Literature DB >> 25835945

Improving ecological response monitoring of environmental flows.

Alison J King1, Ben Gawne, Leah Beesley, John D Koehn, Daryl L Nielsen, Amina Price.   

Abstract

Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25835945     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  11 in total

1.  Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart E Bunn; Angela H Arthington
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Putting the "ecology" into environmental flows: ecological dynamics and demographic modelling.

Authors:  Will Shenton; Nicholas R Bond; Jian D L Yen; Ralph Mac Nally
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Monitoring does not always count.

Authors:  Eve McDonald-Madden; Peter W J Baxter; Richard A Fuller; Tara G Martin; Edward T Game; Jensen Montambault; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Ecology. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts.

Authors:  E S Bernhardt; M A Palmer; J D Allan; G Alexander; K Barnas; S Brooks; J Carr; S Clayton; C Dahm; J Follstad-Shah; D Galat; S Gloss; P Goodwin; D Hart; B Hassett; R Jenkinson; S Katz; G M Kondolf; P S Lake; R Lave; J L Meyer; T K O'donnell; L Pagano; B Powell; E Sudduth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.

Authors:  Angela H Arthington; Stuart E Bunn; N LeRoy Poff; Robert J Naiman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Gene E Likens
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river.

Authors:  Christopher T Robinson; Urs Uehlinger
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Crisis water management and ibis breeding at Narran Lakes in arid Australia.

Authors:  K J Brandis; R T Kingsford; S Ren; D Ramp
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Mark-recapture models with parameters constant in time.

Authors:  G M Jolly
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Ecological success in stream restoration: case studies from the midwestern United States.

Authors:  Gretchen G Alexander; J David Allan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 3.644

View more
  4 in total

1.  Benthic macroinvertebrates response to water management in a lowland river: effects of hydro-power vs irrigation off-stream diversions.

Authors:  Francesca Salmaso; Giuseppe Crosa; Paolo Espa; Gaetano Gentili; Silvia Quadroni; Serena Zaccara
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Assessing the Establishment and Implementation of Environmental Flows in Spain.

Authors:  Gabriel Mezger; Lucia De Stefano; Marta González Del Tánago
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Predicting the Influence of Streamflow on Migration and Spawning of a Threatened Diadromous Fish, the Australian Grayling Prototroctes Maraena.

Authors:  W M Koster; D A Crook; D R Dawson; S Gaskill; J R Morrongiello
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Identifying monitoring information needs that support the management of fish in large rivers.

Authors:  Timothy D Counihan; Kristen L Bouska; Shannon K Brewer; Robert B Jacobson; Andrew F Casper; Colin G Chapman; Ian R Waite; Kenneth R Sheehan; Mark Pyron; Elise R Irwin; Karen Riva-Murray; Alexa J McKerrow; Jennifer M Bayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.