Literature DB >> 25833639

Photostability and breakdown products of pigments currently used in tattoo inks.

Urs Hauri1, Christopher Hohl.   

Abstract

Tattoos fade with time. Part of this fading can be attributed to the photodegradation of pigments. When people get tired of their tattoos, removal by laser irradiation is the method of choice. In vivo laser irradiation of tattoos on mice has shown that the degradation of pigments can result in toxic compounds. Various in vitro studies on photodegradation by sunlight or laser have shown similar degradation products for both irradiations. Even visible light was shown to be able to decompose some pigments to toxic degradation products in vitro. Whereas the investigated phthalocyanins (C.I. 74160, 74260), quinacridones (C.I. 73915) or dioxazines (C.I. 51319) were fairly photostable in vitro, all azo pigments exposed to sunlight or laser were degraded into a variety of products, some of which were toxic or even carcinogenic, such as 2-amino-4-nitrotoluene, 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine and o-toluidine. Up to now, the absence of specific toxicological data is the reason why legal restrictions for tattoo inks are derived from those for cosmetics, toys and textiles. Photodegradation has not been considered. In light of the present analytical findings, even with their possible shortcomings, the evidence weighs heavily enough to consider banning azo pigments containing carcinogenic aromatic amines or allergens in their structure from use in tattoo inks.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25833639     DOI: 10.1159/000369225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Probl Dermatol        ISSN: 1421-5721


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current knowledge of the degradation products of tattoo pigments by sunlight, laser irradiation and metabolism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tristan R Fraser; Kirstin E Ross; Ula Alexander; Claire E Lenehan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Laser vs. thermal treatments of green pigment PG36: coincidence and toxicity of processes.

Authors:  Elvira Maria Bauer; Daniele Cecchetti; Ettore Guerriero; Steven Nisticò; Giulia Germinario; Simona Sennato; Lorenzo Gontrani; Pietro Tagliatesta; Marilena Carbone
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Identification of organic pigments in tattoo inks and permanent make-ups using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Markus Niederer; Urs Hauri; Lydia Kroll; Christopher Hohl
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-11-21

4.  TatS: a novel in vitro tattooed human skin model for improved pigment toxicology research.

Authors:  Henrik Hering; Christian Zoschke; Markus Kühn; Ashish K Gadicherla; Günther Weindl; Andreas Luch; Ines Schreiver
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Cutaneous Malignancies in Tattoos, a Case Series of Six Patients.

Authors:  Marike Leijs; Hannah Schaefer; Albert Rübben; Claudio Cacchi; Thomas Rustemeyer; Sebastiaan van der Bent
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Identification and hazard prediction of tattoo pigments by means of pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ines Schreiver; Christoph Hutzler; Sarah Andree; Peter Laux; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Atypical Intraepidermal Melanocytic Proliferation Masked by a Tattoo: Implications for Tattoo Artists and Public Health Campaigns.

Authors:  Kristina Navrazhina; Barry Goldman; Marie C Leger
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-13

8.  Identification of pigments related to allergic tattoo reactions in 104 human skin biopsies.

Authors:  Jørgen Serup; Katrina Hutton Carlsen; Nils Dommershausen; Mitra Sepehri; Bernhard Hesse; Christian Seim; Andreas Luch; Ines Schreiver
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.