Literature DB >> 25833754

[The German Acanthamoeba keratitis register: Initial results of a multicenter study].

L Daas1, N Szentmáry2, T Eppig3, A Langenbucher3, A Hasenfus4, M Roth5, M Saeger6, B Nölle6, B Lippmann7, D Böhringer7, T Reinhard7, C Kelbsch8, E Messmer9, U Pleyer10, S Roters11, A Zhivov12, K Engelmann13, J Schrecker14, L Zumhagen15, H Thieme16, R Darawsha17, T Meyer-Ter-Vehn18, B Dick19, I Görsch20, M Hermel21, M Kohlhaas22, B Seitz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In September 2011 the cornea section of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) established the first German Acanthamoeba keratitis registry. The data of this multicenter survey are being collected, compiled and evaluated at the Department of Ophthalmology at the Saarland University. The aim of this article is to present an intermediate report. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 172 eyes with Acanthamoeba keratitis were collected during the last 10 years. For this interim report we actually evaluated 121 eyes (60.2 % female patients, average age 41.3 years) and collected the following data: date of onset of symptoms, date and method of diagnosis, initial diagnosis, anamnestic data, clinical symptoms and signs at diagnosis and during follow-up, conservative and surgical therapy. Criteria for inclusion in the Acanthamoeba registry was the established diagnosis of an Acanthamoeba keratitis with at least one of the methods described in this article.
RESULTS: Acanthamoeba keratitis could be histologically proven in 55.3 % of the cases, via PCR in 25.6 %, with confocal microscopy in 20.4 % and using in vitro cultivation in 15.5 %. Clinical symptoms and signs in Acanthamoeba keratitis were pain in 67.0 %, ring infiltrates in 53.4 %, pseudodendritiform epitheliopathy in 11.7 % and keratoneuritis in 5.8 %. In 47.6 % of the cases the initial diagnosis was herpes simplex virus keratitis followed by bacterial keratitis in 25.2 % and fungal keratitis in 3.9 %. Acanthamoeba keratitis was the correct initial diagnosis in only 23.2 % of cases. The average time period between first symptoms and diagnosis was 2.8 ± 4.0 months (range 0-23 months). A triple therapy with Brolene® Lavasept® and antibiotic eye drops at least 5 ×/day was used in 54.5 % of eyes (n = 66). Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 40.4 %, in 18 cases in combination with cryotherapy of the cornea. The mean graft diameter was 7.9 ± 1.1 mm (range 3.5-11.0 mm). The final visual acuity (Snellen visual acuity chart at 5 m) was comparable in the two groups of eyes with (5/40 ± 5/25) and without (5/32 ± 5/25) keratoplasty.
CONCLUSION: Acanthamoeba keratitis is a rare and often very late diagnosed disease and two thirds of the cases were initially misdiagnosed. The early recognition of the typical symptoms is crucial for the prognosis of the disease. All ophthalmological departments in Germany are invited to submit further data of all confirmed cases (berthold.seitz@uks.eu), whether retrospectively or prospectively in order to generate an adequate standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach for this potentially devastating disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Multicenter study; Prognosis; Symptoms; Therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25833754     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-014-3225-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  46 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical aspects and therapy of acanthamoeba keratitis].

Authors:  T Reinhard; R Sundmacher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health.

Authors:  Naveed Ahmed Khan
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 3.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009.

Authors:  John K G Dart; Valerie P J Saw; Simon Kilvington
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: a comprehensive photographic reference of common and uncommon signs.

Authors:  Dipika V Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Outbreak of keratitis presumed to be caused by Acanthamoeba.

Authors:  W D Mathers; J E Sutphin; R Folberg; P A Meier; R P Wenzel; R G Elgin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Clear graft survival and immune reactions following emergency keratoplasty.

Authors:  P Maier; D Böhringer; T Reinhard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  A review of 72 consecutive cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis, 1984-1992.

Authors:  A S Bacon; D G Frazer; J K Dart; M Matheson; L A Ficker; P Wright
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  [Therapy of advanced amoeba keratitis with keratoplasty à chaud and adjuvant cryotherapy].

Authors:  M Klüppel; T Reinhard; R Sundmacher; B Daicker
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 9.  Use of corticosteroids in combination with antimicrobial drugs in the treatment of infectious corneal disease.

Authors:  G A Stern; M Buttross
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea.

Authors:  Govinda S Visvesvara; Hercules Moura; Frederick L Schuster
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  [Corneal wound healing-Pathophysiology and principles].

Authors:  Tobias Brockmann; Marcus Walckling; Claudia Brockmann; Tho Mas A Fuchsluger; Uwe Pleyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Contact lens complications : Diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  Gudrun Bischoff; Dorothea Kuhn
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Good outcome in Acanthamoeba keratitis].

Authors:  S Reichart-Peter; K Manousaridis; H Dirschmid; S Mennel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Reactive uveitis, retinal vasculitis and scleritis as ocular end-stage of Acanthamoeba keratitis: a histological study.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Tobias Hager; Fabian Norbert Fries; Loay Daas; Leonard Holbach; Carmen Hofmann-Rummelt; Elena Zemova; Berthold Seitz; Nóra Szentmáry
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  [Confocal microscopy for the diagnostics of fungal keratitis].

Authors:  L Daas; A Viestenz; M Bischoff; A Hasenfus; B Seitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Detection and Identification of Acanthamoeba and Other Nonviral Causes of Infectious Keratitis in Corneal Scrapings by Real-Time PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing-Based 16S-18S Gene Analysis.

Authors:  Dennis Back Holmgaard; Celine Barnadas; Seyed Hossein Mirbarati; Lee O'Brien Andersen; Henrik Vedel Nielsen; Christen Rune Stensvold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Acanthamoeba keratitis - Clinical signs, differential diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Nóra Szentmáry; Loay Daas; Lei Shi; Kornelia Lenke Laurik; Sabine Lepper; Georgia Milioti; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-19

8.  The Effect of Anti-Amoebic Agents and Ce6-PDT on Acanthamoeba castellanii Trophozoites and Cysts, In Vitro.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Vithusan Muthukumar; Tanja Stachon; Lorenz Latta; Mohamed Ibrahem Elhawy; Gubesh Gunaratnam; Erika Orosz; Berthold Seitz; Albrecht F Kiderlen; Markus Bischoff; Nóra Szentmáry
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Atypical presentation of acanthamoeba keratitis resembling central toxic keratopathy.

Authors:  Mathew S Ward; Jordan P Hastings; Kathryn M Shmunes; Yasmyne Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.