Literature DB >> 25828209

Effectiveness of eye armor during blast loading.

Shantanu Bailoor1, Rajneesh Bhardwaj2, Thao D Nguyen3.   

Abstract

Ocular trauma is one of the most common types of combat injuries resulting from the interaction of military personnel with improvised explosive devices. Ocular blast injury mechanisms are complex, and trauma may occur through various injury mechanisms. However, primary blast injuries (PBI) are an important cause of ocular trauma that may go unnoticed and result in significant damage to internal ocular tissues and visual impairment. Further, the effectiveness of commonly employed eye armor, designed for ballistic and laser protection, in lessening the severity of adverse blast overpressures (BOP) is unknown. In this paper, we employed a three-dimensional (3D) fluid-structure interaction computational model for assessing effectiveness of the eye armor during blast loading on human eyes and validated results against free field blast measurements by Bentz and Grimm (2013). Numerical simulations show that the blast waves focused on the ocular region because of reflections from surrounding facial features and resulted in considerable increase in BOP. We evaluated the effectiveness of spectacles and goggles in mitigating the pressure loading using the computational model. Our results corroborate experimental measurements showing that the goggles were more effective than spectacles in mitigating BOP loading on the eye. Numerical results confirmed that the goggles significantly reduced blast wave penetration in the space between the armor and the eyes and provided larger clearance space for blast wave expansion after penetration than the spectacles. The spectacles as well as the goggles were more effective in reducing reflected BOP at higher charge mass because of the larger decrease in dynamic pressures after the impact. The goggles provided greater benefit of reducing the peak pressure than the spectacles for lower charge mass. However, the goggles resulted in moderate, sustained elevated pressure loading on the eye, that became 50-100% larger than the pressure loading experienced by the unprotected eye after 0.2 ms of impact of blast wave, for lower as well as higher charge mass. The present model provides fundamental insights of flow and pressure fields in the ocular region, which helps to explain the effectiveness of the eye armor. Since the measurements of these fields are not trivial, the computational model aids in better understanding of development of PBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blast loading; Eye armor; Fluid–structure interaction; Military Combat Eye Protection (MCEP); Ocular trauma; Primary blast injuries (PBI)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25828209     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-015-0667-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  6 in total

Review 1.  Indian Soldiers Need Eye Protection.

Authors:  Kirti Nath Jha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Ocular biomechanics during improvised explosive device blast: A computational study using eye-specific models.

Authors:  Alireza Karimi; Reza Razaghi; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Protective Performance of Helmets and Goggles in Mitigating Brain Biomechanical Response to Primary Blast Exposure.

Authors:  Xiancheng Yu; Mazdak Ghajari
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Eric L Singman; Nitin Daphalapurkar; Helen White; Thao D Nguyen; Lijo Panghat; Jessica Chang; Timothy McCulley
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2016-01-11

5.  Blast Preconditioning Protects Retinal Ganglion Cells and Reveals Targets for Prevention of Neurodegeneration Following Blast-Mediated Traumatic Brian Injury.

Authors:  Matthew M Harper; Addison W Woll; Lucy P Evans; Michael Delcau; Abhigna Akurathi; Adam Hedberg-Buenz; Dana A Soukup; Nickolas Boehme; Marco M Hefti; Laura M Dutca; Michael G Anderson; Alexander G Bassuk
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Dependence of visual and cognitive outcomes on animal holder configuration in a rodent model of blast overpressure exposure.

Authors:  Rachael S Allen; Cara T Motz; Anayesha Singh; Andrew Feola; Lauren Hutson; Amber Douglass; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Lara A Skelton; Lidia Cardelle; Katie L Bales; Kyle Chesler; Kaavya Gudapati; C Ross Ethier; Matthew M Harper; Steven J Fliesler; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.886

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.