Literature DB >> 25827620

Prognostic impact of location and extent of vessel-related ischemia at myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease.

Francesco Nudi1,2, Orazio Schillaci3, Giandomenico Neri4, Annamaria Pinto4,5, Enrica Procaccini4,5, Maurizio Vetere4, Giacomo Frati6, Fabrizio Tomai7, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) has an established diagnostic and prognostic role in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease, with ischemia severity and extent having already been identified as key predictors. Whether this is affected by the location of myocardial ischemia is uncertain. We aimed at comparing the prognostic outlook of patients undergoing MPS according to the site of ischemia.
METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for subjects undergoing MPS, without myocardial necrosis or recent revascularization. We focused on the prognostic impact of location of vessel-related ischemia (VRI) at MPS, distinguishing four mutually exclusive groups: single-VRI involving left anterior descending (LAD), single-VRI not involving LAD, multi-VRI involving LAD, and multi-VRI not involving LAD. The primary outcome was the long-term (>1 year) rate of death or myocardial infarction (D/MI).
RESULTS: A total of 13,254 patients were included. Moderate or severe VRI occurred in 2,627 (20%) patients. Clinical outcomes were significantly different among the groups of patients with moderate or severe VRI, including death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or their composites (overall P < .001). Specifically, and excluding subjects undergoing revascularization as first follow-up event, D/MI occurred in 8.4% of patients with single-VRI involving LAD, 5.5% of subjects with single-VRI not involving LAD, 16.5% of those with multi-VRI involving LAD, and 7.3% of patients with multi-VRI not involving LAD (overall P < .001). Even at incremental multivariable Cox proportional analysis, hierarchical VRI was independently associated with an increased risk of D/MI [hazard ratio = 1.17 (1.04-1.08) for each class increment, P = .010].
CONCLUSIONS: Location and extent of myocardial ischemia at MPS according to the VRI concept have a hierarchical predictive impact, with multi-VRI involving LAD being significantly and independently more prognostically ominous than other types of VRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; maximal ischemia score; myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; vessel-related ischemia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25827620     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-015-0077-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  26 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.

Authors:  Friedrich W Mohr; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Ted E Feldman; Elisabeth Ståhle; Antonio Colombo; Michael J Mack; David R Holmes; Marie-angèle Morel; Nic Van Dyck; Vicki M Houle; Keith D Dawkins; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M L Ladenheim; B H Pollock; A Rozanski; D S Berman; H M Staniloff; J S Forrester; G A Diamond
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction.

Authors:  T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Alan Rozanski; Leslee J Shaw; Gregg W Stone; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Ishac Cohen; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Altered coronary vasodilator reserve and metabolism in myocardium subtended by normal arteries in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  N G Uren; P Marraccini; R Gistri; R de Silva; P G Camici
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  A novel clinically relevant segmentation method and corresponding maximal ischemia score to risk-stratify patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Annamaria Pinto; Enrica Procaccini; Giandomenico Neri; Maurizio Vetere; Fabrizio Tomai; Achille Gaspardone; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration.

Authors:  S Yusuf; D Zucker; P Peduzzi; L D Fisher; T Takaro; J W Kennedy; K Davis; T Killip; E Passamani; R Norris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-08-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hybrid anatomo-functional imaging of coronary artery disease: Beneficial irrespective of its core components.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Andrea Romagnoli; Orazio Schillaci; Alessandro Nudi; Francesco Versaci
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic significance of ischemia location on stress myocardial perfusion SPECT: Tracing the fingerprints of the widow maker.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Real-world use of fractional flow reserve in Germany: results of the prospective ALKK coronary angiography and PCI registry.

Authors:  Tobias Härle; Uwe Zeymer; Matthias Hochadel; Ralf Zahn; Sebastian Kerber; Bernhard Zrenner; Volker Schächinger; Bernward Lauer; Thorsten Runde; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Intracoronary pressure measurement differences between anterior and posterior coronary territories.

Authors:  T Härle; S Meyer; W Bojara; F Vahldiek; A Elsässer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Bridging the Atlantic gap in clinical guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Alessandro Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Prognostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Orazio Schillaci; Natale di Belardino; Francesco Versaci; Alessandro Nudi; Annamaria Pinto; Giandomenico Neri; Enrica Procaccini; Giacomo Frati; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Impact of coronary revascularization vs medical therapy on ischemia among stable patients with or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing serial myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Francesco Nudi; Natale Di Belardino; Francesco Versaci; Annamaria Pinto; Enrica Procaccini; Giandomenico Neri; Maurizio Vetere; Giacomo Frati; Mariangela Peruzzi; Orazio Schillaci; Achille Gaspardone; Fabrizio Tomai; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.952

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.