Literature DB >> 25829126

The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting.

Viviana Toro-Ibacache1, Víctor Zapata Muñoz2, Paul O'Higgins3.   

Abstract

The human skull is gracile when compared to many Middle Pleistocene hominins. It has been argued that it is less able to generate and withstand high masticatory forces, and that the morphology of the lower portion of the modern human face correlates most strongly with dietary characteristics. This study uses geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the relationship between skull morphology, muscle force and cranial deformations arising from biting, which is relevant in understanding how skull morphology relates to mastication. The three-dimensional skull anatomies of 20 individuals were reconstructed from medical computed tomograms. Maximal contractile muscle forces were estimated from muscular anatomical cross-sectional areas (CSAs). Fifty-nine landmarks were used to represent skull morphology. A partial least squares analysis was performed to assess the association between skull shape and muscle force, and FEA was used to compare the deformation (strains) generated during incisor and molar bites in two individuals representing extremes of morphological variation in the sample. The results showed that only the proportion of total muscle CSA accounted for by the temporalis appears associated with skull morphology, albeit weekly. However, individuals with a large temporalis tend to possess a relatively wider face, a narrower, more vertically oriented maxilla and a lower positioning of the coronoid process. The FEAs showed that, despite differences in morphology, biting results in similar modes of deformation for both crania, but with localised lower magnitudes of strains arising in the individual with the narrowest, most vertically oriented maxilla. Our results suggest that the morphology of the maxilla modulates the transmission of forces generated during mastication to the rest of the cranium by deforming less in individuals with the ability to generate proportionately larger temporalis muscle forces.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Geometric morphometrics; Masticatory function; Modern humans; Skull morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25829126     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  18 in total

1.  Correlation between gingival phenotype in the aesthetic zone and craniofacial profile-a CBCT-based study.

Authors:  Sa Cha; Sueng Min Lee; Chengxiaoxue Zhang; Zhen Tan; Qing Zhao
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Could mastication modify the shape of the orbit? A scannographic study in humans.

Authors:  Melanie Arnaud-Brachet; Jean Marc Foletti; Nicolas Graillon; Katia Chaumoître; Cyrille Chossegros; Laurent Guyot
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  RANGE OF MOUTH OPENING AMONG THREE MAJOR ETHNIC GROUPS IN NIGERIA.

Authors:  O O Gbolahan; B B Osinaike; C I Udoye; O W Olawole
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2019-12

4.  Congenital muscle dystrophy and diet consistency affect mouse skull shape differently.

Authors:  Alexander Spassov; Viviana Toro-Ibacache; Mirjam Krautwald; Heinrich Brinkmeier; Kornelius Kupczik
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Validity and sensitivity of a human cranial finite element model: implications for comparative studies of biting performance.

Authors:  Viviana Toro-Ibacache; Laura C Fitton; Michael J Fagan; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Landmark-free, parametric hypothesis tests regarding two-dimensional contour shapes using coherent point drift registration and statistical parametric mapping.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Masahide Yagi; Noriaki Ichihashi; Philip G Cox
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-05-18

7.  Human mandibular shape is associated with masticatory muscle force.

Authors:  Tanya Sella-Tunis; Ariel Pokhojaev; Rachel Sarig; Paul O'Higgins; Hila May
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Human feeding biomechanics: performance, variation, and functional constraints.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Paul C Dechow; Qian Wang; Poorva H Gharpure; Adam D Gordon; Karen L Baab; Amanda L Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Craig Byron; Stephen Wroe; David S Strait
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Morphological change in cranial shape following the transition to agriculture across western Eurasia.

Authors:  Olivia Cheronet; John A Finarelli; Ron Pinhasi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness in patients with normal and open vertical skeletal configurations using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Piyoros Suteerapongpun; Tanapan Wattanachai; Apirum Janhom; Polbhat Tripuwabhrut; Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.