Literature DB >> 25827710

Scatterhoarding rodents favor higher predation risks for cache sites: The potential for predators to influence the seed dispersal process.

Michael A Steele1, Ghislain Rompré1,2, Jeffrey A Stratford1, Hongmao Zhang1,3, Matthew Suchocki1, Shealyn Marino1.   

Abstract

Scatterhoarding rodents often place caches in the open where pilferage rates are reduced, suggesting that they tradeoff higher risks of predation for more secure cache sites. We tested this hypothesis in two study systems by measuring predation risks inferred from measures of giving-up densities (GUDs) at known cache sites and other sites for comparison. Rodent GUDs were measured with small trays containing 3 L of fine sand mixed with sunflower seeds. In the first experiment, we relied on a 2-year seed dispersal study in a natural forest to identify caches of eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) and then measured GUDs at: (i) these caches; (ii) comparable points along logs and rocks where rodent activity was assumed highest; and (iii) a set of random points. We found that GUDs and, presumably, predation risks, were higher at both cache and random points than those with cover. At the second site, we measured GUDs of eastern gray squirrels in an open park system and found that GUDs were consistently lowest at the base of the tree compared to more open sites, where previous studies show caching by squirrels to be highest and pilferage rates by naïve competitors to be lowest. These results confirm that predation risks can influence scatterhoarding decisions but that they are also highly context dependent, and that the landscape of fear, now so well documented in the literature, could potentially shape the temporal and spatial patterns of seedling establishment and forest regeneration in systems where scatterhoarding is common.
© 2015 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sciurus; giving-up densities; predation risk; scatterhoarding; seed dispersal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25827710     DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Zool        ISSN: 1749-4869            Impact factor:   2.654


  4 in total

1.  Inter-trophic Interaction of Gut Microbiota in a Tripartite System.

Authors:  Xianfeng Yi; Jiawei Guo; Minghui Wang; Chao Xue; Mengyao Ju
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Does scatter-hoarding of seeds benefit cache owners or pilferers?

Authors:  Haifeng Gu; Qingjian Zhao; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.654

3.  Context-dependent responses of food-hoarding to competitors in Apodemus peninsulae: implications for coexistence among asymmetrical species.

Authors:  Hongyu Niu; Jie Zhang; Zhiyong Wang; Guangchuan Huang; Chao Peng; Hongmao Zhang
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.654

4.  Rodent-mediated plant seed dispersal: What happens to the seeds after entering the gaps with different sizes?

Authors:  Fei Yu; Guangjie Li; Shanshan Wei; Xianfeng Yi; Jianmin Ma; Keming Ma; Guangwen Chen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.