Literature DB >> 25828369

An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.

Shawn Montpetit1, Patrick O'Donnell2.   

Abstract

Gun crimes are a significant problem facing law enforcement agencies. Traditional forensic examination of firearms involves comparisons of markings imparted to bullets and cartridge casings during the firing process. DNA testing of casings and cartridges may not be routinely done in crime laboratories due a variety of factors including the typically low amounts of DNA recovered. The San Diego Police Department (SDPD) Crime Laboratory conducted a study to optimize the collection and profiling of DNA from fired and unfired ammunition. The method was optimized to where interpretable DNA results were obtained for 26.1% of the total number of forensic casework evidence samples, and provided some insights into the level of secondary transfer that might be expected from this type of evidence. Briefly detailed are the results from the experimental study and the forensic casework analysis using the optimized process. Mixtures (samples having more DNA types than the loader's known genotype detected or visible at any marker) were obtained in 39.8% of research samples and the likely source of DNA mixtures is discussed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Ammunition; Cartridges; Casings; Forensic science; STR; Touch DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25828369     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of different methods of DNA recovery and PCR amplification in STR profiling of casings-a retrospective study.

Authors:  Verica Radojicic; Milica Keckarevic Markovic; Feđa Puac; Miljana Kecmanovic; Dusan Keckarevic
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.