Literature DB >> 25826472

Correction: the circadian regulation of sleep: impact of a functional ADA-polymorphism and its association to working memory improvements.

.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113734.].

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25826472      PMCID: PMC4380494          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


There is an error in Fig. 4, “Accuracy patterns over time according to sleep pressure condition and genotype, separately for 3-back (upper panels) and 0-back (lower panels).” Please see the complete, correct Fig. 4 and its legend here.
Fig. 4

Accuracy patterns over time according to sleep pressure condition and genotype, separately for 3-back (upper panels) and 0-back (lower panels).

Accuracy was calculated by a difference ratio (hit targets—false alarms). Grey rectangles indicate scheduled nap sleep episodes. In the 3-back task, accuracy improved from the first to the last test in the nap condition (NP, [A], F[9,183] = 11.66, p<0.0001; post hoc p<0.0001), while the first and the last test did not significantly differ during sleep deprivation (SD, [B], F[9,184] = 8.84, p<0.0001, post hoc p>0.1). When working memory load was set to a minimum in the 0-back task (lower panels), accuracy remained stable from the first to the last test in the nap condition ([C], F[9,183] = 3.65, p = 0.0003; post hoc p>0.1), but decreased significantly during sleep deprivation ([D], F[9,184] = 8.62, p<0.0001; post hoc p = 0.01). G/A-allele carriers performed constantly at a higher level in the 0-back version compared to G/G-allele carriers ([C], F[1,21] = 8.17, p = 0.009), indicating differences in basic attentional resources between genotypes during the nap condition.

Accuracy patterns over time according to sleep pressure condition and genotype, separately for 3-back (upper panels) and 0-back (lower panels).

Accuracy was calculated by a difference ratio (hit targets—false alarms). Grey rectangles indicate scheduled nap sleep episodes. In the 3-back task, accuracy improved from the first to the last test in the nap condition (NP, [A], F[9,183] = 11.66, p<0.0001; post hoc p<0.0001), while the first and the last test did not significantly differ during sleep deprivation (SD, [B], F[9,184] = 8.84, p<0.0001, post hoc p>0.1). When working memory load was set to a minimum in the 0-back task (lower panels), accuracy remained stable from the first to the last test in the nap condition ([C], F[9,183] = 3.65, p = 0.0003; post hoc p>0.1), but decreased significantly during sleep deprivation ([D], F[9,184] = 8.62, p<0.0001; post hoc p = 0.01). G/A-allele carriers performed constantly at a higher level in the 0-back version compared to G/G-allele carriers ([C], F[1,21] = 8.17, p = 0.009), indicating differences in basic attentional resources between genotypes during the nap condition.
  1 in total

1.  The circadian regulation of sleep: impact of a functional ADA-polymorphism and its association to working memory improvements.

Authors:  Carolin F Reichert; Micheline Maire; Virginie Gabel; Marcel Hofstetter; Antoine U Viola; Vitaliy Kolodyazhniy; Werner Strobel; Thomas Goetz; Valérie Bachmann; Hans-Peter Landolt; Christian Cajochen; Christina Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.