An enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine for the prevention of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HMFD) is available, but it is not known whether the EV71 vaccine cross-protects against Coxsackievirus (CV) infection. Furthermore, although an inactivated circulating CVA16 Changchun 024 (CC024) strain vaccine candidate is effective in newborn mice, the CC024 strain causes severe lesions in muscle and lung tissues. Therefore, an effective CV vaccine with improved pathogenic safety is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo safety and in vitro replication capability of a noncirculating CVA16 SHZH05 strain. The replication capacity of circulating CVA16 strains CC024, CC045, CC090 and CC163 and the noncirculating SHZH05 strain was evaluated by cytopathic effect in different cell lines. The replication capacity and pathogenicity of the CC024 and SHZH05 strains were also evaluated in a neonatal mouse model. Histopathological and viral load analyses demonstrated that the SHZH05 strain had an in vitro replication capacity comparable to the four CC strains. The CC024, but not the SHZH05 strain, became distributed in a variety of tissues and caused severe lesions and mortality in neonatal mice. The differences in replication capacity and in vivo pathogenicity of the CC024 and SHZH05 strains may result from differences in the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of viral functional polyproteins P1, P2 and P3. Our findings suggest that the noncirculating SHZH05 strain may be a safer CV vaccine candidate than the CC024 strain.
An enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine for the prevention of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HMFD) is available, but it is not known whether the EV71 vaccine cross-protects against Coxsackievirus (CV) infection. Furthermore, although an inactivated circulating CVA16 Changchun 024 (CC024) strain vaccine candidate is effective in newborn mice, the CC024 strain causes severe lesions in muscle and lung tissues. Therefore, an effective CV vaccine with improved pathogenic safety is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo safety and in vitro replication capability of a noncirculating CVA16 SHZH05 strain. The replication capacity of circulating CVA16 strains CC024, CC045, CC090 and CC163 and the noncirculating SHZH05 strain was evaluated by cytopathic effect in different cell lines. The replication capacity and pathogenicity of the CC024 and SHZH05 strains were also evaluated in a neonatal mouse model. Histopathological and viral load analyses demonstrated that the SHZH05 strain had an in vitro replication capacity comparable to the four CC strains. The CC024, but not the SHZH05 strain, became distributed in a variety of tissues and caused severe lesions and mortality in neonatal mice. The differences in replication capacity and in vivo pathogenicity of the CC024 and SHZH05 strains may result from differences in the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of viral functional polyproteins P1, P2 and P3. Our findings suggest that the noncirculating SHZH05 strain may be a safer CV vaccine candidate than the CC024 strain.
Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) mainly affects infants and children, and
occasionally occurs in adults worldwide. Several major outbreaks have occurred in
Southeast Asia in recent decades (1).
Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) and enterovirus 71 (EV71), members of the genus
Enterovirus and family Picornaviridae, have been
identified as the first and second most frequent causes of HFMD, respectively (2). CVA16 infections can lead to severe
complications, such as aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, lethal myocarditis, and
pneumonia (3-6). Coinfection with CVA16 and EV71 increases genetic recombination between
the two viruses, making control of HFMD epidemics even more complex and difficult (7). Such a coinfection may have been responsible for
an HFMD outbreak in Fuyang, Anhui Province, China in 2008 (1).Currently, no antiviral treatment is available for HFMD infection; however, a recently
developed EV71 vaccine was consistently immunogenic and provided protection against
mild-to-severe disease in a phase III trial (8).
An effective vaccine against HFMD should protect against both EV71 and CV infection, but
it is not known whether the EV71 vaccine is cross-protective. Maternal vaccination with
an inactivated CVA16 Changchun 024 (CC024) strain (a circulating strain that is epidemic
in the Changchun city region of China) protected neonatal mice from a series of CVA16
strain challenges. However, the CC024 strain caused severe lesions in the muscle and
lung tissues of the newborn mice (9). Therefore,
a CV candidate vaccine that protects against HFMD infection and is both effective and
pathogenically safe is needed.In 2010, multiple circulating CVA16 CC strains were isolated from hospitalized patients
with HFMD in Jilin Province of Changchun (9,10). A CVA16 SHZH05 strain was also isolated from
the city of Shenzhen in Guangdong Province (11).
