| Literature DB >> 25830104 |
Matthew M Smith1, Andrew M Ramey2.
Abstract
To understand the role of migratory birds in the movement and transmission of haematozoa within and between continental regions, we examined 804 blood samples collected from eleven endemic species of South American waterfowl in Peru and Argentina for infection by Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and/or Leucocytozoon blood parasites. Infections were detected in 25 individuals of six species for an overall apparent prevalence rate of 3.1%. Analysis of haematozoa mitochondrial DNA revealed twelve distinct parasite haplotypes infecting South American waterfowl, four of which were identical to lineages previously observed infecting ducks and swans sampled in North America. Analysis of parasite mitochondrial DNA sequences revealed close phylogenetic relationships between lineages originating from waterfowl samples regardless of continental affiliation. In contrast, more distant phylogenetic relationships were observed between parasite lineages from waterfowl and passerines sampled in South America for Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon, suggesting some level of host specificity for parasites of these genera. The detection of identical parasite lineages in endemic, South American waterfowl and North American ducks and swans, paired with the close phylogenetic relationships of haematozoa infecting waterfowl on both continents, provides evidence for parasite redistribution between these regions by migratory birds.Entities:
Keywords: Anatidae; Blood parasites; Cytochrome b; Haematozoa; South America; Waterfowl
Year: 2015 PMID: 25830104 PMCID: PMC4356868 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Map of sampling locations in Peru and Argentina. The number of waterfowl blood samples collected at each site is provided in parentheses.
Number of blood samples from South American waterfowl detected as positive for Leucocytozoon, Haemoproteus, and Plasmodium parasites by country and species.
| Sample origin (country and species) | Samples tested | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peru | ||||
| | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 77 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| | 65 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| | 49 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 177 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
| | 96 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| | ||||
| Argentina | ||||
| | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| |
Haematozoa mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b haplotypes detected in South American waterfowl species and results of comparison to previously identified parasite lineages as listed on the MalAvi and GenBank databases.
| Haplotype | Host species | MalAvi/GenBank lineage | Identity score MalAvi/GenBank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haem 1 | Cygnus01/TUSW07 | 100%/100% | |
| Haem 2 | Cygnus01/TUSW07 | 99%/99% | |
| Haem 3 | Cygnus01/TUSW07 | 99%/99% | |
| Leuc 1 | TUSW04/TUSW04 | 100%/100% | |
| Leuc 2 | HELLI02/NOPI04 | 97%/100% | |
| Leuc 3 | HELLI02/NOPI04 | 96%/98% | |
| Leuc 4 | TUSW05/TUSW05 | 100%/100% | |
| Plas 1 | BT7 | 99%/99% | |
| Plas 2 | MILANS05 | 100%/100% | |
| Plas 3 | TFUS05 | 100%/100% | |
| Plas 4 | PESA01 | 100%/100% | |
| Plas 5 | PADOM11 | 100%/100% |
Fig. 2Minimum spanning network for haematozoa mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b haplotypes detected in South American waterfowl. Shaded circles represent un-sampled nodes. All circles are drawn proportional to the frequency at which haplotypes were observed. Lines separating nodes are drawn to scale based on the number of nucleotide mutations, unless otherwise indicated by hash marks. Only haplotypes with a length of 358 bp or greater were included. Haplotype name abbreviations are as follows: Haem = Haemoproteus, Leuc = Leucocytozoon, and Plas = Plasmodium.
Fig. 3Bayesian phylogenetic tree of haematozoa mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b haplotypes obtained from infected waterfowl. Trees were rooted with mammalian Plasmodium outgroups. Node tips are labeled with parasite genus (Haem = Haemoproteus, Leuc = Leucocytozoon, and Plas = Plasmodium), followed by the lineage name, GenBank accession number for each sequence, host order (passerine/waterfowl), and the country/state from which the samples were collected. All haplotypes identified in this study are highlighted in red. Numbers on branches represent posterior probabilities from the analysis. Asterisks after node tip labels indicate sequences from our study that were identical to lineages previously found in non-waterfowl hosts. All reference sequences were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information website.