| Literature DB >> 25828258 |
Bruce C McGorum, R Scott Pirie, Laura Glendinning, Gerry McLachlan, James S Metcalf, Sandra A Banack, Paul A Cox, Geoffrey A Codd.
Abstract
While toxins from aquatic cyanobacteria are a well-recognised cause of disease in birds and animals, exposure of grazing livestock to terrestrial cyanobacteria has not been described. This study identified terrestrial cyanobacteria, predominantly Phormidium spp., in the biofilm of plants from most livestock fields investigated. Lower numbers of other cyanobacteria, microalgae and fungi were present on many plants. Cyanobacterial 16S rDNA, predominantly from Phormidium spp., was detected in all samples tested, including 6 plant washings, 1 soil sample and ileal contents from 2 grazing horses. Further work was performed to test the hypothesis that ingestion of cyanotoxins contributes to the pathogenesis of some currently unexplained diseases of grazing horses, including equine grass sickness (EGS), equine motor neuron disease (EMND) and hepatopathy. Phormidium population density was significantly higher on EGS fields than on control fields. The cyanobacterial neurotoxic amino acid 2,4-diaminobutyric acid (DAB) was detected in plant washings from EGS fields, but worst case scenario estimations suggested the dose would be insufficient to cause disease. Neither DAB nor the cyanobacterial neurotoxins β-N-methylamino-L-alanine and N-(2-aminoethyl) glycine were detected in neural tissue from 6 EGS horses, 2 EMND horses and 7 control horses. Phormidium was present in low numbers on plants where horses had unexplained hepatopathy. This study did not yield evidence linking known cyanotoxins with disease in grazing horses. However, further study is warranted to identify and quantify toxins produced by cyanobacteria on livestock fields, and determine whether, under appropriate conditions, known or unknown cyanotoxins contribute to currently unexplained diseases in grazing livestock.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25828258 PMCID: PMC4342207 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-015-0143-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Figure 1Microscopic appearance of filaments. Four Phormidium filaments (arrows) in plant washings. Unstained specimen.
Figure 2Plants from EGS fields had significantly higher population densities of filaments than plants from other fields. Population density of Phormidium filaments (log10 [x + 1] g wet mass plants−1) on plants from EGS (n = 21), horse control (n = 40), cattle (n = 13) and sheep (n = 14) fields. Medians and inter-group significances are marked.
Figure 3Population densities of filaments varied considerably, both within and between fields. Spatial variation in density of Phormidium filaments (log10 [x + 1] g wet mass plants−1) across transects in an EGS field (A) and a horse control field (B). Each datum point represents the density for each of 10 points across the field transect. Medians are marked.
Figure 4Population densities of filaments on plants collected at 0700 h and 1900 h did not differ significantly. Comparison of the population density of Phormidium filaments (log10 [x + 1] g wet mass plants−1) in 9 fields (3 EGS fields with solid line, 6 horse control fields with broken line) in samples collected at 0700 h and 1900 h (data not significantly different). Medians are marked.
Figure 5Weekly variation in population density of filaments on plants. Weekly variation in population density of Phormidium filaments (g wet mass plants−1) on plants from one horse control (broken line) field and 7 fields (solid lines) on which there was at least one case of EGS within the preceding 2 years.