Literature DB >> 25836758

Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice.

Ryan Cronk1, Tom Slaymaker2, Jamie Bartram3.   

Abstract

Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health care facilities; Monitoring and evaluation; Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Schools; Typology; Workplaces

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25836758     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  13 in total

1.  Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Rural Health-Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia.

Authors:  Amy Guo; J Michael Bowling; Jamie Bartram; Georgia Kayser
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Necessary conditions for sustainable water and sanitation service delivery in schools: A systematic review.

Authors:  Christine JiaRui Pu; Poojan Patel; Gracie Hornsby; Gary L Darmstadt; Jennifer Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Water, sanitation, and hygiene in schools in low socio-economic regions in Nicaragua: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Tania Jordanova; Ryan Cronk; Wanda Obando; Octavio Zeledon Medina; Rinko Kinoshita; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Global monitoring of water supply and sanitation: history, methods and future challenges.

Authors:  Jamie Bartram; Clarissa Brocklehurst; Michael B Fisher; Rolf Luyendijk; Rifat Hossain; Tessa Wardlaw; Bruce Gordon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Socio-Economic Factors Analysis of Improved Sanitation in China, 2006⁻2015.

Authors:  Qing Luo; Mengjie Zhang; Wei Yao; Yanfen Fu; Haichun Wei; Yong Tao; Jianjun Liu; Hongyan Yao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Indicators for Monitoring Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: A Systematic Review of Indicator Selection Methods.

Authors:  Stefanie Schwemlein; Ryan Cronk; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fecal Contamination and Inadequate Treatment of Packaged Water.

Authors:  Ashley R Williams; Robert E S Bain; Michael B Fisher; Ryan Cronk; Emma R Kelly; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors associated with latrine utilization among model and non-model families in Laelai Maichew Woreda, Aksum, Tigray, Ethiopia: comparative community based study.

Authors:  Gidey Gebremedhin; Desalegn Tetemke; Meresa Gebremedhin; Gizienesh Kahsay; Hiwot Zelalem; Hailay Syum; Hadgu Gerensea
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-08-13

9.  Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Service Availability at Rural Health Care Facilities in Southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Edgar Mugema Mulogo; Micheal Matte; Andrew Wesuta; Fred Bagenda; Richard Apecu; Moses Ntaro
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2018-08-27

10.  Do Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Conditions in Primary Schools Consistently Support Schoolgirls' Menstrual Needs? A Longitudinal Study in Rural Western Kenya.

Authors:  Kelly T Alexander; Garazi Zulaika; Elizabeth Nyothach; Clifford Oduor; Linda Mason; David Obor; Alie Eleveld; Kayla F Laserson; Penelope A Phillips-Howard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.