Literature DB >> 25835978

Lifetime effectiveness of mifamurtide addition to chemotherapy in nonmetastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma: a Markov process model analysis.

Hyun Jin Song1, Jun Ah Lee2, Euna Han3, Eui-Kyung Lee4.   

Abstract

The mortality and progression rates in osteosarcoma differ depending on the presence of metastasis. A decision model would be useful for estimating long-term effectiveness of treatment with limited clinical trial data. The aim of this study was to explore the lifetime effectiveness of the addition of mifamurtide to chemotherapy for patients with metastatic and nonmetastatic osteosarcoma. The target population was osteosarcoma patients with or without metastasis. A Markov process model was used, whose time horizon was lifetime with a starting age of 13 years. There were five health states: disease-free (DF), recurrence, post-recurrence disease-free, post-recurrence disease-progression, and death. Transition probabilities of the starting state, DF, were calculated from the INT-0133 clinical trials for chemotherapy with and without mifamurtide. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) increased upon addition of mifamurtide to chemotherapy by 10.5 % (10.13 and 9.17 QALY with and without mifamurtide, respectively) and 45.2 % (7.23 and 4.98 QALY with and without mifamurtide, respectively) relative to the lifetime effectiveness of chemotherapy in nonmetastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma, respectively. Life-years gained (LYG) increased by 10.1 % (13.10 LYG with mifamurtide and 11.90 LYG without mifamurtide) in nonmetastatic patients and 42.2 % (9.43 LYG with mifamurtide and 6.63 LYG without mifamurtide) in metastatic osteosarcoma patients. The Markov model analysis showed that chemotherapy with mifamurtide improved the lifetime effectiveness compared to chemotherapy alone in both nonmetastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma. Relative effectiveness of the therapy was higher in metastatic than nonmetastatic osteosarcoma over lifetime. However, absolute lifetime effectiveness was higher in nonmetastatic than metastatic osteosarcoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision analysis; Markov model; Mifamurtide; Osteosarcoma; Quality-adjusted life-years

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25835978     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3405-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  11 in total

Review 1.  Osteosarcoma: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  S Bielack; D Carrle; P G Casali
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Risk stratification based on the clinical factors at diagnosis is closely related to the survival of localized osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jun Ah Lee; Min Suk Kim; Dong Ho Kim; Jung Sub Lim; Kyung Duk Park; Won Seok Song; Wan Hyeong Cho; Soo-Yong Lee; Dae-Geun Jeon
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols.

Authors:  Stefan S Bielack; Beate Kempf-Bielack; Günter Delling; G Ulrich Exner; Silke Flege; Knut Helmke; Rainer Kotz; Mechthild Salzer-Kuntschik; Matthias Werner; Winfried Winkelmann; Andreas Zoubek; Heribert Jürgens; Kurt Winkler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The addition of mifamurtide to chemotherapy improves lifetime effectiveness in children with osteosarcoma: a Markov model analysis.

Authors:  Hyun Jin Song; Eui-Kyung Lee; Jun Ah Lee; Hye-Lin Kim; Kyoung Won Jang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-30

5.  Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate.

Authors:  Paul A Meyers; Cindy L Schwartz; Mark Krailo; Eugenie S Kleinerman; Donna Betcher; Mark L Bernstein; Ernest Conrad; William Ferguson; Mark Gebhardt; Allen M Goorin; Michael B Harris; John Healey; Andrew Huvos; Michael Link; Joseph Montebello; Helen Nadel; Michael Nieder; Judith Sato; Gene Siegal; Michael Weiner; Robert Wells; Lester Wold; Richard Womer; Holcombe Grier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Mifamurtide for the treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Kosei Ando; Kanji Mori; Nedège Corradini; Françoise Redini; Dominique Heymann
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.889

7.  Mifamurtide for high-grade, resectable, nonmetastatic osteosarcoma following surgical resection: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Johal; Stephen Ralston; Christopher Knight
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Second and subsequent recurrences of osteosarcoma: presentation, treatment, and outcomes of 249 consecutive cooperative osteosarcoma study group patients.

Authors:  Stefan S Bielack; Beate Kempf-Bielack; Detlev Branscheid; Dorothe Carrle; Godehard Friedel; Knut Helmke; Matthias Kevric; Gernot Jundt; Thomas Kühne; Rainer Maas; Rudolf Schwarz; Andreas Zoubek; Heribert Jürgens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Osteosarcoma: the addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy improves overall survival--a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Paul A Meyers; Cindy L Schwartz; Mark D Krailo; John H Healey; Mark L Bernstein; Donna Betcher; William S Ferguson; Mark C Gebhardt; Allen M Goorin; Michael Harris; Eugenie Kleinerman; Michael P Link; Helen Nadel; Michael Nieder; Gene P Siegal; Michael A Weiner; Robert J Wells; Richard B Womer; Holcombe E Grier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Alexander J Chou; Eugenie S Kleinerman; Mark D Krailo; Zhengjia Chen; Donna L Betcher; John H Healey; Ernest U Conrad; Michael L Nieder; Michael A Weiner; Robert J Wells; Richard B Womer; Paul A Meyers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Muramyl dipeptide-based analogs as potential anticancer compounds: Strategies to improve selectivity, biocompatibility, and efficiency.

Authors:  Eliza Iwicka; Justyna Hajtuch; Krystyna Dzierzbicka; Iwona Inkielewicz-Stepniak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.