Kathleen Leemans1, Lieve Van den Block2,3, Robert Vander Stichele2,4, Anneke L Francke5,6, Luc Deliens2,5, Joachim Cohen2. 1. End-of-Life Care Research Group Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. kleemans@vub.ac.be. 2. End-of-Life Care Research Group Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium. 4. Heymans Insitute, Department of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 5. Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. NIVEL. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is an increasing demand for the use of quality indicators in palliative care. With previous research about implementation in this field lacking, we aimed to evaluate the barriers to and facilitators of implementation. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were organized with 21 caregivers from 18 different specialized palliative care services in Belgium. Four had already worked with the indicators during a pilot study. The focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the thematic framework approach. RESULTS: The caregivers anticipated that a positive attitude by the team towards quality improvement, the presence of a good leader, and the possible link between quality indicators and reimbursement might facilitate the implementation of quality indicators in specialized palliative care services. Other facilitators concerned the presence of a need to demonstrate quality of care, to perform improvement actions, and to learn from other caregivers and services in the field. A negative attitude by caregivers towards quality measurement and a lack of skills, time, and staff were mentioned as barriers to successful implementation. CONCLUSION: Palliative caregivers anticipate a number of opportunities and problems when implementing quality indicators. These relate to the attitudes of the team regarding quality measurement; the attitudes, knowledge, and skills of the individual caregivers within the team; and the organizational context and the economic and political context. Training in the advantages of quality indicators and how to use them is indispensable, as are structural changes in the policy concerning palliative care, in order to progress towards systematic quality monitoring.
PURPOSE: There is an increasing demand for the use of quality indicators in palliative care. With previous research about implementation in this field lacking, we aimed to evaluate the barriers to and facilitators of implementation. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were organized with 21 caregivers from 18 different specialized palliative care services in Belgium. Four had already worked with the indicators during a pilot study. The focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the thematic framework approach. RESULTS: The caregivers anticipated that a positive attitude by the team towards quality improvement, the presence of a good leader, and the possible link between quality indicators and reimbursement might facilitate the implementation of quality indicators in specialized palliative care services. Other facilitators concerned the presence of a need to demonstrate quality of care, to perform improvement actions, and to learn from other caregivers and services in the field. A negative attitude by caregivers towards quality measurement and a lack of skills, time, and staff were mentioned as barriers to successful implementation. CONCLUSION: Palliative caregivers anticipate a number of opportunities and problems when implementing quality indicators. These relate to the attitudes of the team regarding quality measurement; the attitudes, knowledge, and skills of the individual caregivers within the team; and the organizational context and the economic and political context. Training in the advantages of quality indicators and how to use them is indispensable, as are structural changes in the policy concerning palliative care, in order to progress towards systematic quality monitoring.
Authors: Eva Grunfeld; Robin Urquhart; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Amy Folkes; Grace Johnston; Frederick I Burge; Craig C Earle; Susan Dent Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Karl A Lorenz; Joanne Lynn; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne Wilkinson; Richard A Mularski; Sally C Morton; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Virginia C Sun; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sydney M Dy; Ritu Sharma; Kamini Kuchinad; Zi-Rou Liew; Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Susan M Hannum; Junya Zhu; Arif H Kamal; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Sarina R Isenberg Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Sydney M Dy; Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Susan M Hannum; Ritu Sharma; Sarina R Isenberg; Kamini Kuchinad; Junya Zhu; Katherine Smith; Karl A Lorenz; Arif H Kamal; Anne M Walling; Sallie J Weaver Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Charlèss Dupont; Robrecht De Schreye; Joachim Cohen; Mark De Ridder; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens; Kathleen Leemans Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Noleen K McCorry; Sean O'Connor; Kathleen Leemans; Joanna Coast; Michael Donnelly; Anne Finucane; Louise Jones; W George Kernohan; Paul Perkins; Martin Dempster Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 4.762