial pressure measurement and control are key components of cryptococcal management [10-12]. When the Cryptococcus diagnosis is made after the LP is completed, the opportunity to remove sufficient CSF volume to normalize the intracranial pressure is missed, unless manometers are always used. The known presence of CRAG in blood prior to obtaining a diagnostic LP shifts the pretest probability for cryptococcal meningitis significantly, alerting caregivers to the necessity of measuring LP opening pressure and allowing for more focused, cost-effective downstream CSF testing [3]. We hypothesized that performing a fingerstick CRAG LFA is a simple, low-cost point-of-care method that can be used to rapidly identify persons with cryptococcosis. This information can then determine which patients with suspected meningitis require measurement of the CSF opening pressure during an LP with a manometer or an improvised manometer using intravenous tubing and a meter stick [13]. Capillary fingerstick whole-blood collection has the additional advantage of being less invasive than obtaining venous blood and does not require a centrifuge for serum or plasma separation, and bedside testing can be performed rapidly during informed consent for the LP. We evaluated the accuracy of the CRAG LFA using fingerstick whole blood to screen for meningitis compared with serum/plasma or CSF.

METHODS

From August 2013 to August 2014, we enrolled a prospective cohort of 207 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected adults with symptoms of suspected meningitis who were admitted to Mulago National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Screening was performed as part of the Adjunctive Sertraline for the Treatment of HIV-Associated Meningitis (ASTRO-CM) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01802385). Institutional review board approvals occurred at all relevant institutions in Uganda and Minnesota. Inclusion criteria included physician-suspected meningitis, age ≥18 years, and written informed consent.

Fingerstick Assay

After obtaining verbal consent, a fingerstick CRAG LFA was performed. The pad of the index finger was sterilized with an alcohol swab, and a lancet was used to prick the finger and produce 1 drop of whole blood. The patient's finger was quickly placed directly on the tip of the LFA test strip so that the blood sample (approximately 40 µL) could be absorbed directly onto the LFA strip. The test strip was then placed in a 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube containing 1–2 drops of sample diluent, and allowed to incubate in an upright position at room temperature for 10 minutes. CRAG LFAs were read by trained study personnel. This included the phlebotomist and the study medical officers. Supplementary video demonstrates how the fingerstick CRAG LFA was performed. As the fingerstick CRAG LFA incubated, written informed consent was obtained for permission to conduct an LP and participate in the study. The CRAG LFA result was used to prioritize on whom to use manometers to measure CSF opening pressure. LPs were then performed in the lateral decubitus position.

Parallel Testing of Serum and Plasma

Serum (n = 206) and plasma (n = 27) were collected via venipuncture by a phlebotomist. Serum and/or plasma were tested separately for CRAG LFA by adding 40 µL of specimen to Eppendorf tubes containing 1 drop of sample diluent. CRAG LFA dipsticks were placed into each tube and read after 10 minutes. Serum and plasma were interchangeably tested, per prior published equivalence [8].

CSF Analysis

All CSF samples had a CRAG LFA performed at bedside, collecting 1 drop of CSF into an Eppendorf tube with 1 drop of sample diluent. All CSF CRAG LFA tests were performed twice, once by the clinical staff on the hospital ward and a second time by a microbiologist upon processing the CSF sample. Quantitative fungal cultures were performed using 5 serial 10-fold dilutions of CSF [8, 14]. Further analysis was performed on CSF samples to determine the white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential, and protein measurements. Persons with negative fingerstick and CSF CRAG also had Gram stain and enhanced tuberculosis meningitis diagnostics performed through a streamlined diagnostic approach [3]. These diagnostics included GeneXpert, acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy, and tuberculosis cultures.

Statistical Analysis

The diagnostic performance (ie, sensitivity and specificity) of fingerstick CRAG was compared against a composite reference standard of either serum/plasma or CSF CRAG positivity. The relationship between positive fingerstick CRAG, CSF CRAG, and CSF culture was also examined to determine the concordance and positive predictive value of fingerstick testing.

