Shinichiro Nakamura1, Adrija Sharma2, Kenji Nakamura3, Noboru Ikeda3, Jun Kawai3, Sumesh M Zingde2, Richard D Komistek2. 1. Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. Electronic address: shnk@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. 2. Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tamatsukuri-Koseinenkin Hospital, Matsue, Shimane, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tri-condylar implants containing a ball and socket third condyle as a post-cam mechanism were developed to accommodate a lifestyle requiring frequent deep flexion activities. The purpose of the current study was to examine the kinematic effects of the ball and socket third condyle during a deep knee bend activity, and to confirm the contact status of the ball and socket joint. METHODS: Seventeen knees implanted with tri-condylar implants were analyzed using a 3D to 2D registration approach. A distance of less than 1mm denoted ball and socket contact. Medial and lateral contact positions and axial rotation were compared before and after contact. Moreover, the contact position at the third condyle and the center of the ball joint were analyzed. RESULTS: After the third condyle contact, posterior translation of the medial and lateral contact positions increased considerably. Meanwhile, the angular rotation remained still. The center of the third condyle did not move after contact, and the contact position at the third condyle remained low. CONCLUSIONS: The third condyle induced intensive posterior translation of both condyles, and did not prevent axial rotation, which was proved to work properly as a posterior stabilizing post-cam mechanism.
BACKGROUND:Tri-condylar implants containing a ball and socket third condyle as a post-cam mechanism were developed to accommodate a lifestyle requiring frequent deep flexion activities. The purpose of the current study was to examine the kinematic effects of the ball and socket third condyle during a deep knee bend activity, and to confirm the contact status of the ball and socket joint. METHODS: Seventeen knees implanted with tri-condylar implants were analyzed using a 3D to 2D registration approach. A distance of less than 1mm denoted ball and socket contact. Medial and lateral contact positions and axial rotation were compared before and after contact. Moreover, the contact position at the third condyle and the center of the ball joint were analyzed. RESULTS: After the third condyle contact, posterior translation of the medial and lateral contact positions increased considerably. Meanwhile, the angular rotation remained still. The center of the third condyle did not move after contact, and the contact position at the third condyle remained low. CONCLUSIONS: The third condyle induced intensive posterior translation of both condyles, and did not prevent axial rotation, which was proved to work properly as a posterior stabilizing post-cam mechanism.
Authors: David H Dejour; Jacobus H Müller; Mo Saffarini; Michel Timoteo; Pierre Chambat; Gerard Deschamps; Michel P Bonnin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 4.342