RATIONALE: Structural risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in adolescents have not been well characterized. Because many adolescents with OSAS are obese, we hypothesized that the anatomic OSAS risk factors would be more similar to those in adults than those in children. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the anatomic risk factors in adolescents with OSAS compared with obese and lean control subjects using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Three groups of adolescents (age range: 12-16 yr) underwent MRI: obese individuals with OSAS (n = 49), obese control subjects (n = 38), and lean control subjects (n = 50). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied 137 subjects and found that (1) obese adolescents with OSAS had increased adenotonsillar tissue compared with obese and lean control subjects; (2) obese OSAS adolescents had a smaller nasopharyngeal airway than control subjects; (3) the size of other upper airway soft tissue structures (volume of the tongue, parapharyngeal fat pads, lateral walls, and soft palate) was similar between subjects with OSAS and obese control subjects; (4) although there were no major craniofacial abnormalities in most of the adolescents with OSAS, the ratio of soft tissue to craniofacial space surrounding the airway was increased; and (5) there were sex differences in the pattern of lymphoid proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased size of the pharyngeal lymphoid tissue, rather than enlargement of the upper airway soft tissue structures, is the primary anatomic risk factor for OSAS in obese adolescents. These results are important for clinical decision making and suggest that adenotonsillectomy should be considered as the initial treatment for OSAS in obese adolescents, a group that has poor continuous positive airway pressure adherence and difficulty in achieving weight loss.
RATIONALE: Structural risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in adolescents have not been well characterized. Because many adolescents with OSAS are obese, we hypothesized that the anatomic OSAS risk factors would be more similar to those in adults than those in children. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the anatomic risk factors in adolescents with OSAS compared with obese and lean control subjects using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Three groups of adolescents (age range: 12-16 yr) underwent MRI: obese individuals with OSAS (n = 49), obese control subjects (n = 38), and lean control subjects (n = 50). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We studied 137 subjects and found that (1) obese adolescents with OSAS had increased adenotonsillar tissue compared with obese and lean control subjects; (2) obese OSAS adolescents had a smaller nasopharyngeal airway than control subjects; (3) the size of other upper airway soft tissue structures (volume of the tongue, parapharyngeal fat pads, lateral walls, and soft palate) was similar between subjects with OSAS and obese control subjects; (4) although there were no major craniofacial abnormalities in most of the adolescents with OSAS, the ratio of soft tissue to craniofacial space surrounding the airway was increased; and (5) there were sex differences in the pattern of lymphoid proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased size of the pharyngeal lymphoid tissue, rather than enlargement of the upper airway soft tissue structures, is the primary anatomic risk factor for OSAS in obese adolescents. These results are important for clinical decision making and suggest that adenotonsillectomy should be considered as the initial treatment for OSAS in obese adolescents, a group that has poor continuous positive airway pressure adherence and difficulty in achieving weight loss.
Authors: R Arens; J M McDonough; A T Costarino; S Mahboubi; C E Tayag-Kier; G Maislin; R J Schwab; A I Pack Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Manisha B Witmans; Thomas G Keens; Sally L Davidson Ward; Carole L Marcus Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: L Chi; F-L Comyn; N Mitra; M P Reilly; F Wan; G Maislin; L Chmiewski; M D Thorne-FitzGerald; U N Victor; A I Pack; R J Schwab Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Atul Malhotra; Yaqi Huang; Robert B Fogel; Giora Pillar; Jill K Edwards; Ron Kikinis; Stephen H Loring; David P White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: A Sánchez-Armengol; M A Fuentes-Pradera; F Capote-Gil; E García-Díaz; S Cano-Gómez; C Carmona-Bernal; J Castillo-Gómez Journal: Chest Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Richard J Schwab; Michael Pasirstein; Robert Pierson; Adonna Mackley; Robert Hachadoorian; Raanan Arens; Greg Maislin; Allan I Pack Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-05-13 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Chun Ting Au; Kate Ching Ching Chan; Kin Hung Liu; Winnie Chiu Wing Chu; Yun Kwok Wing; Albert Martin Li Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Christopher M Cielo; Kelly A Duffy; Aesha Vyas; Jesse A Taylor; Jennifer M Kalish Journal: Paediatr Respir Rev Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 2.726