RESULTS

Overall, 207 participants with suspected meningitis were enrolled, of whom 72% (n = 149) had evidence of cryptococcosis. Sixty percent (125/207) of participants were male, with a median age of 36 years (interquartile range [IQR], 30–42 years). Participants were HIV infected with a median CD4 T-cell count of 25 cells/µL (IQR, 9–73 cells/µL; maximum, 660 cells/µL) and with 51% (105/207) receiving antiretroviral therapy at diagnosis. Among patients reporting antecedent headache at diagnosis (n = 193), the median headache duration was 14 days (IQR, 7–21 days). The Glasgow Coma Scale score was <15 in 47% (98/207) of patients at presentation. The median CSF white cell count was <5 cells/µL (IQR, <5–60 cells/µL), with 67% having <5 white cells/µL. Median CSF protein at diagnosis was 50 mg/dL (IQR, 20–99 mg/dL). Approximately 141 participants had their CSF opening pressures measured at screening; the median opening pressure was 280 mm H2O (IQR, 180–430 mm H2O). Of persons without cryptococcosis, 1 participant had Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis by Gram stain with polymerase chain reaction confirmation (0.5% prevalence). Tuberculosis meningitis was confirmed by GeneXpert and/or culture in 15 participants. The remaining CRAG-negative participants had aseptic/viral meningitis of predominantly unknown etiology. Of the 207 CRAG LFA tests performed on fingerstick whole blood, 149 (72%) were positive, of which 138 (93%) were also CSF CRAG positive. Among the 207 participants with CRAG LFA tests performed in serum or plasma, 149 (72%) were positive (Figure 1). There was 100% concordance between plasma and serum CRAG results (n = 26; where both serum and plasma were available). Among those fingerstick CRAG-positive, 93% (138/149) were also CSF CRAG positive. Of those CSF CRAG positive, 91% (127/139) also had positive cryptococcal culture growth (range, 10 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL to >15 million CFU/mL). No persons who tested fingerstick (or CSF) CRAG negative grew Cryptococcus in culture (100% negative predictive value). Furthermore, there was 100% concordance between fingerstick whole blood and serum/plasma (κ = 1.0; 95% confidence interval lower bound, 0.979). The positive predictive value of fingerstick LFA for the detection of cryptococcal infection in blood was 100% (149/149) and for cryptococcal meningitis was 93% (138/149). Eleven (5%) participants had isolated cryptococcal antigenemia without proven CSF Cryptococcus infection that was represented by CRAG-positive fingerstick and CRAG-positive serum/plasma, but negative CSF CRAG and negative culture. Of these 11 fingerstick CRAG-positive and CSF CRAG-negative participants, 8 had CSF abnormalities (n = 3 with CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis, n = 5 with increased CSF protein [>45 mg/dL], and n = 4 with elevated opening pressure >200 mm H2O).
Figure 1.

Distribution of cryptococcal diagnostics in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The concordance of fingerstick cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) testing was κ = 1.0 for blood (P = .99) and κ = 0.947 for CSF representing 5% of participants (n = 11) having isolated cryptococcal antigenemia in peripheral blood with early disseminated cryptococcal infection but without microbiologically proven meningeal involvement. Of these 11 blood CRAG-positive and CSF CRAG-negative participants, 8 participants had abnormal CSF profiles with CSF inflammation or increased opening pressure. Fifty-eight participants were negative for all cryptococcal testing in blood and CSF. No person had CSF cryptococcal involvement by CRAG or culture who was CRAG-negative by fingerstick or in peripheral blood.

Distribution of cryptococcal diagnostics in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The concordance of fingerstick cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) testing was κ = 1.0 for blood (P = .99) and κ = 0.947 for CSF representing 5% of participants (n = 11) having isolated cryptococcal antigenemia in peripheral blood with early disseminated cryptococcal infection but without microbiologically proven meningeal involvement. Of these 11 blood CRAG-positive and CSF CRAG-negative participants, 8 participants had abnormal CSF profiles with CSF inflammation or increased opening pressure. Fifty-eight participants were negative for all cryptococcal testing in blood and CSF. No person had CSF cryptococcal involvement by CRAG or culture who was CRAG-negative by fingerstick or in peripheral blood. The time of point-of-care testing at the hospital bedside (10 minutes) was less than our prior experience of a median of 4 hours 50 minutes for laboratory-based CRAG testing at the same site [8].