The SHZH05 strain is considered to be a noncirculating CVA16 strain because it shares
the same recombination pattern and forms a close cluster with the CVA16 circulating CC
strains, but is not closely related to the prototype CVA16 G10 (10,12). It is not known why
infection with only some CVA16 strains results in neurological complications and even
death. It is also unclear whether the CVA16 circulating and noncirculating strains
differ in replication capacity and pathogenesis. In this study, we aimed to determine
whether the noncirculating SHZH05 strain is safe for newborn mice while maintaining a
replication capacity similar to that of the circulating CC strains in different cell
lines.
Material and Methods
Ethics statement
Approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee at the First Hospital
of Jilin University. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all
the children involved in the study. All animal protocols were approved by the Ethics
Committee of Jilin University Institute of Animal Care and Use. All specimens were
confirmed to be positive for the CVA16 VP1 conserved region by a Coxsackievirus A16
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit (DAAN Gene Co., Ltd. of Sun Yat-Sen University,
China) (13).
Cells and viruses
The C6 cell line was a gift from the Tumor Center of First Hospital of Jilin
University, Chanagchun, China. Vero, baby hamster kidney (BHK), C6 and L929 cell
lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA) and
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco, Invitrogen, USA)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Invitrogen) at 37°C in an
atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The CVA16 strains CC024, CC045, CC090 and
CC163 that were isolated in 2010 from throat swabs of hospitalized HFMD patients in
Changchun were propagated in a Vero cell line. Viral samples were diluted in DMEM and
passed through a 0.22-µm filter before infection of Vero cells. Viruses were
harvested and continuously passaged until a cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed. The
SHZH05 strain (GenBank accession No. EU262658.1) was a gift from Professor Qi Jin of
the Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking
Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Isolation and primary neonatal mouse lung cell culture
Lung tissue of 1-day-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) neonatal ICR mice from the
Experimental Animal Center, College of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, was minced
and kept overnight in 2 mL of 0.25% trypsin-EDTA at 4°C. The suspension was diluted
in 2 mL of DMEM with 15% FBS and filtered through several layers of gauze to remove
tissue pieces. The suspension was then centrifuged at 200 g for 5
min to collect the cells, which were then resuspended in DMEM with 15% FBS in a cell
culture flask at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The
cells obtained from this primary culture were named ML-1.
Virus titration
Virus titers were expressed as the median tissue culture infectious dose
(TCID50) obtained by end-point dilution. Serially diluted viruses were
added to Vero cells grown in 96-well plates (n=8) that were incubated for 7 days at
35°C. The TCID50 values were measured by determining the CPE in infected
Vero cells and calculated by the Reed-Muench method.
In vitro infection
Monolayers of Vero, BHK, C6, L929, and ML-1 cells cultured in 24-well plates were
infected with the SHZH05, CC024, CC045, CC090 or CC163 strains or mock-infected with
DMEM media. The infected cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2
atmosphere for 96 h.
Neonatal mouse infection
One-day-old SPF ICR neonatal mice weighing 1.8-2.0 g were randomly allocated to 3
groups of 8-10 mice from single litters for infection with: a) 105.5
CCID50/mL CC024 strain, b) 105.5 CCID50/mL SHZH05
strain, or c) mock infection with DMEM. The neonatal mice were intracerebrally
inoculated with 20 μL of 10-fold serially diluted virus or mock inoculated with DMEM.
The severity of clinical disease was scored as: 0, healthy; 1, lethargy and
inactivity; 2, wasting; 3, limb-shaking weakness; 4, hind limb paralysis; 5, moribund
or dead. Body weight, activity, occurrence of limb paralysis, morbidity, and death
were monitored and recorded until 21 days post-infection. The median lethal dose
(LD50) was calculated by the Reed-Muench method.
Histopathological analysis
At 21 days post-infection, after disease severity scoring, samples of brain, lung,
spinal and hind-limb muscle, liver, kidney, spleen, heart, and intestine tissue were
examined. Tissue was obtained from a) 3 dead mice infected with 105.5
CCID50/mL CC024 strain, b) 3 mice infected with 105.5
CCID50/mL SHZH05 strain, and c) three mock-infectedmice. Tissue
samples were fixed in 10% formalin for 3-5 days, dehydrated through an ethanol
gradient, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 4 µm, and stained with hematoxylin and
eosin. Histopathological analysis was performed by light microscopy (CKX-31, Olympus,
Japan).
