Literature DB >> 25827600

A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth gaps.

Michael Gahlert1, Heinz Kniha1, Dieter Weingart2, Sabine Schild2, Nils-Claudius Gellrich3, Kai-Hendrik Bormann3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dental implants have traditionally been made from titanium or its alloys, but recently full-ceramic implants have been developed with comparable osseointegration properties and functional strength properties to titanium. These ceramic implants may have advantages in certain patients and situations, for example, where esthetic outcomes are particularly important.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of a newly developed full-ceramic ZrO2 monotype implant design (PURE Ceramic Implant; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) in single-tooth gaps in the maxilla and mandible.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients requiring implant rehabilitation in single-tooth gaps. Full-ceramic implants were placed, with provisional and final prostheses inserted after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Crestal bone level was measured at implant placement and after 6 and 12 months. Implant survival and success were evaluated after 6 and 12 months. Further evaluations are planned after 24 and 36 months.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients were screened for potential study participation, of whom 44 (17 men and 27 women, mean age 48 ± 14 years) were recruited into the study. The majority of implants (90.9%) were placed in the maxilla. The implant survival and implant success rate after 12 months were 97.6%. A minor change of the mean bone level occurred between implant loading (final prosthesis insertion after 6 months) and 12 months (-0.14 mm) after initial bone remodeling was observed between implant placement and loading (-0.88 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that monotype ceramic implants can achieve clinical outcomes comparable to published outcomes of equivalent titanium implants.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ceramic implant; esthetics; zirconium dioxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25827600     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

Review 1.  Surface Structure of Zirconia Implants: An Integrative Review Comparing Clinical Results with Preclinical and In Vitro Data.

Authors:  Nadja Rohr; Blerta Hoda; Jens Fischer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  Zirconium dioxide implants as an alternative to titanium: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ivana Comisso; Santiago Arias-Herrera; Saurabh Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

3.  Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant-A Case Report.

Authors:  Stefan Roehling; Georges Ghazal; Thomas Borer; Florian Thieringer; Michael Gahlert
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-17

4.  Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars.

Authors:  José María Parmigiani-Izquierdo; María Eugenia Cabaña-Muñoz; José Joaquín Merino; Arturo Sánchez-Pérez
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 5.  A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants.

Authors:  Dena Hashim; Norbert Cionca; Delphine S Courvoisier; Andrea Mombelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kai-Hendrik Bormann; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Heinz Kniha; Sabine Schild; Dieter Weingart; Michael Gahlert
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.