Nina Matheis1, Franz H Grus2, Matthias Breitenfeld3, Ivo Knych3, Sebastian Funke4, Susanne Pitz5, Katharina A Ponto5, Norbert Pfeiffer5, George J Kahaly6. 1. Experimental Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany 2Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 2. Experimental Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany 3Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 3. Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 4. Experimental Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 6. Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany 4Department of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO), the dry eye syndrome occurs frequently, and symptoms and signs of both disorders overlap making early and accurate differential diagnosis difficult. A differentiation via specific markers is warranted. METHODS: Tear fluid samples of 120 subjects with TAO, TAO + dry eye, dry eye, and controls were collected. The samples were measured using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. The identified proteins were tested with antibody microarrays. RESULTS: Proteomics identified deregulated proteins in TAO and dry eye. Compared with dry eye, proline-rich protein 1 (PROL1, P = 0.002); uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose-dehydrogenase (UGDH, P = 0.017); calgranulin A (S10A8, P < 0.0001); transcription-activator BRG1 (SMCA4, P < 0.0001); annexin A1 (P = 0.007); cystatin (P = 0.009); heat shock protein 27 (P = 0.03); and galectin (P = 0.04) were markedly downregulated in TAO. Compared with healthy controls, PROL1 (P < 0.05.); proline-rich protein 4 (PRP4, P < 0.05), S10A8 (P = 0.004) and SMCA4 (P = 0.002) were downregulated in TAO. In contrast, the proteins midasin and POTE-ankyrin-domain family-member I were upregulated in TAO versus healthy controls (P < 0.05). Protein dysregulation was associated with inflammatory response and cell death. Antibody microarray confirmed significant changes of PRP4, PROL1, and UGDH between TAO and dry eye or healthy controls (P < 0.01). The presence of these three proteins was negatively correlated with smoking (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Proteomics of tear fluid demonstrated an upregulation of inflammatory proteins versus a downregulation of protective proteins in TAO, and a significantly different protein panel in TAO versus dry eye and/or controls. The spectrum of inflammatory and protective proteins might be a useful indicator for disease activity and ocular surface disease in patients with TAO.
PURPOSE: In patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO), the dry eye syndrome occurs frequently, and symptoms and signs of both disorders overlap making early and accurate differential diagnosis difficult. A differentiation via specific markers is warranted. METHODS: Tear fluid samples of 120 subjects with TAO, TAO + dry eye, dry eye, and controls were collected. The samples were measured using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. The identified proteins were tested with antibody microarrays. RESULTS: Proteomics identified deregulated proteins in TAO and dry eye. Compared with dry eye, proline-rich protein 1 (PROL1, P = 0.002); uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose-dehydrogenase (UGDH, P = 0.017); calgranulin A (S10A8, P < 0.0001); transcription-activator BRG1 (SMCA4, P < 0.0001); annexin A1 (P = 0.007); cystatin (P = 0.009); heat shock protein 27 (P = 0.03); and galectin (P = 0.04) were markedly downregulated in TAO. Compared with healthy controls, PROL1 (P < 0.05.); proline-rich protein 4 (PRP4, P < 0.05), S10A8 (P = 0.004) and SMCA4 (P = 0.002) were downregulated in TAO. In contrast, the proteins midasin and POTE-ankyrin-domain family-member I were upregulated in TAO versus healthy controls (P < 0.05). Protein dysregulation was associated with inflammatory response and cell death. Antibody microarray confirmed significant changes of PRP4, PROL1, and UGDH between TAO and dry eye or healthy controls (P < 0.01). The presence of these three proteins was negatively correlated with smoking (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Proteomics of tear fluid demonstrated an upregulation of inflammatory proteins versus a downregulation of protective proteins in TAO, and a significantly different protein panel in TAO versus dry eye and/or controls. The spectrum of inflammatory and protective proteins might be a useful indicator for disease activity and ocular surface disease in patients with TAO.
Authors: Mark D P Willcox; Pablo Argüeso; Georgi A Georgiev; Juha M Holopainen; Gordon W Laurie; Tom J Millar; Eric B Papas; Jannick P Rolland; Tannin A Schmidt; Ulrike Stahl; Tatiana Suarez; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Omür Ö Uçakhan; Lyndon Jones Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Hadi Khazaei; Danesh Khazaei; Rohan Verma; John Ng; Phillip A Wilmarth; Larry L David; James T Rosenbaum Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Javier Soria; Arantxa Acera; Jesús Merayo-LLoves; Juan A Durán; Nerea González; Sandra Rodriguez; Nikitas Bistolas; Soeren Schumacher; Frank F Bier; Harald Peter; Walter Stöcklein; Tatiana Suárez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 4.379