Viral loads in infected neonatal mouse tissue
Heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, intestine, spinal and hind-limb muscle
tissue and blood were collected from 3 mice in each group on days 2, 3, 4 and 5
post-infection. The tissue samples were weighed, homogenized in sterile phosphate
buffered saline, disrupted by freeze-thawing, and centrifuged at 7500
g for 10 min. All samples were treated with TRIZOL (Invitrogen)
for RNA extraction, and the viral load was determined by quantitative real-time
polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and expressed as log10 copies/mg
tissue or log10 copies/mL blood.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
For qRT-PCR, viral RNA was extracted from fresh tissue homogenates using TRIZOL
(Invitrogen), and cDNA was generated using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription
kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc., USA) and oligo-d(T)18 primers according to
the supplier's instructions. Primers designed according to the VP1 conserved region
sequences of CVA16 were: CVA16-F1, CATGCAGCGCTTGTGCTT; CVA16-F2, CATGCAACGACTGTGCTTTC; CVA16-R1, CACACAATTCCCCCGTCTTAC; and CVA16-R2,
CATAATTCGCCCGTTTTGCT. The SYBR
Green-based qRT-PCR was carried out on a Mx3005P machine (Agilent Technologies
Stratagene, USA) using the double-strand DNA-binding dye method with SYBR Green PCR
Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). Each 20 µL reaction mixture contained 10 µL of
SYBR Premix, 0.2 µL each of F1, R1, F2, and R2 (all 10 µM), 7.2 µL of
double-distilled H2O, and 2 µL of cDNA template. Cycling conditions were:
50°C for 2 min, then 95°C for 10 min, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C
for 1 min. The melting curve analysis was performed at 90°C for 1 min, then 55°C for
30 s, and 95°C for 30 s.The copy number of the target cDNA in the qRT-PCR was determined by a standard curve
of 10-fold serially diluted nonlinearized plasmid DNAs containing the target VP1
sequence (ranging from 102 to 109 copies). Absolute RNA copy numbers were calculated
by standard dilution curves of the plasmids containing the target sequence. The
sensitivity of the assay (i.e., limit of detection) was determined as the lowest copy
number that was amplified consistently within the linear portion of the standard
curve.
Gene sequence alignment
The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the circulating CC024 and noncirculating
SHZH05 strains were aligned using the DNAMAN software (Version 6.0, USA).
Statistical analysis
Data for the viral loads and clinical scores were compared using a nonparametric
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Survival rates were evaluated by a log-rank
test. Results are reported as means±SE. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant.
Results
Circulating CC and noncirculating SHZH05 strain replication in
vitro
Vero, BHK, C6, L929, and ML-1 cells were infected with one of the four CC strains or
with the SHZH05 strain at 105.5 CCID50/mL. The results
demonstrated that the SHZH05 strain and the CC024, CC045, CC090, and CC163 strains
induced similar CPEs in Vero and BHK cells at 96 h post-infection (Figure 1). However, no CPE was observed in C6,
L929 and ML-1 cells infected by any of the virus strains (Figure 1). The primary mouseML-1 cells were used as a control to
rule out possible resistance to CVA16 infection by immortalized cells and to test the
sensitivity of the ML-1 cells to CVA16.
Figure 1
Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) replication in vitro. Vero,
BHK, C6, L929, and neonatal mouse lung ML-1 cells were infected with the
circulating CVA16 Changchun (CC) CC024, CC045, CC090, or CC163 strains or the
noncirculating CVA16 SHZH05 strain for 96 h. SHZH05 and all four CC strains
caused a cytopathic effect (CPE) in BHK and Vero cells, but not the other three
cell lines.
Circulating CC strains, but not the noncirculating SHZH05 strain, induced lethal
symptoms and mortality in neonatal mice
To test whether the circulating (CC024) and noncirculating (SHZH05) strains differed
in virulence, the disease scores and the mortality rates of newborn mice were
recorded until 21 days post-infection. All mice infected with the CC024, CC045, CC090
or CC163 strain became sick by day 3 post-infection, had a mean clinical score of
grade 1, and mortality reached 100% by day 6 (Figure
2). As expected, the mock-infectedmice had clinical scores of grade 0 and
a 100% survival rate.
