Literature DB >> 25831521

Sexual selection drives evolution and rapid turnover of male gene expression.

Peter W Harrison1, Alison E Wright2, Fabian Zimmer2, Rebecca Dean2, Stephen H Montgomery2, Marie A Pointer2, Judith E Mank2.   

Abstract

The profound and pervasive differences in gene expression observed between males and females, and the unique evolutionary properties of these genes in many species, have led to the widespread assumption that they are the product of sexual selection and sexual conflict. However, we still lack a clear understanding of the connection between sexual selection and transcriptional dimorphism, often termed sex-biased gene expression. Moreover, the relative contribution of sexual selection vs. drift in shaping broad patterns of expression, divergence, and polymorphism remains unknown. To assess the role of sexual selection in shaping these patterns, we assembled transcriptomes from an avian clade representing the full range of sexual dimorphism and sexual selection. We use these species to test the links between sexual selection and sex-biased gene expression evolution in a comparative framework. Through ancestral reconstruction of sex bias, we demonstrate a rapid turnover of sex bias across this clade driven by sexual selection and show it to be primarily the result of expression changes in males. We use phylogenetically controlled comparative methods to demonstrate that phenotypic measures of sexual selection predict the proportion of male-biased but not female-biased gene expression. Although male-biased genes show elevated rates of coding sequence evolution, consistent with previous reports in a range of taxa, there is no association between sexual selection and rates of coding sequence evolution, suggesting that expression changes may be more important than coding sequence in sexual selection. Taken together, our results highlight the power of sexual selection to act on gene expression differences and shape genome evolution.

Keywords:  gene expression evolution; sex-biased gene expression; sexual conflict; sexual dimorphism; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25831521      PMCID: PMC4394296          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501339112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

Review 1.  Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Sex-linkage of sexually antagonistic genes is predicted by female, but not male, effects in birds.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Effective population size and the Faster-X effect: empirical results and their interpretation.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Beatriz Vicoso; Sofia Berlin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Mammalian sperm proteins are rapidly evolving: evidence of positive selection in functionally diverse genes.

Authors:  Dara G Torgerson; Rob J Kulathinal; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history.

Authors:  Jason M Kamilar; Natalie Cooper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Reduced selection and accumulation of deleterious mutations in genes exclusively expressed in men.

Authors:  Moran Gershoni; Shmuel Pietrokovski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Are all sex chromosomes created equal?

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Mark Kirkpatrick; Judith E Mank; Stuart F McDaniel; J Chris Pires; William Rice; Nicole Valenzuela
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Maternal expression relaxes constraint on innovation of the anterior determinant, bicoid.

Authors:  Michael S Barker; Jeffery P Demuth; Michael J Wade
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Masculinization of gene expression is associated with exaggeration of male sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Marie A Pointer; Peter W Harrison; Alison E Wright; Judith E Mank
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  74 in total

1.  Conservation of Regional Variation in Sex-Specific Sex Chromosome Regulation.

Authors:  Alison E Wright; Fabian Zimmer; Peter W Harrison; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid Evolution of Ovarian-Biased Genes in the Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti).

Authors:  Carrie A Whittle; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Release from intralocus sexual conflict? Evolved loss of a male sexual trait demasculinizes female gene expression.

Authors:  Jack G Rayner; Sonia Pascoal; Nathan W Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The Old and the New: Discovery Proteomics Identifies Putative Novel Seminal Fluid Proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  Timothy L Karr; Helen Southern; Matthew A Rosenow; Toni I Gossmann; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 5.  Misregulation of Gene Expression and Sterility in Interspecies Hybrids: Causal Links and Alternative Hypotheses.

Authors:  Alberto Civetta
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  The Drosophila seminal proteome and its role in postcopulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Stuart Wigby; Nora C Brown; Sarah E Allen; Snigdha Misra; Jessica L Sitnik; Irem Sepil; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Thomas C Nelson; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 8.  Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  The genomic footprint of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayadi; Alvaro Martinez Barrio; Elina Immonen; Jacques Dainat; David Berger; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Björn Nystedt; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Sexual dimorphism and rapid turnover in gene expression in pre-reproductive seedlings of a dioecious herb.

Authors:  Guillaume G Cossard; Melissa A Toups; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.