Literature DB >> 25827553

Water drinking test and angle closure glaucoma.

N Venugopal1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25827553      PMCID: PMC4399132          DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.154410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Kumar et al.[1] in their article titled “severe visual loss following water load for transabdominal ultrasound” have described a patient, who is a known ocular hypertensive, developing raised intraocular pressure (IOP) following waterloading. Authors have mentioned the possibility of visual loss in such patients and highlighted the importance of slow ingestion of 500 ml of water, mandatory 90 min postprocedural observation period and prompt referral to ophthalmologist if patient develops visual complaints. We appreciate the author's effort and research work. By stressing outflow facility, the water drinking test (WDT)[2] might reveal elevations in IOP that are ordinarily experienced during 24-h period. Recent work on WDT points to its potential as a predictor of peak IOP, and thus IOP fluctuations. Physiology of WDT is not fully understood. Autonomic nervous stimulation and/or increased episcleral venous pressure (EVP) remain possible mechanisms. Systemic hypertension occurs following water drinking in autonomic failure, in quadriplegia, after cardiac transplantation and to a lesser extent in older healthy individuals. Sympathetic stimulation is thought to produce this response and may also modify IOP via yet-to-be-determined mechanisms. Alternatively WDT elevates EVP and causes a transient period of negative aqueous outflow. This is likely the result of reduced outflow facility from a decreased pressure gradient across the trabecular meshwork, but other mechanism have been suggested. EVP may be implicated in both IOP instability and glaucoma progression as it is elevated in both open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients. The WDT might unmask pathologic EVP effects. Arora et al.,[3] observed a significant increase in choroidal thickness (CT)[3] and a decrease in anterior chamber depth after WDT in angle closure eyes but not in open angle eyes. Even though, IOP increase, after WDT was not fully explained by CT increase, based on their observation they have suggested the dynamic behavior of the choroid, may play a role in angle closure process. In conclusion, WDT may cause raised IOP by angle closure mechanism in susceptible eyes.
  3 in total

1.  The water drinking test.

Authors:  Ivan Goldberg; Colin I Clement
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Choroidal thickness change after water drinking is greater in angle closure than in open angle eyes.

Authors:  Karun S Arora; Joan L Jefferys; Eugenio A Maul; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Severe visual loss following waterload for transabdominal ultrasound.

Authors:  Harsh Kumar; Taru Dewan; Shashi Vashisht; Akhila Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comment on: Bilateral angle closure glaucoma: Differential diagnosis.

Authors:  N Venugopal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Authors' reply.

Authors:  Arijit Mitra; R Ramkrishanan; Mohideen Abdul Kader
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 3.  Water-drinking Test and Pharmacologic Mydriasis as Provocative Tests in Primary Angle Closure Suspects.

Authors:  Reza Razeghinejad; M Hossein Nowroozzadeh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2019-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.