Jobst Frisius1, Marcel Ebeling2, Matthias Karst3, Rudolf Fahlbusch4, Ingolf Schedel5, Venelin Gerganov4, Amir Samii4, Wolf Lüdemann6. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany. 2. Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: Luedemann@ini-hannover.de.
Abstract
OBJECT: To evaluate the introduction of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression additionally to the use of compression stockings, low molecular weight heparin-LMWH and early mobilization, a retrospective study in cranial neurosurgery using intraoperative MRI was performed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 207 neurosurgical patients using intraoperative MRI was performed. A group of 86 patients was treated with the additional use of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression until mobilization out of bed. One hundred twenty-one patients were treated without the use of additional pneumatic compression. Postoperatively the patients were screened for deep venous thrombosis by ultrasound and pulmonary embolism by CT-scan if suspicious. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The development of deep venous thrombosis was reduced from 9.9% to 3.5% in our patients with the additional use of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression. That is a 64.6% relative risk reduction to develop deep venous thrombosis with the use of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression. An additional 52% relative risk reduction was found for the chance of developing pulmonary embolism. In the 15 patients with detected deep venous thrombosis, the OR-time was more than 100 min longer than in the 192 patients without detected deep venous thrombosis. The difference between both groups was significant. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the benefit of pneumatic compression with a risk reduction for the development of thromboembolic complications. OR-time is another risk factor that attributes to a significant risk for the development of thromboembolic complications.
OBJECT: To evaluate the introduction of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression additionally to the use of compression stockings, low molecular weight heparin-LMWH and early mobilization, a retrospective study in cranial neurosurgery using intraoperative MRI was performed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 207 neurosurgical patients using intraoperative MRI was performed. A group of 86 patients was treated with the additional use of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression until mobilization out of bed. One hundred twenty-one patients were treated without the use of additional pneumatic compression. Postoperatively the patients were screened for deep venous thrombosis by ultrasound and pulmonary embolism by CT-scan if suspicious. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The development of deep venous thrombosis was reduced from 9.9% to 3.5% in our patients with the additional use of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression. That is a 64.6% relative risk reduction to develop deep venous thrombosis with the use of intraoperative and postoperative pneumatic compression. An additional 52% relative risk reduction was found for the chance of developing pulmonary embolism. In the 15 patients with detected deep venous thrombosis, the OR-time was more than 100 min longer than in the 192 patients without detected deep venous thrombosis. The difference between both groups was significant. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the benefit of pneumatic compression with a risk reduction for the development of thromboembolic complications. OR-time is another risk factor that attributes to a significant risk for the development of thromboembolic complications.
Authors: David Liu; Erica Peterson; James Dooner; Mark Baerlocher; Leslie Zypchen; Joel Gagnon; Michael Delorme; Chad Kim Sing; Jason Wong; Randolph Guzman; Gavin Greenfield; Otto Moodley; Paul Yenson Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Lorenzo Rinaldo; Desmond A Brown; Adip G Bhargav; Aaron E Rusheen; Ryan M Naylor; Hannah E Gilder; Dileep D Monie; Stephanie J Youssef; Ian F Parney Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 5.115