Literature DB >> 25832865

Identifications of genetic differences between metastatic and non-metastatic osteosarcoma samples based on bioinformatics analysis.

Baoyong Sun1, Fangxin Wang, Min Li, Mingshan Yang.   

Abstract

To investigate the differences in gene expression level between metastatic and non-metastatic osteosarcoma (OS) samples and the potential mechanism. Gene expression profile data GSE9508 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between metastatic, non-metastatic OS samples, and normal control samples via SAM method. Function expression matrix of the DEGs was constructed by calculating the functional node scores based on the genes sets collected from the pathways recorded in MsigDB database. Next, t test was applied to screen the differentially expressed functional nodes between each two kinds of samples. Finally, we compared the significant genes between selected DEGs and genes in differentially expressed functional nodes. There were 79 up-regulated DEGs between non-metastatic OS and normal samples, 380 up-regulated and 134 down-regulated DEGs between the metastatic OS and normal samples, and 761 up-regulated plus 186 down-regulated DEGs between metastatic and non-metastatic OS samples. A total of 3846 functional gene sets were collected to form the function expression profile matrix. The numbers of differentially expressed functional nodes between non-metastatic OS and normal samples, metastatic OS and normal samples, and metastatic and non-metastatic OS samples were 8, 39, and 5, respectively. The gene level difference between metastatic and non-metastatic OS samples can be distinguished using bioinformatics analysis. TGFB1, LFT3, KDM1A, and KRAS genes have the potential to be used as biomarkers for OS; however, further analysis is needed to verify the current results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25832865     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-015-0604-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  24 in total

1.  Prediction of mechanisms of action of antibacterial compounds by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Bernd Hutter; Christoph Schaab; Sebastian Albrecht; Matthias Borgmann; Nina A Brunner; Christoph Freiberg; Karl Ziegelbauer; Charles O Rock; Igor Ivanov; Hannes Loferer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Arsenic trioxide inhibits Ewing's sarcoma cell invasiveness by targeting p38(MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Wei Guo; Ting-Ting Ren; Xin-Chang Lu; Guo-Qing Tang; Fu-Long Zhao
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  Gene expression module discovery using gibbs sampling.

Authors:  Chang-Jiun Wu; Yutao Fu; T M Murali; Simon Kasif
Journal:  Genome Inform       Date:  2004

4.  Ectopic expression of Flt3 kinase inhibits proliferation and promotes cell death in different human cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Eystein Oveland; Line Wergeland; Randi Hovland; James B Lorens; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; Kari E Fladmark
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.691

5.  Childhood cancer survival trends in Europe: a EUROCARE Working Group study.

Authors:  Gemma Gatta; Riccardo Capocaccia; Charles Stiller; Peter Kaatsch; Franco Berrino; Monica Terenziani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Gene expression profiling identifies molecular subtypes of inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Jacques Rougemont; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Nathalie Cervera; Carole Tarpin; Catherine Nguyen; Luc Xerri; Rémi Houlgatte; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Patrice Viens; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Isoprenylcysteine carboxylmethyltransferase deficiency exacerbates KRAS-driven pancreatic neoplasia via Notch suppression.

Authors:  Helen Court; Marc Amoyel; Michael Hackman; Kyoung Eun Lee; Ruliang Xu; George Miller; Dafna Bar-Sagi; Erika A Bach; Martin O Bergö; Mark R Philips
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Transforming growth factor β1 signal is crucial for dedifferentiation of cancer cells to cancer stem cells in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Haixia Zhang; Haotong Wu; Junheng Zheng; Pei Yu; Lixiao Xu; Pan Jiang; Jin Gao; Hua Wang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  High grade osteosarcoma of the extremities with lung metastases at presentation: treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and simultaneous resection of primary and metastatic lesions.

Authors:  Gaetano Bacci; Michele Rocca; Mariacristina Salone; Alba Balladelli; Stefano Ferrari; Emanuela Palmerini; Cristiana Forni; Antonio Briccoli
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Towards mechanism classifiers: expression-anchored Gene Ontology signature predicts clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Xinan Yang; Haiquan Li; Kelly Regan; Jianrong Li; Yong Huang; Yves A Lussier
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification of potential crucial genes and key pathways in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Junwei Liu; Siyu Wu; Xiaoyu Xie; Ziming Wang; Qianqian Lei
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  miR‑193b exhibits mutual interaction with MYC, and suppresses growth and metastasis of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jinjian Gao; Sai Ma; Fan Yang; Xu Chen; Wei Wang; Jianping Zhang; Yufang Li; Tao Wang; Lequn Shan
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.906

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.