DISCUSSION

CRAG testing of whole blood by capillary fingerstick had 100% concordance with serum or plasma CRAG results collected by venipuncture. Fingerstick CRAG had 100% negative predictive value for excluding cryptococcal meningitis. The ability to conduct reliable fingerstick CRAG testing overcomes a clinical management paradox. Previous studies have found a significant improvement in acute mortality when patients are able to receive at least 1 therapeutic LP to normalize intracranial pressure [11]. However, a major challenge to managing cryptococcal meningitis is that the diagnosis is typically confirmed only after an LP is performed, thus making it difficult to measure and manage intracranial pressure, unless CSF opening pressures are universally measured. Manometers are rarely available in low-income countries, and not always used in high-income countries where available. Improvised measurement of CSF opening pressure can be conducted using intravenous tubing and a meter stick [13]; however, this requires additional physician time. By CRAG screening prior to the LP, one can prioritize on whom to measure opening pressure or empirically remove 20–25 mL CSF, which was the median amount removed in this cohort [11, 13]. Additionally, healthcare workers in both rural and urban areas can also easily screen persons with HIV or suspected meningitis using fingerstick, and quickly exclude cryptococcosis or refer symptomatic CRAG-positive persons to the hospital for LPs. Another challenge with traditional diagnostic methods (eg, CRAG latex agglutination, culture) is the necessary infrastructure and laboratory skilled labor required for testing. The CRAG LFA represents an important diagnostic advance, providing an affordable point-of-care test that can be performed at the bedside on blood to influence pretest probability and repeated at time of LP to confirm the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. The CRAG LFA is easy to use, reliable, and versatile. It can be performed on serum, plasma, whole blood, urine, or CSF [8, 9]. Notably, CRAG testing of saliva performs less optimally (88% sensitivity and 98% specificity) [15]. LFA tests performed at the bedside also expedite antifungal treatment. Although the CRAG LFA has been previously validated in serum and CSF [8], we wanted to investigate the accuracy of using fingerstick whole blood, which is easier to collect and provides a quicker method for diagnosis compared with collecting CSF or serum/plasma. The fingerstick CRAG LFA showed a 100% agreement with serum and/or plasma. Of participants who were fingerstick CRAG positive, 93% were also CSF CRAG positive, with the others having isolated cryptococcal antigenemia, which also requires treatment [16]. No test is 100% perfect, and a larger sample size may have eventually uncovered false positives or false negatives; however, in real-world use, fingerstick testing performed very well. Given the poor outcomes of patients with cryptococcal meningitis [17], typical delays in diagnosis [18], and the documented approximately 70% relative survival benefit at 10 days of repeated therapeutic LPs to reduce ICP [11], using the fingerstick CRAG LFA as a rapid initial step toward establishing a diagnosis can enable better treatment. Fingerstick CRAG testing represents an important and simple tool for meningitis diagnosis worldwide.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online (http://cid.oxfordjournals.org). Supplementary materials consist of data provided by the author that are published to benefit the reader. The posted materials are not copyedited. The contents of all supplementary data are the sole responsibility of the authors. Questions or messages regarding errors should be addressed to the author.
  17 in total

1.  Diagnosis of cryptococcal and tuberculous meningitis in a resource-limited African setting.

Authors:  Danielle B Cohen; Eduard E Zijlstra; Mavuto Mukaka; Miriam Reiss; Shizzie Kamphambale; Maarten Scholing; Peter I Waitt; Florian Neuhann
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Shigella isolates from humans in South Africa, 2003-2009.

Authors:  Nomsa P Tau; Anthony M Smith; Arvinda Sooka; Karen H Keddy
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Evaluation of a novel point-of-care cryptococcal antigen test on serum, plasma, and urine from patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis.

Authors:  Joseph N Jarvis; Ann Percival; Sean Bauman; Joy Pelfrey; Graeme Meintjes; G Ntombomzi Williams; Nicky Longley; Thomas S Harrison; Thomas R Kozel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Cryptococcal meningitis management in Tanzania with strict schedule of serial lumber punctures using intravenous tubing sets: an operational research study.

