BACKGROUND: Harm reduction agencies complement addiction treatment by providing diverse services that improve the health of people who use drugs. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) is an effective opioid addiction treatment that may be provided from flexible settings, potentially including harm reduction agencies. This study investigated attitudes toward different potential sites for BMT (harm reduction agencies, general medical clinics, and drug treatment programs) among harm reduction clients. METHODS: Using computer-based interviews, participants indicated preferred potential site for BMT (harm reduction agency, drug treatment program, or general medical clinic), interest in BMT by potential site, motivation for treatment, and barriers to BMT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with harm reduction agency preference. RESULTS: Of 102 opioid users, the most preferred potential site for BMT was a harm reduction agency (51%), whereas fewer preferred general medical clinics (13%), drug treatment programs (12%), or were not interested in BMT (25%). In multivariable analysis, experiencing ≥1 barrier to BMT was strongly associated with preferring harm reduction agencies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-11.43). CONCLUSIONS: The potential to initiate BMT at harm reduction agencies is highly favorable among harm reduction clients, especially among those experiencing barriers to BMT. Offering BMT at harm reduction agencies could improve access to treatment, but studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy of this approach.
BACKGROUND:Harm reduction agencies complement addiction treatment by providing diverse services that improve the health of people who use drugs. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) is an effective opioid addiction treatment that may be provided from flexible settings, potentially including harm reduction agencies. This study investigated attitudes toward different potential sites for BMT (harm reduction agencies, general medical clinics, and drug treatment programs) among harm reduction clients. METHODS: Using computer-based interviews, participants indicated preferred potential site for BMT (harm reduction agency, drug treatment program, or general medical clinic), interest in BMT by potential site, motivation for treatment, and barriers to BMT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with harm reduction agency preference. RESULTS: Of 102 opioid users, the most preferred potential site for BMT was a harm reduction agency (51%), whereas fewer preferred general medical clinics (13%), drug treatment programs (12%), or were not interested in BMT (25%). In multivariable analysis, experiencing ≥1 barrier to BMT was strongly associated with preferring harm reduction agencies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-11.43). CONCLUSIONS: The potential to initiate BMT at harm reduction agencies is highly favorable among harm reduction clients, especially among those experiencing barriers to BMT. Offering BMT at harm reduction agencies could improve access to treatment, but studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy of this approach.
Entities:
Keywords:
Access to care; buprenorphine; harm reduction agencies; opioid addiction
Authors: Shashi N Kapadia; Judith L Griffin; Justine Waldman; Nicolas R Ziebarth; Bruce R Schackman; Czarina N Behrends Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Andrea M Lopez; Matthew Thomann; Zena Dhatt; Julieta Ferrera; Marwa Al-Nassir; Margaret Ambrose; Shane Sullivan Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea Jakubowski; Brianna L Norton; Benjamin T Hayes; Brent E Gibson; Christine Fitzsimmons; L Synn Stern; Franklin Ramirez; Mercedes Guzman; Susan Spratt; Pia Marcus; Aaron D Fox Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Benjamin T Hayes; Andrea Jakubowski; Christine Fitzsimmons; Billy Garcia; Franklin Ramirez; Aaron D Fox Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Kristi Hill; Laura Nussdorf; Julia D Mount; Rachel Silk; Chloe Gross; David Sternberg; Phyllis Bijole; Miriam Jones; Randy Kier; Dana Mccullough; Poonam Mathur; Shyam Kottilil; Henry Masur; Sarah Kattakuzhy; Elana S Rosenthal Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2022 Jan-Feb 01 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Marcus A Bachhuber; Cole Thompson; Ann Prybylowski; José Benitez; Silvana Mazzella; David Barclay Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 3.984