Figure 2
Clinical scores and survival of neonatal mice infected with circulating
Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) Changchun (CC) strains CC024, CC045, CC090, or
CC163, or the noncirculating CVA16 SHZH05 strain. Neonatal mice (n=8-10 per
litter) were intracerebrally infected with 20 µL of 105.5
CCID50/mL of each of the CVA16 virus strains, or mock infected
with DMEM. The mean clinical scores and survival rates were monitored and
recorded daily for 21 days postinfection.
The mice challenged with 20 µL of the CC024 strain at 105.5
CCID50/mL showed signs of illness on days 3 to 10 (clinical scores of
grade 1 to 5) and 100% mortality on day 7 (Figures
2 and 3A). The circulating CC024
strain demonstrated dose-dependent disease symptoms and mortality; dose-dependent
mortality was also observed with the other circulating CC strains (CC045, CC090, and
CC163). Mice infected with 103.5 CCID50/mL strains CC163,
CC045, or CC090 started to die on days 4 or 5, with 100% mortality on days 9, 10, and
11, respectively (Figure 3B,C,D). Mice infected
with circulating CC strains at 104.5 CCID50/mL or
105.5 CCID50/mL exhibited increasing morbidity on days 3 to
5, with 100% mortality on days 7 to 8 (Figure
3B,C,D). All the CC strain infections were lethal, but SHZH05 strain
infections failed to induce illness or death in the neonatal mice (data not
shown).
Figure 3
Survival of neonatal mice infected with circulating Coxsackievirus A16
(CVA16) Changchun (CC) strains CC024, CC045, CC090 or CC163 at different doses.
Neonatal mice in each group (n=8-10 per litter) were intracerebrally infected
with each of the above CVA16 strains at different doses from 103.5
to 105.5 CCID50/mL, or mock infected with DMEM
medium.
Pathological analysis of the SHZH05 and CC024 strain infections in neonatal
mice
Pathological analysis was carried out in brain, lung, spinal and hind-limb muscle,
liver, kidney, spleen, heart and intestine tissues from mice infected with the CC024
strain, which was considered representative of the four CC strains, and the SHZH05
strain. CC024 infection caused obvious lung tissue lesions, including severe alveolar
shrinkage (Figure 4B), scattered areas of
pulmonary fibrosis (Figure 4B), pulmonary
edema, vascular dilation and congestion, severe necrosis of skeletal muscle, muscle
bundle fracture, and dissolution of muscle fibers (Figure 4E and H). No pathological changes were observed in tissues of mice
infected with the SHZH05 strain (Figure 4C,F,I)
or of mock infected neonatalmice (Figure
4A,D,G). These results demonstrate that the CC024 strain had a strong
tropism for muscle and lung tissues and was responsible for the severe lesions in
these tissues, but that the SHZH05 strain did not have a muscle tropism or cause any
lesions in this neonatal mouse model.
Figure 4
Histological analysis of tissues from Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16)-infected
neonatal mice. One-day-old SPF ICR mice were infected intracerebrally with 20
µL of 105.5 CCID50/mL of the CC024 or the SHZH05 strain,
or mock infected with DMEM. No histological change was observed in the lung
tissue, hind limb muscle, and spinal skeletal muscle of the SHZH05
strain-infected (C, F, and
I) or mock-infected mice (A,
D, and G). Mice with grade 5 clinical
symptoms infected with the CC024 strain virus exhibited severe alveolar
shrinkage and vascular congestion (arrow) in the lung tissue
(B), severe necrosis and loose muscle fibers in the hind
limb muscle (E) and spinal skeletal muscle
(H). Magnification 400×. All experiments were repeated three
times.
Kinetics of viral replication in various tissues of the SHZH05 or CC024
strain-infected neonatal mice
To further understand the replication and distribution of the SHZH05 and CC024
strains in infected mice, we determined the viral loads in various tissues on
different days postinfection. At 2 days postinfection, viral loads were detected only
in the heart (102.652 copies/mg), brain (103.322 copies/mg) and
blood (103.052 copies/mL) of CC024 strain-infected mice (Figure 5). The viral loads were increased in the
heart, lung, brain, intestine, spinal and hind-limb muscle, and blood of the CC024
strain-infected mice at 3 and 4 days postinfection (Figure 5). However, no viruses were detected in any tissues of SHZH05
strain-infected or mock-infectedmice.