Authors:  John Meda; Samuel Kalluvya; Jennifer A Downs; Awilly A Chofle; Jeremiah Seni; Benson Kidenya; Daniel W Fitzgerald; Robert N Peck
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Benjamin J Park; Kathleen A Wannemuehler; Barbara J Marston; Nelesh Govender; Peter G Pappas; Tom M Chiller
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  The medical management of central nervous system infections in Uganda and the potential impact of an algorithm-based approach to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Joel D Trachtenberg; Andrew D Kambugu; Mehri McKellar; Fred Semitala; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Matthew H Samore; Allan Ronald; Merle A Sande
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america.

Authors:  John R Perfect; William E Dismukes; Francoise Dromer; David L Goldman; John R Graybill; Richard J Hamill; Thomas S Harrison; Robert A Larsen; Olivier Lortholary; Minh-Hong Nguyen; Peter G Pappas; William G Powderly; Nina Singh; Jack D Sobel; Tania C Sorrell
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Cost-effective diagnostic checklists for meningitis in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Kara N Durski; Karen M Kuntz; Kosuke Yasukawa; Beth A Virnig; David B Meya; David R Boulware
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Adult meningitis in a setting of high HIV and TB prevalence: findings from 4961 suspected cases.

Authors:  Joseph N Jarvis; Graeme Meintjes; Anthony Williams; Yolande Brown; Tom Crede; Thomas S Harrison
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Multisite validation of cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay and quantification by laser thermal contrast.

Authors:  David R Boulware; Melissa A Rolfes; Radha Rajasingham; Maximilian von Hohenberg; Zhenpeng Qin; Kabanda Taseera; Charlotte Schutz; Richard Kwizera; Elissa K Butler; Graeme Meintjes; Conrad Muzoora; John C Bischof; David B Meya
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Dynamiker Cryptococcal Antigen Lateral Flow Assay for the Diagnosis of HIV-Associated Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Richard Kwizera; Denis Omali; Kiiza Tadeo; John Kasibante; Morris K Rutakingirwa; Enock Kagimu; Kenneth Ssebambulidde; Darlisha A Williams; Joshua Rhein; David Boulware; David B Meya
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Point-of-Care Testing for Infectious Diseases: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Thomas R Kozel; Amanda R Burnham-Marusich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Cryptococcal meningitis: epidemiology, immunology, diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Peter R Williamson; Joseph N Jarvis; Anil A Panackal; Matthew C Fisher; Síle F Molloy; Angela Loyse; Thomas S Harrison
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 4.  Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Eileen K Maziarz; John R Perfect
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  Point-of-Care Testing for Cryptococcal Disease Among Hospitalized Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Adults in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Admasu Tenna Mamuye; Ethan Bornstein; Obsie Temesgen; Henry M Blumberg; Russell R Kempker
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Deep fungal infections diagnosed by histology in Uganda: a 70-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Richard Kwizera; Felix Bongomin; Robert Lukande
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Brief Report: Point of Care Cryptococcal Antigen Screening: Pipetting Finger-Prick Blood Improves Performance of Immunomycologics Lateral Flow Assay.

Authors:  Rachel M Wake; Joseph N Jarvis; Thomas S Harrison; Nelesh P Govender
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 8.  Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnostics and Screening in the Era of Point-of-Care Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Radha Rajasingham; Rachel M Wake; Tafese Beyene; Andrew Katende; Emilio Letang; David R Boulware
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Symptomatic Cryptococcal Antigenemia Presenting as Early Cryptococcal Meningitis With Negative Cerebral Spinal Fluid Analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Ssebambulidde; Ananta S Bangdiwala; Richard Kwizera; Tadeo Kiiza Kandole; Lillian Tugume; Reuben Kiggundu; Edward Mpoza; Edwin Nuwagira; Darlisha A Williams; Sarah M Lofgren; Mahsa Abassi; Abdu K Musubire; Fiona V Cresswell; Joshua Rhein; Conrad Muzoora; Kathy Huppler Hullsiek; David R Boulware; David B Meya
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Poor specificity of urinary cryptococcal antigen testing: Reply to Drain et al. Prevalence of cryptococcal antigenuria at initial HIV diagnosis in KwaZulu-Natal.

Authors:  M W Tenforde; N Longley; D B Meya; D R Boulware; G Meintjes; I Goercke; T S Harrison; J N Jarvis
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.180

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.