Utaroh Motosugi1,2, Diego Hernando1, Peter Bannas1,3, James H Holmes4, Kang Wang4, Ann Shimakawa5, Yuji Iwadate6, Valentina Taviani7, Jennifer L Rehm8, Scott B Reeder1,9,10,11,12. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan. 3. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 5. Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA. 6. Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Hino, Japan. 7. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 9. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 10. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 11. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 12. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate free-breathing chemical shift-encoded (CSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantification of hepatic proton density fat-fraction (PDFF). A secondary purpose was to evaluate hepatic R2* values measured using free-breathing quantitative CSE-MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age, 56 years) were prospectively recruited and underwent the following four acquisitions to measure PDFF and R2*; 1) conventional breath-hold CSE-MRI (BH-CSE); 2) respiratory-gated CSE-MRI using respiratory bellows (BL-CSE); 3) respiratory-gated CSE-MRI using navigator echoes (NV-CSE); and 4) single voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) as the reference standard for PDFF. Image quality was evaluated by two radiologists. MRI-PDFF measured from the three CSE-MRI methods were compared with MRS-PDFF using linear regression. The PDFF and R2* values were compared using two one-sided t-test to evaluate statistical equivalence. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the image quality scores among the three CSE-MRI methods for either PDFF (P = 1.000) or R2* maps (P = 0.359-1.000). Correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the PDFF comparisons were 0.98 (0.96-0.99) for BH-, 0.99 (0.97-0.99) for BL-, and 0.99 (0.98-0.99) for NV-CSE. The statistical equivalence test revealed that the mean difference in PDFF and R2* between any two of the three CSE-MRI methods was less than ±1 percentage point (pp) and ±5 s(-1) , respectively (P < 0.046). CONCLUSION: Respiratory-gated CSE-MRI with respiratory bellows or navigator echo are feasible methods to quantify liver PDFF and R2* and are as valid as the standard breath-hold technique.
PURPOSE: To evaluate free-breathing chemical shift-encoded (CSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantification of hepatic proton density fat-fraction (PDFF). A secondary purpose was to evaluate hepatic R2* values measured using free-breathing quantitative CSE-MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age, 56 years) were prospectively recruited and underwent the following four acquisitions to measure PDFF and R2*; 1) conventional breath-hold CSE-MRI (BH-CSE); 2) respiratory-gated CSE-MRI using respiratory bellows (BL-CSE); 3) respiratory-gated CSE-MRI using navigator echoes (NV-CSE); and 4) single voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) as the reference standard for PDFF. Image quality was evaluated by two radiologists. MRI-PDFF measured from the three CSE-MRI methods were compared with MRS-PDFF using linear regression. The PDFF and R2* values were compared using two one-sided t-test to evaluate statistical equivalence. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the image quality scores among the three CSE-MRI methods for either PDFF (P = 1.000) or R2* maps (P = 0.359-1.000). Correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the PDFF comparisons were 0.98 (0.96-0.99) for BH-, 0.99 (0.97-0.99) for BL-, and 0.99 (0.98-0.99) for NV-CSE. The statistical equivalence test revealed that the mean difference in PDFF and R2* between any two of the three CSE-MRI methods was less than ±1 percentage point (pp) and ±5 s(-1) , respectively (P < 0.046). CONCLUSION: Respiratory-gated CSE-MRI with respiratory bellows or navigator echo are feasible methods to quantify liver PDFF and R2* and are as valid as the standard breath-hold technique.
Authors: Hersh Chandarana; Tobias K Block; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ruth P Lim; Danny Kim; David J Mossa; James S Babb; Berthold Kiefer; Vivian S Lee Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Catherine D G Hines; Charles A McKenzie; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Nathan S Artz; Catherine D G Hines; Stephen T Brunner; Rashmi M Agni; Jens-Peter Kühn; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Guang-Hong Chen; Scott B Reeder Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Camilo A Campo; Diego Hernando; Tilman Schubert; Candice A Bookwalter; Andrew J Van Pay; Scott B Reeder Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Takeshi Yokoo; Suraj D Serai; Ali Pirasteh; Mustafa R Bashir; Gavin Hamilton; Diego Hernando; Houchun H Hu; Holger Hetterich; Jens-Peter Kühn; Guido M Kukuk; Rohit Loomba; Michael S Middleton; Nancy A Obuchowski; Ji Soo Song; An Tang; Xinhuai Wu; Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: B Dustin Pooler; Diego Hernando; Jeannine A Ruby; Hiroshi Ishii; Ann Shimakawa; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ante Zhu; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Sydney M Nguyen; Thaddeus G Golos; Ann Shimakawa; Matthias R Muehler; Christopher J Francois; Ian M Bird; Sean B Fain; Dinesh M Shah; Oliver Wieben; Diego Hernando Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Huiwen Luo; Ante Zhu; Curtis N Wiens; Jitka Starekova; Ann Shimakawa; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Diego Hernando Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ralf B Loeffler; M Beth McCarville; Anne W Wagstaff; Matthew P Smeltzer; Axel J Krafft; Ruitian Song; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-10-17
Authors: Ruiyang Zhao; Yuxin Zhang; Xiaoke Wang; Timothy J Colgan; Jennifer L Rehm; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Diego Hernando Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 4.668