Literature DB >> 25827129

A pilot evaluation of the 3gLM-R - A new supraglottic airway device.

Pavel Michalek1, Barbora Jindrova2, Petr Kriz2, Martin Stritesky2, Martin Sedlar3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Supraglottic airway devices are designed for airway management during anaesthesia. The 3gLM is a novel device with a non-inflatable soft cuff and separate channels for gas delivery and drainage of gastric content.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational study of the 3gLM, version R, size 4 in 40 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery, evaluated the insertion success rate at the 1st attempt as the primary outcome. Secondary aims included insertion parameters, such as total success rate, insertion time, oropharyngeal seal pressures, postoperative complications and a comparison between males and females.
RESULTS: First attempt insertion success rate was 80% (70% in males, 90% in female patients, p=0.24), while total insertion success rate was 92.5% (85% in males, 100% in females, p=0.23). The oropharyngeal seal pressures were 27cmH2O, higher in females (29.4cmH2O) than in males (24.2cmH2O) - p=0.002. Postoperative complications were only temporary and included sore throat (24.3%), hoarseness (10.8%), pain on swallowing (10.8%) and minor tongue haematoma (2.5%). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the genders apart from hoarseness. No aspiration of gastric contents or other long-term complications occurred in this cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3gLM exhibited oropharyngeal seal pressures adequate for the controlled ventilation in most patients. Size 4 of the device showed higher pressures in females than in men.
Copyright © 2015 Medical University of Bialystok. Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3gLM; Controlled ventilation; Oropharyngeal seal pressure; Supraglottic airway device

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25827129     DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2015.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Med Sci        ISSN: 1896-1126            Impact factor:   3.287


  4 in total

Review 1.  Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine.

Authors:  Pavel Michalek; William Donaldson; Eliska Vobrubova; Marek Hakl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Exchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices.

Authors:  Lukasz Szarpak; Zenon Truszewski; Joseph Vitale; Logan Glosser; Kurt Ruetzler; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Supraglottic airway devices: More devices and research required?

Authors:  Sheila N Myatra; Jeson R Doctor
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Comparison of five 2nd-generation supraglottic airway devices for airway management performed by novice military operators.

Authors:  Tomas Henlin; Michal Sotak; Petr Kovaricek; Tomas Tyll; Lukas Balcarek; Pavel Michalek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.