Literature DB >> 25832893

How to implement quality indicators successfully in palliative care services: perceptions of team members about facilitators of and barriers to implementation.

Kathleen Leemans1, Lieve Van den Block2,3, Robert Vander Stichele2,4, Anneke L Francke5,6, Luc Deliens2,5, Joachim Cohen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is an increasing demand for the use of quality indicators in palliative care. With previous research about implementation in this field lacking, we aimed to evaluate the barriers to and facilitators of implementation.
METHODS: Three focus group interviews were organized with 21 caregivers from 18 different specialized palliative care services in Belgium. Four had already worked with the indicators during a pilot study. The focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the thematic framework approach.
RESULTS: The caregivers anticipated that a positive attitude by the team towards quality improvement, the presence of a good leader, and the possible link between quality indicators and reimbursement might facilitate the implementation of quality indicators in specialized palliative care services. Other facilitators concerned the presence of a need to demonstrate quality of care, to perform improvement actions, and to learn from other caregivers and services in the field. A negative attitude by caregivers towards quality measurement and a lack of skills, time, and staff were mentioned as barriers to successful implementation.
CONCLUSION: Palliative caregivers anticipate a number of opportunities and problems when implementing quality indicators. These relate to the attitudes of the team regarding quality measurement; the attitudes, knowledge, and skills of the individual caregivers within the team; and the organizational context and the economic and political context. Training in the advantages of quality indicators and how to use them is indispensable, as are structural changes in the policy concerning palliative care, in order to progress towards systematic quality monitoring.

Keywords:  Disincentives; Incentives; Palliative care; Qualitative research; Quality assessment; Quality improvement; Quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832893     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2687-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  32 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators.

Authors:  P G Shekelle; C H MacLean; S C Morton; N S Wenger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Development of a theoretical model for tracing facilitators and barriers in adaptive implementation of innovative practices in dementia care.

Authors:  F J M Meiland; R M Dröes; J De Lange; M J F J Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl       Date:  2004

4.  Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers.

Authors:  Franka J M Meiland; Rose-Marie Dröes; Jacomine de Lange; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Progress towards systems of quality measurement that capture the essence of good palliative care.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Dale Lupu; Hsien Seow
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 6.  Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Bárbara Antunes; Richard Harding; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 7.  Quality indicators for palliative care: update of a systematic review.

Authors:  Maaike L De Roo; Kathleen Leemans; Susanne J J Claessen; Joachim Cohen; H Roeline W Pasman; Luc Deliens; Anneke L Francke
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC)--measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis.

Authors:  Kathy Eagar; Prue Watters; David C Currow; Samar M Aoun; Patsy Yates
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Robin Urquhart; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Amy Folkes; Grace Johnston; Frederick I Burge; Craig C Earle; Susan Dent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karl A Lorenz; Joanne Lynn; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne Wilkinson; Richard A Mularski; Sally C Morton; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Virginia C Sun; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Measuring and Improving Quality in Palliative Care Survey.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Ritu Sharma; Kamini Kuchinad; Zi-Rou Liew; Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Susan M Hannum; Junya Zhu; Arif H Kamal; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Sarina R Isenberg
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement: Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Susan M Hannum; Ritu Sharma; Sarina R Isenberg; Kamini Kuchinad; Junya Zhu; Katherine Smith; Karl A Lorenz; Arif H Kamal; Anne M Walling; Sallie J Weaver
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.

Authors:  David Wright; John Gabbay; Andrée Le May
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 7.418

4.  A systematic review and critical appraisal of quality indicators to assess optimal palliative care for older people with dementia.

Authors:  Sarah Amador; Elizabeth L Sampson; Claire Goodman; Louise Robinson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Pilot Study to Develop and Test Palliative Care Quality Indicators for Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Charlèss Dupont; Robrecht De Schreye; Joachim Cohen; Mark De Ridder; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens; Kathleen Leemans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Informing the implementation and use of person-centred quality indicators: a mixed methods study on the readiness, barriers and facilitators to implementation in Canada.

Authors:  Kimberly Manalili; Catherine M Scott; Maeve O'Beirne; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Maria-Jose Santana
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Quality indicators for Palliative Day Services: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Noleen K McCorry; Sean O'Connor; Kathleen Leemans; Joanna Coast; Michael Donnelly; Anne Finucane; Louise Jones; W George Kernohan; Paul Perkins; Martin Dempster
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.762

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.