Thomas P Meehan1, Daniel J Qazi2, Thomas J Van Hoof3, Shih-Yieh Ho2, Sheila Eckenrode2, Ann Spenard2, Michelle Pandolfi2, Florence Johnson2, Deborah Quetti2. 1. Qualidigm, Wethersfield, CT; Department of Health Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, North Haven, CT. Electronic address: tmeehan@qualidigm.org. 2. Qualidigm, Wethersfield, CT. 3. Qualidigm, Wethersfield, CT; University of Connecticut School of Nursing, Storrs, CT; Department of Community Medicine and Healthcare, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the impact of quality improvement (QI) support provided to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) by a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO). DESIGN: Retrospective, mixed-method, process evaluation of a QI project intended to decrease preventable hospital readmissions from SNFs. SETTING: Five SNFs in Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: SNF Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Assistant Directors of Nursing, Admissions Coordinators, Registered Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, Receptionists, QIO Quality Improvement Consultant. INTERVENTION: QIO staff provided training and technical assistance to SNF administrative and clinical staff to establish or enhance QI infrastructure and implement an established set of QI tools [Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) tools]. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline SNF demographic, staffing, and hospital readmission data; baseline and follow-up SNF QI structure (QI Committee), processes (general and use of INTERACT tools), and outcome (30-day all-cause hospital readmission rates); details of QIO-provided training and technical assistance; QIO-perceived barriers to quality improvement; SNF leadership-perceived barriers, accomplishments, and suggestions for improvement of QIO support. RESULTS: Success occurred in establishing QI Committees and targeting preventable hospital readmissions, as well as implementing INTERACT tools in all SNFs; however, hospital readmission rates decreased in only 2 facilities. QIO staff and SNF leaders noted the ongoing challenge of engaging already busy SNF staff and leadership in QI activities. SNF leaders reported that they appreciated the training and technical assistance that their institutions received, although most noted that additional support was needed to bring about improvement in readmission rates. CONCLUSION: This process evaluation documented mixed clinical results but successfully identified opportunities to improve recruitment of and provision of technical support to participating SNFs. Recommendations are offered for others who wish to conduct similar projects.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the impact of quality improvement (QI) support provided to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) by a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO). DESIGN: Retrospective, mixed-method, process evaluation of a QI project intended to decrease preventable hospital readmissions from SNFs. SETTING: Five SNFs in Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: SNF Administrators, Directors of Nursing, Assistant Directors of Nursing, Admissions Coordinators, Registered Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, Receptionists, QIO Quality Improvement Consultant. INTERVENTION: QIO staff provided training and technical assistance to SNF administrative and clinical staff to establish or enhance QI infrastructure and implement an established set of QI tools [Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) tools]. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline SNF demographic, staffing, and hospital readmission data; baseline and follow-up SNF QI structure (QI Committee), processes (general and use of INTERACT tools), and outcome (30-day all-cause hospital readmission rates); details of QIO-provided training and technical assistance; QIO-perceived barriers to quality improvement; SNF leadership-perceived barriers, accomplishments, and suggestions for improvement of QIO support. RESULTS: Success occurred in establishing QI Committees and targeting preventable hospital readmissions, as well as implementing INTERACT tools in all SNFs; however, hospital readmission rates decreased in only 2 facilities. QIO staff and SNF leaders noted the ongoing challenge of engaging already busy SNF staff and leadership in QI activities. SNF leaders reported that they appreciated the training and technical assistance that their institutions received, although most noted that additional support was needed to bring about improvement in readmission rates. CONCLUSION: This process evaluation documented mixed clinical results but successfully identified opportunities to improve recruitment of and provision of technical support to participating SNFs. Recommendations are offered for others who wish to conduct similar projects.
Authors: Peter J Huckfeldt; Robert L Kane; Zhiyou Yang; Gabriella Engstrom; Ruth Tappen; Carolina Rojido; David Newman; Bernardo Reyes; Joseph G Ouslander Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael Mileski; Joseph Baar Topinka; Kimberly Lee; Matthew Brooks; Christopher McNeil; Jenna Jackson Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Mallika L Mendu; Constantinos I Michaelidis; Michele C Chu; Jasdeep Sahota; Lauren Hauser; Emily Fay; Aimee Smith; Mary Ann Huether; John Dobija; Mark Yurkofsky; Charles T Pu; Kathryn Britton Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2018-07-25
Authors: Emma Coles; Julie Anderson; Margaret Maxwell; Fiona M Harris; Nicola M Gray; Gill Milner; Stephen MacGillivray Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-04-26