Literature DB >> 25833840

Chromosomal meiotic segregation, embryonic developmental kinetics and DNA (hydroxy)methylation analysis consolidate the safety of human oocyte vitrification.

N De Munck1, L Petrussa2, G Verheyen3, C Staessen4, Y Vandeskelde4, J Sterckx3, G Bocken3, K Jacobs2, D Stoop3, M De Rycke5, H Van de Velde6.   

Abstract

Oocyte vitrification has been introduced into clinical settings without extensive pre-clinical safety testing. In this study, we analysed major safety aspects of human oocyte vitrification in a high security closed system: (i) chromosomal meiotic segregation, (ii) embryonic developmental kinetics and (iii) DNA (hydroxy)methylation status. Fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes from young donors after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were compared in three different assays. Firstly, the chromosomal constitution of the fertilized zygotes was deduced from array comparative genomic hybridization results obtained from both polar bodies biopsied at Day 1. Secondly, embryo development up to Day 3 was analysed by time-lapse imaging. Ten specific time points, six morphokinetic time intervals and the average cell number on Day 3 were recorded. Thirdly, global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation patterns were analysed by immunostaining on Day 3 embryos. The nuclear fluorescence intensity was measured by Volocity imaging software. Comprehensive chromosomal screening of the polar bodies demonstrated that at least half of the zygotes obtained after ICSI of fresh and vitrified oocytes were euploid. Time-lapse analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cleavage timings, the predictive morphokinetic time intervals nor the average cell number between embryos developed from fresh and vitrified oocytes. Finally, global DNA (hydroxy)methylation patterns were not significantly different between Day 3 embryos obtained from fresh and from vitrified oocytes. Our data further consolidate the safety of the oocyte vitrification technique. Nevertheless, additional testing in young and older sub-fertile/infertile patients and sound follow-up studies of children born after oocyte cryopreservation remain mandatory.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; PB biopsy; morphokinetics; oocyte; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25833840     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gav013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  12 in total

1.  [Causes of oocyte vitrification and its value in assisted reproductive technology].

Authors:  Jing Zhe; Jun Zhang; Shiling Chen; Weiqing Zhang; Chen Luo; Xingyu Zhou; Xin Chen; Zhuolin Qiu; Huixi Li; Xiaomin Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Diagnosis of abnormal human fertilization status based on pronuclear origin and/or centrosome number.

Authors:  Yoshiteru Kai; Kyoko Iwata; Yumiko Iba; Yasuyuki Mio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  In vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes recovered from ovariectomy specimens in the laboratory: a promising "ex vivo" method of oocyte cryopreservation resulting in the first report of an ongoing pregnancy in Europe.

Authors:  Ingrid Segers; Ileana Mateizel; Ellen Van Moer; Johan Smitz; Herman Tournaye; Greta Verheyen; Michel De Vos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  High survival of mouse oocytes using an optimized vitrification protocol.

Authors:  Cheng-Jie Zhou; Dong-Hui Wang; Xin-Xin Niu; Xiang-Wei Kong; Yan-Jiao Li; Jing Ren; Hong-Xia Zhou; Angeleem Lu; Yue-Fang Zhao; Cheng-Guang Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prediction model for aneuploidy in early human embryo development revealed by single-cell analysis.

Authors:  Maria Vera-Rodriguez; Shawn L Chavez; Carmen Rubio; Renee A Reijo Pera; Carlos Simon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  What impact does oocyte vitrification have on epigenetics and gene expression?

Authors:  Julie Barberet; Fatima Barry; Cécile Choux; Magali Guilleman; Sara Karoui; Raymond Simonot; Céline Bruno; Patricia Fauque
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 6.551

7.  Overexpression of Mitochondrial Genes (Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A and Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit 1) in Mouse Metaphase II Oocytes following Vitrification via Cryotop.

Authors:  Naeimeh Dehghani; Mehdi Dianatpour; Seyed Ebrahim Hosseini; Zahra Khodabandeh; Hamed Daneshpazhouh
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09

Review 8.  The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Michel De Vos; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19

10.  Stepped vitrification technique for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ellen Cristina Rivas Leonel; Ariadna Corral; Ramon Risco; Alessandra Camboni; Sebastião Roberto Taboga; Peter Kilbride; Marina Vazquez; John Morris; Marie-Madeleine Dolmans; Christiani A Amorim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.