Figure 5
Mean viral loads in tissues of Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) CC024 or CVA16
SHZH05 strain-infected neonatal mice with 20 μL of 105.5
CCID50/mL at 2, 3, 4, or 5 days (d) postinfection. Viral loads
were assessed by qRT-PCR amplification of the viruses in the heart, lung,
brain, intestine, spine skeletal muscle, hind limb muscle tissues and the blood
from the infected mice. Results are reported as log10 copies/mg
tissue or log10 copies/mL blood±SD. There were 3 mice per group;
experiments were repeated 3 times.
Genetic sequence alignment
Gene sequence analysis by DNAMAN software revealed a 3.76% diversity between the
SHZH05 and CC024 strains in the 5′ untranslated regions (UTR). Approximately 6.54,
6.34, and 7.04% diversity was seen in the viral genome nucleotide sequences of viral
functional polyproteins P1, P2, and P3, respectively. Diversities of 0.7, 1.21 and
1.73% were observed in the corresponding P1, P2, and P3 amino acid sequences (P1:
R51K, K52R, T295A, H364R, N464S, R850K; P2: S37T, M165V, S180N, K191R, V345T, K355R,
R529K; P3: N11S, S48P, S299P, A320V, Y322H, S328N, T335S, I383T, Y397H, F434L, R570K,
I595V, R637K), respectively (Table 1).
Discussion
An enterovirus 17 (EV71) vaccine has been developed (8), but whether this vaccine candidate cross-protects against CV infection
remains unknown. Furthermore, a CV vaccine candidate developed in a mouse model was
found to cause severe lesions in muscle and lung tissue (9). We evaluated in vitro viral replication in different
cell lines and pathogenicity in a neonatal mouse model to determine the pathogenic
safety and replication capacity of the noncirculating CVA16 SHZH05 and circulating CVA16
Changchun (CC) strains. We found that the SHZH05 strain had a replication capability
similar to the four CC strains in vitro. However, the SHZH05 strain was
less pathogenic than the CC strains in the neonatal mouse model. All four CC strains,
but not the SHZH05 strain, caused tissue-specific pathological changes and lethal
infections.We found that the SHZH05 strain had similar replication capacities in each of the cell
lines, including the ML-1 cell primary cultures. However, histopathological analysis and
viral load measurements confirmed that it failed to replicate in neonatal mouse tissues.
The capacity to replicate in vitro and the improved safety indicate
that the SHZH05 strain may be a better CV candidate than the CC024 strain vaccine (9). It is still not clear why the circulating CC024,
but not the noncirculating SHZH05 virus strain, caused death in the neonatal mice. One
reason might be that some genetic changes have occurred within the SHZH05 genome,
resulting in a failure of the receptors on the surface of neonatal mouse cells to
recognize the SHZH05 strain. In fact, the CVA16 and EV71 strains are unable to infect
some mouse-derived cell lines, such as L929 and Ltr246, because there are no CVA16- or
EV71-related receptors on the cell surface (14).
It should be noted that comparative analysis of the SHZH05 and CVA16 CC024 strains
revealed differences in the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of functional
polyproteins P1, P2 and P3 (Table 1). These
changes might account for the difference in pathogenicity of the SHZH05 and CC024
strains. Further study of the lack of infectivity of the SHZH05 strain in neonatal mice
is important for the development of a CV vaccine.The pathological analysis of infected neonatal mouse tissues indicated a CC024 strain
tropism toward lung and muscle, which is in line with the findings of a previous study
(9). Furthermore, viral load analysis
demonstrated that the CC024 strain distributed among all of the tissues examined, but
that the SHZH05 strain was not found in any of the tissues. These results further
indicate that the noncirculating SHZH05 strain might be a safer CV vaccine candidate,
the efficacy of which would be worth testing in a further study.The noncirculating CVA16 SHZH05 strain had a replication capacity similar to the four
circulating CVA16 CC strains in vitro, but unlike the circulating CC024
strain, it failed to replicate or cause adverse pathological changes and mortality
in vivo. These differences might result from differences in
nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the functional P1, P2 and P3 polyproteins in the
two strains. Our findings demonstrated that the CVA16 SHZH05 strain may be a potentially
safer CV vaccine candidate for prevention of HMFD than other available strains.