Literature DB >> 25829006

Symmetry is less than meets the eye.

Deborah Apthorp1, Jason Bell2.   

Abstract

Symmetry is a ubiquitous feature in the visual environment and can be detected by a variety of species, ranging from insects through to humans [1,2]. Here we show it can also bias estimates of basic scene properties. Mirror (reflective) symmetry can be detected in as little as 50 ms, in both natural and artificial visual scenes, and even when embedded within cluttered backgrounds [1]. In terms of its biological relevance, symmetry is a key determinant in mate selection; the degree of symmetry in a face is positively associated with perceived healthiness and attractiveness ratings [3]. In short, symmetry processing mechanisms are an important part of the neural machinery of vision. We reveal that the importance of symmetry extends beyond the processing of shape and objects. Mirror symmetry biases our perception of scene content, with symmetrical patterns appearing to have fewer components than their asymmetric counterparts. This demonstrates an interaction between two fundamental dimensions of visual analysis: symmetry [1] and number [4]. We propose that this numerical underestimation results from a processing bias away from the redundant information within mirror symmetrical displays, extending existing theories regarding redundancy in visual analysis [5,6].
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25829006     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  12 in total

1.  Looking for symmetry: fixational eye movements are biased by image mirror symmetry.

Authors:  Andrew Isaac Meso; Anna Montagnini; Jason Bell; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Relationship between Sitting and the Use of Symmetry As a Cue to Figure-Ground Assignment in 6.5-Month-Old Infants.

Authors:  Shannon Ross-Sheehy; Sammy Perone; Shaun P Vecera; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-31

3.  Grouping effects in numerosity perception under prolonged viewing conditions.

Authors:  Leo Poom; Marcus Lindskog; Anders Winman; Ronald van den Berg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Similarly oriented objects appear more numerous.

Authors:  Nicholas K DeWind; Michael F Bonner; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The Contribution of Shape Features and Demographic Variables to Disembedding Abilities.

Authors:  Elisa Morgana Cappello; Giada Lettieri; Andrea Patricelli Malizia; Sonia d'Arcangelo; Giacomo Handjaras; Nicola Lattanzi; Emiliano Ricciardi; Luca Cecchetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-29

6.  Adaptation to number operates on perceived rather than physical numerosity.

Authors:  M Fornaciai; G M Cicchini; D C Burr
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-03-14

Review 7.  Number As a Primary Perceptual Attribute: A Review.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; Guido Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The human visual system preserves the hierarchy of two-dimensional pattern regularity.

Authors:  Peter J Kohler; Alasdair D F Clarke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  The Role of Visual Eccentricity on Preference for Abstract Symmetry.

Authors:  Giulia Rampone; Noreen O' Sullivan; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Grouping strategies in number estimation extend the subitizing range.

Authors:  Paula A Maldonado Moscoso; Elisa Castaldi; David C Burr; Roberto Arrighi; Giovanni Anobile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.