Literature DB >> 25827835

Visual acuity trade-offs and microhabitat-driven adaptation of searching behaviour in psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Aphalaridae).

Kevin Farnier1, Adrian G Dyer2, Gary S Taylor3, Richard A Peters4, Martin J Steinbauer4.   

Abstract

Insects have evolved morphological and physiological adaptations in response to selection pressures inherent to their ecology. Consequently, visual performance and acuity often significantly vary between different insect species. Whilst psychophysics has allowed for the accurate determination of visual acuity for some Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera, very little is known about other insect taxa that cannot be trained to positively respond to a given stimulus. In this study, we demonstrate that prior knowledge of insect colour preferences can be used to facilitate acuity testing. We focused on four psyllid species (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Aphalaridae), namely Ctenarytaina eucalypti, Ctenarytaina bipartita, Anoeconeossa bundoorensis and Glycaspis brimblecombei, that differ in their colour preferences and utilization of different host-plant modules (e.g. apical buds, stems, leaf lamellae) and tested their visual acuity in a modified Y-maze adapted to suit psyllid searching behaviour. Our study revealed that psyllids have visual acuity ranging from 6.3 to 8.7 deg. Morphological measurements for different species showed a close match between inter-ommatidial angles and behaviourally determined visual angles (between 5.5 and 6.6 deg) suggesting detection of colour stimuli at the single ommatidium level. Whilst our data support isometric scaling of psyllids' eyes for C. eucalypti, C. bipartita and G. brimblecombei, a morphological trade-off between light sensitivity and spatial resolution was found in A. bundoorensis. Overall, species whose microhabitat preferences require more movement between modules appear to possess superior visual acuity. The psyllid searching behaviours that we describe with the help of tracking software depict species-specific strategies that presumably evolved to optimize searching for food and oviposition sites.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye parameter; Foliage; Inter-ommatidial angle; Visual angle

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25827835     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.120808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Innate colour preferences of the Australian native stingless bee Tetragonula carbonaria Sm.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Skye Boyd-Gerny; Mani Shrestha; Klaus Lunau; Jair E Garcia; Sebastian Koethe; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Flower detection and acuity of the Australian native stingless bee Tetragonula carbonaria Sm.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Martin Streinzer; Jair Garcia
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Spatial Vision in Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Aravin Chakravarthi; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Visual detection thresholds in the Asian honeybee, Apis cerana.

Authors:  Abhishek Meena; Arya M V Kumar; G S Balamurali; Hema Somanathan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The Influence of Learning on Host Plant Preference in a Significant Phytopathogen Vector, Diaphorina citri.

Authors:  Dara G Stockton; Xavier Martini; Joseph M Patt; Lukasz L Stelinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Anatomy of the stemmata in the Photuris firefly larva.

Authors:  Frederick Murphy; Andrew Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.