| Literature DB >> 25835624 |
Stefania Clemente1, Roberta Nigro2, Caterina Oliviero3, Chiara Marchioni2, Marco Esposito4, Francesca Romana Giglioli5, Pietro Mancosu6, Carmelo Marino7, Serenella Russo4, Michele Stasi8, Lidia Strigari9, Ivan Veronese10, Valeria Landoni9.
Abstract
The increasing use of moderate (<35 fractions) and extreme (<5 fractions) hypofractionated radiation therapy in prostate cancer is yielding favorable results, both in terms of maintained biochemical response and toxicity. Several hypofractionation (HF) schemes for the treatment of prostate cancer are available, although there is considerable variability in the techniques used to manage intra-/interfraction motion and deliver radiation doses. We performed a review of the published studies on HF regimens as a topic of interest for the Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy working group, which is part of the Italian Association of Medical Physics. Aspects of organ motion management (imaging for contouring, target volume definition, and rectum/bladder preparation) and treatment delivery (prostate localization, image guided radiation therapy strategy and frequency) were evaluated and categorized to assess outcome relative to disease control and toxicity. Despite the heterogeneity of the data, some interesting trends that emerged from the review might be useful in identifying an optimum HF strategy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25835624 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ISSN: 0360-3016 Impact factor: 7.038