Literature DB >> 25829411

Influence of translaminar pressure dynamics on the position of the anterior lamina cribrosa surface.

Dae Seung Lee1, Eun Ji Lee1, Tae-Woo Kim1, Young Ho Park2, Jungeun Kim2, Joon Woo Lee3, SangYun Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how the translaminar pressure difference (TLPD) and gradient (TLPG) influence the position of anterior lamina cribrosa (LC) surface.
METHODS: Twenty-six eyes of 26 healthy subjects were subjected to enhanced-depth imaging volume scanning of the optic nerve using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The anterior LC surface depth (LCD) relative to the Bruch's membrane (BM) opening was measured at 11 equidistant planes, and the LC thickness (LCT) was measured at three locations (superior midperipheral, midhorizontal, and inferior midperipheral). Intraocular pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) were measured on the same day as the SD-OCT examination. The TLPD was defined as the difference between IOP and CSFP (i.e., IOP-CSFP), and the TLPG as the TLPD divided by LCT (i.e., TLPD/LCT).
RESULTS: Subjects were aged 63.4 ± 8.0 years and comprised 12 males and 14 females. Regression analyses revealed a significant association between a larger mean LCD and male sex (P = 0.002), and between a larger central LCD and male sex (P ≤ 0.012), larger TLPD (P = 0.048), and higher TLPG (P = 0.029). There was no significant association between IOP, CSFP, and LCT, and either the mean LCD (P = 0.438, 0.368, and 0.416, respectively) or central LCD (P = 0.284, 0.085, and 0.144, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: A larger central LCD was associated with larger TLPD and higher TLPG in healthy eyes, which indicates that the translaminar pressure dynamics may play a role in the position of the anterior LC surface relative to BM opening in healthy human eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25829411     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

1.  Relative Contributions of Intraocular and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressures to the Biomechanics of the Lamina Cribrosa and Laminar Neural Tissues.

Authors:  Alireza Karimi; Reza Razaghi; Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

2.  Clinical Factors Associated with Lamina Cribrosa Thickness in Patients with Glaucoma, as Measured with Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Kazuko Omodaka; Seri Takahashi; Akiko Matsumoto; Shigeto Maekawa; Tsutomu Kikawa; Noriko Himori; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Kazuichi Maruyama; Hiroshi Kunikata; Masahiro Akiba; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quantitative analysis of neural tissues around the optic disc after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Hyun Seung Yang; June-Gone Kim; Jae Bong Cha; Young In Yun; Jong Hoon Park; Jong Eun Woo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Relative Contributions of Intracranial Pressure and Intraocular Pressure on Lamina Cribrosa Behavior.

Authors:  Junfei Tong; Deepta Ghate; Sachin Kedar; Linxia Gu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Age-Dependent Variation of Lamina Cribrosa Displacement During the Standardized Valsalva Maneuver.

Authors:  Yong Woo Kim; Dong Hyun Lee; Hyung Bin Lim; Baek-Lok Oh; Young Kook Kim; Michael J A Girard; Jean Martial Mari; Ki Ho Park; Jin Wook Jeoung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of the Deep Optic Nerve Head Structure between Normal-Tension Glaucoma and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Yun Jeong Choi; Tae-Woo Kim; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Systemic and Ocular Hemodynamic Risk Factors in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Jaewan Choi; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.